The Democratically controlled Michigan House of Representatives recently passed a bill by a 77-31 margin to suspend the so called "pop-up tax" on the sale of a home for eighteen months, with the suspension to be retroactive to March 1st of this year.

Under Michigan's Proposal A, the taxable value of a home can rise annually by no more than 5 percent, or the inflation rate, whichever is lower.  However, when a house is sold, the taxable value becomes uncapped, and increases (or pops-up) to the assessed value. 

This legislation is designed to spur home sales in the state.  And it may do just that.  There are numerous lakefront properties in Northern Michigan with assessed values that are much higher than taxable values.  The lifting of the pop-up tax would be a major incentive to someone considering such a purchase.

To me, this proposal seems too good to be true.  In light of the current budget crisis, who will pick up the tab for this proposal?  It could certainly have serious budgetary implications.  The homebuilders are apparently opposed to this proposal on the basis that it would put them at a competitive disadvantage to anyone considering a new vs. an existing home.

It is interesting to ponder what other unintended consequences this proposal may have.  However, I for one feel that it is refreshing to be considering a tax incentive proposal, rather than a tax increase proposal, for once.  Creative thinking is what will get us out of the economic malaise we are currently experiencing.   

Here is a link to the Detroit News Article.

 

 
This post has been included in Michigan Information

3 Comments on Michigan House Passes Bill to Temporarily Suspend "Pop-Up Tax"

MAR
17
2007
224,760 Points 2 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog
There are quite a few areas in the country where this is being contemplated.  To tell you the truth, maybe it will foece municipalities to be more proactive in reigning in unnecessary spending.  Time will tell.
4:02pm • #1
MAR
18
2007

Stefan,

Cross your fingers that this does in fact approach some discussion in the Senate.  Passing or not passing will be up in the air until the end, but I want to see at least some good discussion in the Senate about it.  

I agree that the cost to local municipalities will be high if it does pass--with no true way to find additional sources of funding.  

7:21pm • #2
1 Featured Post

Suspending this source of tax revenue will give legislators and their constituents the opportunity to create a more acceptable source or method of generating the tax revenue.   

9:58pm • #3

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Stefan Scholl - Northern Michigan Real Estate

Petoskey, MI

More about me…

Buyer's Broker of Northern Michigan, LLC

Address: 3280 Woods Way, Suite 4, Petoskey, MI, 49770

Office Phone: (231) 347-9600

Cell Phone: (231) 881-2550

Email Me

Northern Michigan Real Estate news, commentary and market information published by Stefan Scholl, real estate attorney, exclusive buyer agent and broker/owner of Buyer's Broker of Northern Michigan, LLC.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find MI real estate agents and Petoskey real estate on ActiveRain.