Help me out here folks because I am really struggling on this one....

I currently have numerous listings in a neighborhood where homes are still being built. We all know how difficult it can be to compete with new construction; especially when the construction company also has an owner's interest in a mortgage company and can offer tantalizing financing incentives. But...what about when you are told Good Luck selling your resales because the builders are offering huge incentives to Buyer's Agents?!

What exactly does that imply? Am I to understand that there are actually agents who will just show their buyers the newer homes because it is a bigger payoff to them??? I've heard the justification - well, the homes are the same   anyway, so they aren't shortchanging the buyer on homes that fit their criteria. But really - I have shown two homes that were identical in floor plan, both with colors throughout the homes that the buyers liked, but the floor plans were simply reversed. In one home, the kitchen was on the left and FR on the right. On the other home, vice versa.  And the buyers made their decision on which home solely on which side of the house the kitchen was on! (Something you would not know without having actually gone in to see the home!)

Now it's one thing if a buyer has specified that they want a new home. I get that. But I have had several agents suggest that my sellers need to offer an incentive to the buyer's agent to get them to even show their home. WHY? Isn't it our JOB to show the homes that meet our buyer's criteria?

I represent both sellers and buyers. And when I send homes to my buyer clients, I send them EVERYTHING that fits what they have told me they are looking for. I don't care if it is the same floor plan five times over. They might like the position of the rooms better in one over another, the position of the sun rising/setting, etc. And the way I see it, if they are all in the same neighborhood anyway, it'll be a quick trip. They quickly realize they are looking at the same floor plan, and if it is one they like, we walk through all of them so they can decide which one they like better as far as personal characteristics. But that is up to my BUYER to decide, not ME! It should be based on their personal preference, NOT MY COMMISSION!!

Am I crazy here? Don't get me wrong, I am not saying a buyer's agent shouldn't accept a commission bonus when one is offered. But I do have to say, if agents start narrowing their buyer's list based on their commission check, the backlash is going to be ugly! Commission bonuses may be banned. And I think it goes without saying what that will do to our already struggling public image as a profession.

Imagine telling your sellers that they may want to consider offering an incentive to buyer's agent just so they will consider showing their home....wow, are we not screaming out - REALTORS are greedy?! money

I would really LOVE to hear I am not the only one baffled by this...Call me idealistic, but I still believe there are those who are looking out for the best interests of their clients...you know, people who are still doing their job.

Dawn Nuzzi, Owner / Broker

Direct: (919) 539-7688
Email: dawn@tildawnrealestate.com
Website: www.tildawnrealestate.com

 
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: RE/MAX Active Rain Bloggers
Post is included in group: Accountability Central
Post is included in group: Dedicated Bloggers
Post is included in group: It's A Buyer's Market

11 Comments on Ethics vs Greed or am I just an Idealistic Realtor?

JUL
29
2008
131,089 Points 10 Featured Posts Outside Blog

I've also wondered about those poor owners who bought new construction and now the builder has slashed the price on the home they just bought by 100K!!  I'm with you - I don't get the "your seller should be offering more incentive to me if I'm going to show the house!"

2:20pm • #1
JUL
30
2008
237,175 Points 5 Featured Posts

It has been my experience that the best incentive for a home to sell is to reduce price, or for seller to offer perks to the buyer. 

Also, I've noted that usually real estate professionals, who choose greed over ethics, don't last long in the business.  Word gets around swiftly in the community, and that doesn't bode well for longevity in the profession.

 

12:35pm • #2
JUL
31
2008

Eleanor - Yep, that's another potential problem. If an owner intends to stay in the house awhile, they will be fine. Once the builders have completed all of their phases, the homes will appreciate again. But for those who have to move now for whatever reason, it's causing a world of hurt.

Myrl - I agree with you!! Lowering a price and offering incentives to a BUYER make sense to me. They are the ones that are making the decision, not the agent.  I also agree and have to keep reminding myself...eventually these agents will put themselves out of business with their greed.

7:59am • #3
584,360 Points 80 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Buyers agents should not ethically accept bonuses.  How are they representing their clients?  Offer a higher commission to compete with the builder.  I've sold many homes in spite of the builders and their incentives over the years.  You must know what you are doing...

8:38am • #4
309,086 Points 8 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router

It shouldn't be true, but I think it is true to many agents. I took a listing with a flat fee and offered the other agent $5000. It was a $250,000 house. Do you know agent after agent called me to complain and tell me they wanted MORE. They were turned off by the "small" co-broke. This was a very special circumstance and I explained it to the agents, and yet over & over they complained. I did sell it, and the agent who sold it didn't comment on the "reduced" commission. She was lovely to work with. I cannot help but think some of those other agents either didn't show the home after all (some skipped it) or perhaps downplayed this home.

8:41am • #5
123,495 Points

Selling a home in the early phases of new construction in a development can be difficult especially if the price of the new home is similar to that of the resale.  It will take time for "resales" in a new development to move on the market.. early on the buyer can get a "new" home for nearly the same price as the "used" home but later on home values for resales will appreciate and move a little better on the market.

8:47am • #6
309,086 Points 8 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router

PS-- I like Jim's idea to up the co-broke to make the playing field even. I did this on a spec home that wasn't selling, and it did sell.

9:27am • #7
110,935 Points 3 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Wow, I am on your side Dawn.  I am guilty of never even looking at what the commission is offered when showing a buyer.  I only want to get them the house they want and deserve.  I would show all of them regardless.

Maybe there is actually more to it.  If it were me, I would probably pick the new house just because it is new and no one has lived in it.  Then again, if no landscaping were done, drapes, lightbulbs (those add up) etc... then I might pick the house that was gently lived in.  Either way, the commission should not come into play. 

You could though make mention to the sellers about what you are up against.  Maybe offer seller concessions, buy down point, etc....something for the buyer, not the agent!

9:51am • #8
AUG
07
2008

Thanks guys for the thoughts/ideas. I have upped the commision for the buyer's agent but it still nowhere comes close to leveling the playing field against the builders. Right now, it's just set up so my company makes less. That's fine by me as this is my neibhorhood and I want to do right by the sellers, and people who are basically my neighbors. But without raising the total commission any higer, which the sellers cannot afford to do, there isn't really any room to offer more to the buyer's agent.

Erica - sad, but true. Flyers are going left and right which makes me think there is obviously some interest in the home. Are they asking their agents about it and getting swayed to the other homes? Gotta wonder....

I'm with you Cristal....I feel if anything is offered, it should go to the actual buyer, not the agent.

2:47pm • #9
AUG
10
2008

I have always wondered about the incentives offered to buyers when they use the builder's lender and I've wondered about the ethics of this.   Builders often use the incentives to keep the base price up, but then offer x dollars off the lot price or upgrades.   There is an inherent problem for builders to slash prices unless the subdivision will be finished soon. If builders reduce the base price, they have reduced the price of all the homes in the subdivision.  They can justify reducing lot prices or giving appliances, or incentives for upgrades.  I still think it's on the margin of ethics though because incentives should be given to everyone, regardless of lender.  (However, sometimes you can get your buyer a better deal not using the builder's lender...it might be 1/4 point higher.)

11:06pm • #10

I just dont get it. I would always look at options for the buyers on funding.

11:16pm • #11

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Dawn Nuzzi

Raleigh, NC

More about me…

'Til Dawn Real Estate

Address: PO Box 401, Rolesville, NC, 27571

Office Phone: (919) 539-7688

Cell Phone: (919) 539-7688

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find NC real estate agents and Raleigh real estate on ActiveRain.