Special offer

I don't think this was Countrywide's first rodeo

By
Mortgage and Lending with January Financial

Sneaky ThiefBreaking news: Countrywide may have been involved in deceptive mortgage lending practices.

I'm not a fan of cynicism, but are we really surprised to hear that a major lender may have had a couple people working for them with less than sterling morals??

CNBC.com reported the story yesterday, saying that California's attorney general is looking into some things that happened at Countrywide before Bank of America took over. They bring up a particularly heinous case of deceit involving an older veteran who defaulted within 6 months after a shoddy loan.

Back in the day, I worked for Wells Fargo, a company featured in the book Good to Great by Jim Collins for its stellar management system, etc. I was actually really proud when I got the job because I had read the book and was really impressed by the company's values.

While working there, I saw multiple instances of disregard for Wells Fargo's strict policies on morals and ethics. I saw bankers with whom I wouldn't trust a penny of my own get people into investments and loans. All this is not to knock Wells Fargo but to point out that it's possible for the best of companies to hire the shadiest of characters.

Obviously, some of these characters were also at Countrywide.

So, the question I pose to you is, how should justice be served? On Countrywide? On Bank of America? On the loan officers? Is there even a way to bring about retribution?

Cyara Pott - Market Specialist

Comments(4)

Fred Chamberlin
Guild Mortgage Co - Oak Harbor WA - Oak Harbor, WA
Oak Harbor/Whidbeynulls, #1 Experienced FHA Mortgage Consultant

I can only say, Duh! No matter the company, when you have size, you also get unethical people. Good post

Jul 18, 2008 05:38 AM
Brian Schulman
Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage, Lancaster PA - Lancaster, PA
Lancaster County PA RealEstate Expert 717-951-5552

Cyara, I think individuals have to be brought to justice when it is shown that they have been deceptive.  If a company had good policies but someone flouted them, it's not fair to put the whole company and all the shareholders out of business - but the responsible individuals should be punished.

The company should be fined only to the extent that they knew - or should have known - about the transgressions.

Jul 18, 2008 05:38 AM
Paul McFadden
Responsive Pest Control - Seattle, WA
Pest Control, Seattle, WA.

Carey: There are always crooks, even at good institutions. Personally I'm in favor of national licensing. This wouldn't clear everything up but would take care of a lot of the scofflaws. Take care.

 

Paul

Jul 18, 2008 06:43 AM
Carey Pott
January Financial - Foothill Ranch, CA

Fred - it seems like the bigger you get, the harder it becomes to weed out the undesirable applicants. I'd like to say that's the reason our company employs around 5 people... :)

Brian - I agree, individuals definitely should take the brunt of the punishment. If the firm is also guilty, then they should get a share too.

Paul - anything to set the entry barriers higher, right? Not a lot of crooks are interested in working hard unless there's a big payoff. In real estate, you have to keep working hard after already working hard to benefit!

Jul 18, 2008 09:09 AM