Special offer

Making BRAC families feel welcome and comfortable in Harford County.

By
Real Estate Agent with Exit Preferred Realty 623087

With the BRAC movement in the Harford County, Maryland area, Realtors are seeing a large number of families from N.J. being transferred to the base here called Aberdeen Proving Grounds. Many of these people will be moving in the next year or two. However, to get used to the idea and to see what the location change will bring, they are asking Realtors such as myself to show them homes.

Some agents may feel this is a big waste of time since some of these purchases won't be for a year. But, I try to see it from the families' points of view. Moving is stressful enough, but to move to a new state causes more apprehension. Thoughts like -  what community will I fit best, how are the schools, how much house can I afford?

Why not take some of the stress out of the upcoming move? Stay in contact and create a long term relationship. These families are bound to come back to me once I establish that I am here to help make their transition as smooth as possible.

Posted by

Bel Air Md Homes for Sale -Linda Greco, Harford County Residential Real Estate Expert at Exit Preferred Realty Bel Air MD provides all of your real estate needs in Bel Air MD, Fallston, MD, and surrounding areas of residential Harford County. Linda Greco offers her life time Bel Air MD, Fallston MD, and surrounding Harford County life time expertise to provide an excellent level of service to those Buying and Selling Homes in Bel Air MD and Surrounding Areas. Call  410.877.4804

Dana Couch-Davis
Kendall Haney Realty Group - Memphis, TN
CRS, GRI, ABR, SRES

Linda I call it an investment of time and trust me it has big returns.  A federal agency here in DC started moving a large number of personnel into the area and I took on several of those families two years ago.  They were all rentals, but those rentals turned into some sales.

Jun 24, 2008 08:53 AM
Kimberly Grant
Exit Leon Crawford Realty - Huntsville, AL
Real Estate Agent - Huntsville Alabama

Linda I completely agree with you.  I have a similar situation in my area regarding the BRAC.  I had a family contact me over a year ago and they anticipated moving in 2009 and then they called a few months ago to say that the timeline was moved up.  They admitted to me after closing that they contacted multiple Realtors and I was the only one that stayed in touch aftere they revealed their timeline.

Jun 24, 2008 09:10 AM
Robert Rauf
CMG Home Loans - Toms River, NJ

So you get to meet the Fort Monmouth people!

that is pretty close to my area. I have friends that work there, and one of them is working on the transfer. My sons Boy Scout troop actually stayed in MD at the base where they are all being transfed to.  The talk around here is what will happen to FT Monmouth.. It is a great piece of Real Estate available to be developed now.

Jun 25, 2008 02:00 AM
Anonymous
Frank Keegan
GO TO baltimoreexaminer.com for to read the complete GAO report and for links to BRAC Web sites. http://www.examiner.com/a-1459560~BRAC_under_sight_threatens_mission.html Editorial BRAC under-sight threatens mission The Baltimore Examiner Newspaper 2008-06-26 BALTIMORE - If for the past three years a BRAC oversight committee was supposed to be helping communities deal with local impacts of the biggest military move in U.S. history, why are we victims of gross under-sight? According to a Government Accountability Office report on the 15-year-old Base Realignment and Closure process, a committee mandated by President Bush to ensure communities are not crushed by Department of Defense moves has not met since November 2006. The report says local “planning efforts have been hampered by a lack of consistent and detailed information about anticipated DOD personnel movements. ... Communities lack the detailed planning information, such as the growth population demographics, necessary to effectively plan and obtain financing for infrastructure projects.” This failure of the secretary of defense to provide “the high-level leadership” under its own directive leaves communities identified as “substantially and seriously impacted” in a bureaucratic limbo that will clog roads, crowd schools, overwhelm utilities, burden housing, increase taxes and negate many of the expected benefits BRAC jobs will bring. Worse, the inability of local and state governments nationwide to prepare for the influx of more than 173,000 personnel — and even more family members and contractors — in 20 communities by 2012 could impede the missions of those bases. Three of those “high-impact” communities are in Maryland, and already we know that in transportation alone people are going to have trouble getting to work on time no matter what we do now or how much we spend. DOD projects growth by 28,000 families in Maryland from expanding Aberdeen Proving Ground, Fort Meade and Bethesda National Naval Medical Center. APG, Fort Meade and Bethesda missions are immediately critical to national security. If their personnel can’t get to work, find housing and educate their children, if they must endure water shortages and brownouts, they’ll go work someplace else for somebody else. We need employees with knowledge and skills in demand all over the nation and around the world. Patriotism only goes so far if they must live in communities suffering “infrastructure challenges,” as the GAO euphemism puts it. Based on the GAO report, our local, state and federal servants reflexively demanded more money. OK. Money is necessary. But it will be wasted without “a clearinghouse for information sharing which could more effectively match government resources with the needs of DOD-impacted communities.” That costs nothing. GAO says, “DOD agreed with our recommendations.” Good. Now turn under-sight into oversight.
Jun 26, 2008 12:16 AM
#4
Robert Rauf
CMG Home Loans - Toms River, NJ

