|
Find CA real estate agents and Fresno real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
7 Comments on The Difference Between the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 and State Anti-Deficiency Laws
Lisa,
great artilcle.
could you clarify this
"Debt used to refinance a taxpayer's home will qualify up to the extent that the principal balance of the old mortgage, immediately prior to refinancing would have qualified."
some people have re-fied numverous times.
assume home purchased for 100k
later refinanced for 170k
then refied again for 250k
then again for 325k
home is foreclosed upon and sells for 180k
Will owner have any tax liability or is above covered under MFDRA?
Lazarus:
My understanding is the MFDRA would cover the principal balance just prior to refinancing the first time. Assuming that it was 100% financed, the MFDRA would cover the balance of the $100,000 loan just prior to the first refinance. So, also assume that the balance at that time was very close to $100,000.
At the time of sale, the lender may be forgiving(you need to check the language of the documents because they probably are not waiving their rights to recover the deficiency on the last refi) the $145,000. Under MFDRA, my understanding is that $100,000 would qualify and not be considereed income for federal tax purposes but the $45,000 would be considered income unless they used those re-fis to "substantially improve" the property, then the whole amount would be covered by MFDRA.
Now, regarding anti-deficiency laws. My understanding is that the antideficiency laws in the state of California only apply to "purchase money" loans. Once they refi'ed they lost the protection of the anti-deficiency statute.
Your client needs to talk to their tax advisor to sort out their potential tax liability and whether the lender may come after them for the $145,000 deficiency.
This is a complicated area and my purpose in providing the information was to point out the differences between the federal income tax relief and anti-deficiency laws because as you can they are easily confused.
I would highly recommend not getting into specifics with your clients but point out the need to meet with their tax advisor regarding the tax implications and potentially an attorney regarding the deficiency issues. You don't want them thinking that you are giving them advice on these issues because of the liability exposure you may assume.
Lisa
Lisa, please insert this to our Optimist group also and I will make it a featured post. It is extremely informative and I want to share it with the group and keep it engaged by our comments.
You've done an exceptional job on this! Thank you!
May I have your permission to post it on my company's blog?
Mirela:
I will re-post it to The Optimist Group. You may absolutely post it on your company's blog.
Lisa
Excellent post! I'm glad that you pointed out the differences between the two and the limitations on the IRS plan. Personally, I've always thought that taxing people on a gain that they don't realize after they've lost their home was a bit harsh!
Bob Mitchell
ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc.
Bob:
Prior to the MDFRA the IRS was not taxing people on gain, rather they were being taxed on the debt amount that the lender forgave. Their point of view was that the "debt relief" was equivalent to ordinary income. MDFRA permits the taxpayer to exclude that debt relief from being counted as ordinary income if the loan was a purchase money loan for a principle residence (refis are discussed above).
Remember, that gain is the difference between Net Adjusted Basis (the amount the property was purchase with some adjustments for improvements and depreciation) and the amount the sale price of the property.
Typically, if the property sells for less than it was purchased there will not be any gain (unless the property was purchased in a 1031 exchange which would lower the basis by the amount of gain deferred in the exchange).
Just thought I'd clarify that point. There's a big difference between being taxed on a capital gain and being taxed on debt that was forgiven.
Lisa
Hi Lisa,
Thank you for this great article. I live in Arizona and me and my boyfriend are seriously considering foreclosing on our primary residence. It's not that we cannot afford the payment, but it's because we feel that we don't have the incentive to continue making our payments due to declining home values. We owe $300,000 our house is worth about $200,000. We have $50,000 in the bank & a rental property with no equity, but we simply don't want to continue paying because it defeats the purpose of owning a primary home & hoping in 3-5 years we can sell it for more. Knowing that we have assets, if we foreclosed are we protected by the Anti-deficiency law and the Forgiveness Debt Relief Act?
I would appreciate any answers or suggestions. I've lost 20lbs and have not been sleeping and eating for the last months thinking about this. Any info will help. Thank you
Sincerely,
Jane Lee
codepinay@yahoo.com