DPA Killer The Storm is Coming.  


The Storm is Coming


The Knockout PunchHud is trying to deliver another knockout punch to the housing industry.  Round 2 at eliminating Down Payment Assistance.  The proposed rule has just been published and has a 60 day comment period ending on August 15, 2008.

HUD's topline motive is that loans carrying down-payment assistance have a higher default rate.  I don't think there is any way to logically argue against that fact; a borrower with no money involved is likely to walk away.  HUD manages this higher default rate the same way they manage all defaults.  A default is considered any loan that is 60 days or more delinquent, and still considered a default for a two-year period, even if the customer becomes current during that time.  If a mortgagee exceeds a 200% default rate of other mortgages in the same field office area, then their origination approval rate can be terminated.  An example would be a FHA lender (Lender A) that has originated 300 FHA loans in 2 years, and had 30 loans default (60 days or more delinquent) would hae a 10% default rate.  Now if the other FHA lenders in the area average 300 FHA loans in the 2 years period as well but only have 15 loans in default, a 5% default rate.  Then Lender A would use their ability to do FHA loans.  This is significant because it doesn't matter if they are the only lender doing purchases in the market, or if all their loans carry down payment assistance or not, or all their loans came from an employor that is now defunct.  So, while Down payment assistance loans may default more often, HUD by their own policy is elminating the Lenders that close these loans.

HUD's secondary motive is that the seller benefits.  That is a shock as well isn't it?  The seller got their house sold.  But didn't the borrower get into a house, that they could afford, but didn't have the means to put 3% into the downpayment.  The seller while they got their house sold did just contribute 3.75% to a charitable organization.  While every party benefits, I do not feel that down payment assistance allows the seller to sale their house at more favorable terms.  What we have seen in our market is that sales typically happen at 97% of list price, but with down payment assitance it is closer to 98-99%.  Not a real measurable benefit to the seller there.

Most FHA programs require that a borrower put a 3% investment in the property. The 2nd round publushed regulation would prohibit the borrower from receiving seller-funded downpayment assistance to meet the 3% requirement.  The regulation would not aloow downpayment assistance that comes from the following parties, "before, during, or after closing of the property sale:  (1) the seller, or any other person or entity that financially benefits from the transactions; or (2) any third party or entity that is reimbursed directly or indirectly by the seller, or any other person or entity that financially benefits from the transaction."  The only difference in this re-published regulation and the original published last year, is that HUD is now offering evidence to address concerns raised in the District Courts.  Specifically HUD's rationale for the regulations, see Topline Motive and Secondary Motive above.    T

This 2nd round regulation does not eliminate all privately-funded downpayment assistance, just like the original.  A borrower may receive downpayment assistance from:  family, employer, state, local, or tribal government, or charitable organizations that do not have a financial interest in the sell of the property. 


I think HUD needs to offer an alternative, a little higher upfront mortgage insurance premium.  Higher monthy mortgage insurance premium and 100% financing.


I'll show you how to have your voice heard in 4 easy steps.

Step 1:

Go to:  http://www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp
Type in USMS 102, then click Go.

Comment on HUD DPA - Part I

Step 2:  
You may need to go to the 2nd page or back further.  You are looking for:  FR-5087-N-04: Standards for Mortgagors Investment in Mortgaged Property: Additional Public Comment Period

Once you find that, click on the Send a Comment or Submission.

Comment on HUD DPA - Part II

Step 3:

You will need to fill out a little information about yourself..  Here is where you type up your comment.  I also recommend having your comment in a Word document format to upload as well.  Enter your comments, and upload your word document, then click next Step.

Some key points to consider when writing out your comments:
  1. Significant impanct on minority homebuyers, low-income homebuyers, and first time homebuyers.  The very people HUD is charged with increasing homeownership for.
  2. Significant impact on the already impaired mortgage industry.  There are 2 primary products availble presently:  Convention and FHA.  This would elminate a large portion of those FHA purchases.
  3. Alternatives:  100% Financing, higher upfront mortgage insurance, and higher monthly mortgage insurance to offset the increased risk.
  4. Alternatives:  Set allowable levels of loans carrying down payment assistance by FHA lender.

Comment on HUD DPA - Part III


Step 4:  
Finally to the easy Step, click Submit.
Comment on HUD DPA - Final Step

Just like I said, as easy as 1, 2, 3, 4.  Make your voice heard.
Subscribe to my Blog
 

6 Comments on Comment Now Before FHA Takes Another Bullet Out of Your Gun

JUN
17
2008
283,872 Points 13 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Jeremiah!

Great info, flagging you for a star!  What great information you have provided to us.

I would really like permission to print this out as I would like to reference this article for my customers.

Please let me know if that is ok with you.

Karen

9:05pm • #1
1 Featured Post

Karen,

Thanks for the kind remarks.  You have my permission to distribute out.  The more people we can get to comment the better. This is a shock to the system that we really don't need right now.

9:12pm • #2

I guess HUD is doing whatever it has to do to minimize high default rate among its borrowers. A borrower with no vested equity in a property is more likely to get up and walk away from the property at the first sign of financial trouble.

 

9:22pm • #4
479,748 Points 41 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Thanks for the update.  With rising interest rates and fewer financing options for first time buyers our market could be in for more tough times.

9:24pm • #5
JUN
21
2008
1 Featured Post

Great post Jeremiah! Of course a buyer with less investment in the property would seem to be more likely to walk away, but how significant is the difference between someone who put nothing down and maybe used their 3% for moving and decorating expenses (instead of new credit card debt) and someone who put a measly 3% down and had nothing left in their bank account?

I can understand how someone who puts 10 or 20% down might be reluctant to walk away even when values plummet and major businesses in the area start going bankrupt (Been to Detroit lately? Think DPA is what is causing defaults there?), but no one can convince me that 3% down is going to prevent someone who lost their job from defaulting.

HUD needs to remember why FHA even exists in the first place. Loans that are targeted at expanding opportunities to borrowers that traditional lenders wouldn't loan money to are always going to have higher defaults. I know this doesn't directly affect the FHA insurance fund, but if they want to make a fair comparison, HUD should be comparing default rates on FHA loans to borrowers using down payment assistance to borrowers who got subprime 100% LTV loans and considering the complete economic impact of each group in terms of building wealth for more people and greater property taxes to governments.

There is a lot that could be done short of getting rid of DPA without implementing higher LTVs on FHA loans - reserve requirements and stricter debt ratios among them. There is no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water.

Everybody please take Jeremiah's advice and use his instructions above to make sure FHA gets plenty of comments.

Thanks!

Carl Pruitt

12:25pm • #6

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Img_0023 Rainmaker_large

Jeremiah Wean

Indianapolis, IN

More about me…

Lakewood Lending Group, LLC

Address: 5023 East 56th Street, Suite 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46226

Office Phone: (317) 348-4268

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find IN real estate agents and Indianapolis real estate on ActiveRain.