Ar_home_b_search
 

Recently I took a listing in one of the lovely Gated communities of San Elijo Hills, a community called Westridge.  This San Elijo Hills won the master planned community of the year award in 2001 and sits about 6 miles inland from some of the best Southern California Beaches.  The homes are well built, the schools and parks are just down the street, and it has been a very popular development to purchase a home in.  Dispite this, shortly my clients listed their Westridge townhome, there were 24 other town homes out of 117 on the market!

Well, this community is going through what I call the TWO Year itch! 

What is the two year itch you might ask?  In 1997 our government passed an extensive tax reform act that impacted how people sell homes.  If a married couple lives in a home as their primary residence for two out of the last five years then they can sell that home and receive up to $500,000 in appreciation as a TAX FREE gain (single people can receive up to $250,000).  So, how is this empacting newer communities through-out San Elijo Hills, San Diego County, and around the Country?   “The Two Year Itch” basically gives sellers added incentive to place their homes on the market even when they really have no Real Intention of selling their home.  This is happening in almost ever newer community, you may have seen the sprouting of real estate yard sign sighns at the 23rd or 24th month of a new communities existance.  This is a mass exodus of people who are trying to take advantage of their two years of appreciation. 

What impression does this give potential buyers?

Two main questions come across the lips of many buyers who drive into a two to 5 year old community:  Why are there so many yard signs, and what is going on here?  Imagine driving up to a lovely gated community and seeing 23 listing signs outside the gate!  Many buyers just turn and run.  What was created as a great stimulation to our economy has turned into a nightmare to those few sellers who really need to sell their homes, the 10 to 15% who may have gotten in over their heads when they purchased their home. 

So Sellers, here is a little Econ 101, the basic laws of supply and demand state that if there is too much supply then prices go down.  If you really don’t have any intention of selling (i.e. if you are telling yourself that if you can get your over inflated price you would CONSIDER selling) take your home off the market!!! Because all you are doing is driving down prices.  How do you know if your home is priced too high?  This is very easy.  Your listing agent should keep you updated of what has SOLD Recently (note that I didn't say what was listed) in your neighborhood.  The most recent and closest Sales to your home are those that matter the most.

While this tax change has made many people hundreds of thousands of dollars, particularly those homeowners who bought their home in San Diego County prior to 2004, it has also forced some homeowners to take a loss because of an over supply in inventory was on the market when the HAD to sell.  This over supply has brought down prices in communities with a glut of listing on the market, even in markets where the prices have trended up they could have gone up even more if there was less inventory! 

The Two Year Itch effects communities that are between 2 and 5 years old and what strikes us agents is we see an influx of sellers who have no real intention in selling their home.  Because these "Sellers" have no real intention of selling their home this pushes up the market times in these newer communities.  Furthermore, the increased number of listings reduces the barganing power that those sellers who really Need to sell have.   In some newer communities I have seen up to 50% of the active listings being listed at what I would consider overpriced.  Within 3 to 6 months in those communities the majority of these overpriced listings eventually Expire or are Canceled but not after doing damage to the market. 

 

3 Comments on The two year itch

NOV
30
2007
You're assuming,sir,that people are taking advantage of the tax law.But if that was the case,why would they wait until now,2007.FIVE YEARS after the community was built?
Bubble Head
7:31pm • #1
DEC
01
2007

Bubble head and Sandy,

Mislead people???

First, the above article was written on 7/11/2006.  It specifically addresses the fact that there was an over supply of inventory of homes on the market in San Elijo Hills then.  I further addresses one of the main reasons that there was so many homes on the market at that time.  The tax law changes that allow Owners to make non taxable gains on a property that they have owned for at least TWO years AND that they have lived in for at least TWO out of the last Five years as a principal residence. 

A large percentage of the Resale Homes that were listed in the San Elijo Hills area of San Marcos in July of 2006 were in an Equity Position based on the price they were purchased for and the Fair Market value at that time.  The median sale price in July of 2006 was over $633,000.  Are you both so delusional to think that this area didn't experience a huge run up in prices from 2001 to 2006? 