good Morning Linda, There was an article on the front page of our local paper RE: Fort Monmouth and the move to MD, http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2008806300356

if the link does not work go to www.app.com and search "buying time for MD."  it was the first article on the front page of today's Asbury Park Press.  I thought you may be interested... it also opens the door up for you to blog there!

I hope all is well in MD!

Rob

Jun 30, 2008 02:07 AM
Anonymous
Frank Keegan

Maryland Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown comments on BRAC in The Baltimore Examiner, www.baltimoreexaminer.com

http://www.examiner.com/a-1466935~Anthony_G__Brown__Md__moves_forward_on_BRAC_plans.html

 

Jul 01, 2008 12:26 AM
#6
Anonymous
Frank Keegan

Maryland Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown comments on BRAC in The Baltimore Examiner, www.baltimoreexaminer.com

http://www.examiner.com/a-1466935~Anthony_G__Brown__Md__moves_forward_on_BRAC_plans.html

 

Jul 01, 2008 12:26 AM
#7
Anonymous
Frank Keegan

Maryland Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown comments on BRAC in The Baltimore Examiner, www.baltimoreexaminer.com

http://www.examiner.com/a-1466935~Anthony_G__Brown__Md__moves_forward_on_BRAC_plans.html

 

Jul 01, 2008 12:26 AM
#8
Anonymous
Frank Keegan

http://www.baltimoreexaminer.com/opinion/Learn_for_defense_to_make_BRAC_work_in_Maryland.html

Learn for defense to make BRAC work in Maryland
By Baltimore Examiner Newspapers 8/19/08
Thank our Government Accountability Office for a warning shot of reality last week. GAO projects worker shortfalls when 5,100 jobs move to Aberdeen Proving Ground in three years. Maryland must prove, right now, that won’t happen.
APG could be short 2,200 employees when the Fort Monmouth, N.J., jobs move here because surveys there indicate about half the employees say they will retire instead of moving. More than half of current employees will be eligible by then.
The Department of Defense noticed that eight years ago and began trying to prepare. It means Monmouth’s essential, technologically intense national security mission has a big problem no matter where it is.
Opponents of closing Monmouth seize upon this GAO report and distort it -- as they have others.
But everybody must face BRAC facts. Congress and the president created it to eliminate just such parochial, political and special interest meddling in allocation of our precious resources.
Consolidating at APG makes sense for a myriad reasons far outweighing the few against. This latest GAO report is a perfect example.
DOD knew a personnel problem loomed five years before any decision to consolidate at APG. Half these essential employees would be eligible for retirement BRAC or no BRAC. Relocation, at most, is but one small factor.
Our strategic question -- not just in this revealing case but throughout our defense establishment -- is whether we can anywhere in America produce personnel with the brains, fundamental knowledge and learning ability requisite to defense.
Core mission is the same as 50,000 years ago: Bringing effective force to bear over distance. But how we do that now requires more brain than brawn. Surely, the men and women who still must have the strength, courage and will to go kill human beings ultimately remain the cutting edge of our sword. But more and more of the blade backing them is forged from knowledge and intellect.
That modern alloy is weak and growing weaker. One key indicator: According to a report last year, as of 2005 China produced 9,427 engineering Ph.D.s. We graduated 7,333, but 60 percent of those were foreign nationals.
Maryland officials claim our education system can fill any Monmouth transfer shortfall. And they opened an office there to counter disinformation about quality of life in our state so more personnel will move.
But they must act decisively now to ensure from kindergarten through graduate schools we educate the citizens needed to defend us in this vortex of rapidly evolving modern warfare. Then send a message to headquarters in Washington demanding our entire nation fill the breach.
This latest GAO report reveals a bigger problem than a few thousand Fort Monmouth employees refusing to transfer. It is a warning shot through the weakest spot in our 21st Century defense shield.

Aug 19, 2008 03:04 AM
#9