Special offer

Government Bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with HomeFinder.com

With their hands on about 50 percent of all mortgages in the United States at an estimated $5 trillion, lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have a huge impact on swinging the housing pendulum. The Federal National Mortgage Association, nicknamed Fannie Mae, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac, were created by Congress decades ago to provide a steady stream of money for home mortgages.

Impact on first-time homebuyers
If you already have a mortgage and don't need a new one and don't own shares in Fannie or Freddie, then recent news of a government bailout of the two lenders may not keep you up a night. But if you're thinking on getting a mortgage anytime soon, then you need to start paying close attention to what the future holds for these two financial giants. Fannie and Freddie borrow money in the bond markets to buy mortgages from lenders. They're unusual entities, private companies traded on the stock market, but also operating as government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs, with a widespread sense that they have the guarantee of the government behind them.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced the plans to bailout Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on Sunday. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced the plans to bailout Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on Sunday.

Because of the implicit guarantee that they're backed by the U.S. government, Fannie and Freddie can borrow at very low interest rates. But the housing collapse and a skyrocketing foreclosure rate have undermined the financial markets' confidence in the two companies that underwrite half the nation's mortgages. The result will be higher mortgage interest rates, according to members of the Federal Housing Finance Board.

If prices are going to stabilize, the market needs to produce more first-time home buyers than new houses. It is through increased affordability in homes that will bring this breed of buyers back to the market. When entry-level buyers flood the market, they not only stimulate production of new homes, they purchase existing homes. Those purchases, in turn, allow the sellers to move up to bigger houses. Without first-time home buyers, the food chain is frozen, and the glut of homes continues to pile up. But if mortgage rates increase, the likelihood of these first-time buyers will continue to shrink.

Necessary evil
In an National Public Radio (NPR) broadcast last Friday, Douglas Elmendorf of the Brookings Institution, argued that a government bailout "will give Fannie and Freddie a steady source of cheap money, the lower cost of borrowing would be passed on to future home buyers. That could prove necessary now that the growing number of mortgage defaults have made private lenders extremely skittish."

On Monday, days after insisting that a bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wasn't necessary, the Bush administration announced an unprecedented plan to support the mortgage giants, reported NPR Monday morning. Regulators unveiled steps Sunday night aimed at reassuring investors that the companies are still healthy.

Bailout plan
Under the plan, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced, "The companies would be allowed to borrow from the Federal Reserve's discount lending window if they need to. The Treasury Department said it would also ask Congress for permission to buy shares of the companies' stock (this would involve using tax payer dollars). It also increased the line of credit available to them. The message to investors was that the companies have all the money they need and aren't going to collapse anytime soon, so they shouldn't be afraid to buy their securities," reported NPR.

As of March 31, the two companies combined had over $500 billion of short-term debt outstanding. If the companies can't persuade investors to give them money, they have no way of paying off that debt.

While the Bush administration had fervently argued that the government would not tap taxpayer coffers to bailout lenders, they are doing just that with this new plan. But due to the shear magnitude of a possible Fannie and Freddie collapse, government officials say their main goal right now is to prevent the housing market from sinking deeper into the abyss.

Do you think the government should bailout Fannie and Freddie? Or do think the market should be left alone to correct itself?

Got hot local housing tips or a story you want to share? Contact Amy Le at openingdoorsblog@homescape.com

Posted by

Questions? Contact us.

 

(888) 536-9889 or communications@homefinder.com 

 

Connect with us!

www.facebook.com/homefinderdotcom

www.twitter.com/homefinder1 

 

 

Comments (5)

Dave Woodson
Dave Woodson - Chesterton, IN
Not the Average Agent

I don't think a bailout will be needed, but if so, then yes.  They represent too much in the ways of mortgages

 

Dave Woodson

Jul 15, 2008 03:46 AM
Michele Reneau
Certified Staging Professional (CSP) Elite Instructor - Summerville, SC
Realtor, GRI ~ Charleston, SC Relocation Experts Team

I think a bailout is a bad idea.  This is a necessary recorrection of poor banking guidelines and restrictions. If the government taxpayers keep bailing out banks, it doesn't teach them anything.  It's like bailing your child out of jail all the time.  The child learns that if he can keep up his antics because mom will bail him out. Enough! Besides, I don't want my tax dollars being used this way.   

What about all the folks that pay their mortgage on time, or bought wisely within their budget, or used a reputable lender and realtor to help them make good decisions. Ultimately, the final decision lies with the borrower, and it's time for borrowers to be educated about the process and weigh the pros and cons or ARMS, Buy down mortgages, and other creative financing.  I know this is a tough market, but it's time to get back to the basics.  Start saving money for downpayments and lend money to folks who have proven to pay on time, etc.  This is a recorrection needed. Foreclosures hurt values right now and I don't like them either, but I think it will help with affordability in home prices.  It's a painful process, but in 2 years when this is all behind us, folks will look back and say, wish I would have bought a house then when prices were so low.

Jul 15, 2008 03:55 AM
Mike Frazier
Carousel Realty of Dyer County - Dyersburg, TN
Northwest Tennessee Realtor

Amy,

A bailout may be necessary but at least reform in making mortgages is absolutely necessary to fix the problems.

Jul 15, 2008 04:01 AM
Anonymous
Amy Le

Michele,

I totally agree with you that tax payer dollars shouldn't be used to bail out the speculators, flippers and make up for poor underwriting standards by lending companies. But  the only problem with Freddie and Fannie is that they have written more than 50 percent of the mortgages in this country, and if they can't shore up investor confidence, there is no way they will be able to pay off their $500 billion plus short-term-debt. As a result, they will jack up their rates on mortgages. No one likes foreclosures, and no one wants home values to go down, but if interest rates are too high, there will be little takers when it comes to finding those first-time home buyers you need to buy off that cheep overstock housing inventory. It's all inner-connected, and unfortunately Frannie and Freddie should have never been in this position to have written more than half the mortgage loans in this country. After all is said and done, Washington officials need to stop sleeping with these lending giants and let them be the private for-profit entity they have been acting for the last decade.  

 

 

 

Jul 15, 2008 07:26 AM
#4
Larry Bettag
Cherry Creek Mortgage Illinois Residential Mortgage License LMB #0005759 Cherry Creek Mortgage NMLS #: 3001 - Saint Charles, IL
Vice-President of National Production

This is incredible....it really is....I am aware of the government's necessity to get involved with this fiasco.

Jul 15, 2008 03:42 PM