While I can't possible get into the heads of every seller who put there home on the market back then; I can analyze the data that is readily available to anyone who wants to do the research.  Further, I do know this market, I live in San Marcos and have been a licensed Real Estate agent in this area for 5 years.  In addition, I have also talked to thousands of buyers and sellers over the last 5 years.  Over 50% of those sellers are aware of this tax law change and many fancied themselves as "Real Estate Investors" from 2001 to 2006.  Boy has that changed.

Here are the facts:

From 4-1-2006 to 7-11/2006 there were 158 homes on the market in San Elijo Hills.  Of those 158 Single family detached homes and Condos 47 sold in that time frame. They sold in an average of 81 days and for a median sale price of $633,732 (a price per square foot of $286). The  Average list price was $662,537.  Of those homes 53% of them qualified for the tax free gain because they had owned there home at least two out of the last five years and it was their primary residence.  Many made over $100,000 on the sale and 10 made over $200,000 of Tax Free Income!

71 homes that were listed  in that time frame Expired.  Which means that the listing contract expired during that time frame before they sold.  The average number of days on market was 115 days and the median list price was $682,513 or $298 per Sq/ft. (Can you say over priced).  Note: 27 of those home were placed back on the market and sold for a Tax Free Gain.

Then an additional 40 home Sellers Canceled their listing contract during this time frame.  These homes were for sale for an average of 100 days and had a median list price of ... $743,963.   The median sale price  in this area was $633,732 and these sellers thought they could get $110,231 more then the guy who just sold his home up the street, how serious were they?  Of those 40 homes,  11 we remarketed and sold at some time between 7/06 and today for a non-taxable gain.

So, close to 40% of the total active listings from 4/1/06 to 7/11/06 had a non-taxable gain.  During that same time period there were a total of 20 short sales and 4 foreclosures out of those 158 origional homes.  So there was a total of just over 15% of the home owners in a distressed sale situation.

Bob Crain
9:31pm • #2

Note to Sandy,

Check the facts before you accuse someone of trying to mislead people.

While real estate prices have recently receded from the highs of 2005, anyone who bought a home in San Diego County prior to 2003 should have at least $100,000 in equity.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/sdhomes/area_homesales/pastyears.php Check the numbers published in the Union Tribune if you don't believe me.

Next, you mentioned the huge amount of sub-prime loans that were made in this area.  According to a recent report by the New York Times, San Diego County only about 23% of the outstanding loans are to sub-prime borrowers. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2007/11/03/weekinreview/20071103_SUBPRIME_GRAPHIC.html?hp#

Then lastly, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association in 2006 about 34% of the home owners nation wide had no mortgage at all.  http://tinyurl.com/3xjbdq

The biggest influence on any market is that of Supply and demand.  If the demand is down then it sure doesn't help to put more inventory out there.  Especially if there is really no real intention of actually Selling that inventory.  For the three months prior to when I wrote that article back in July 2006 there were 88 homes out of 158 (56% of the listings) that were either just testing the market, were ridiculously over priced, or had no real intention of selling.  This caused an over supply of inventory in San Elijo Hills and a reduction in the demand.  Other factors like the Sub-Prime loan business meltdown had not happened yet. 

So, the basic law of supply and demand suggests that with 55% less listings out there this market would still be going up.

This is my challenge to all the home owners out there...

If you really want to sell your home List it at the right price from the day the for sale sign goes up.  If you are just wanting to find out how much your home is worth hire an appraiser.

10:28pm • #3

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Bob_s_pic3

Bob Crain - San Diego County Real Estate Broker

San Marcos, CA

More about me…

Crain Realty - North County Luxury Homes

Office Phone: (760) 744-5755

Cell Phone: (760) 703-5090

Email Me

Get updated information about the San Diego Real Estate market here.



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog