"In April 2008 the National Debt (Unites States total public debt) was $9.5 Trillion" - Wikipedia.

If, in addition, unfunded Medicaid, Social Security, Medicare, etc. promises are added, this figure rises to over $56 Trillion.

To comprehend the magnitude of this debt and the rate at which it continues to grow, it's worth watching the National Debt Clock for a few minutes.

I took the pic (on the right) of the National Debt clock when visiting New York in 2005; the actual number has grown substantially since then

 
Post is included in group: Almost Anything Goes
Post is included in group: LA Connection
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: The Lounge at Active Rain
Post is included in group: Voice of Reason

17 Comments on The National Debt Clock - Is it a Ticking Financial Time-Bomb?

JUL
31
2008
129,765 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

Didn't we actually have a budget surplus when Clinton left office?

10:53pm • #1
AUG
01
2008

Yes, "supposedly" we did by government accounting standards. Not sure what those standards are.

Stewart, Nice photo buddy! Too bad what your photo depicts sucks. Wait, I owe money on that photo! Don't tell China.

3:14am • #2
458,729 Points 27 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Rich - President Bill Clinton left office with a 65% approval rating (despite the charcter assasination effort by the Republicans) and he presided over the longest period of peace-time economic expansion in American history.

He balanced the budget and left office with a federal surplus of $559 billion.

12:29pm • #3
818,377 Points 7 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

It's a disgrace what has happened to this country in the past 2 terms..... so glad it's almost over (or is it?)

5:02pm • #4
469,772 Points 66 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Maybe we can start drilling on our beaches for money too.

7:41pm • #5
AUG
17
2008

Stewart - Our national debt will eventually choke our economy. Kind of like when someone spends on their credit card until it's maxed out then decides that they can only afford the minimum monthly payment.

Looks like it will take another 8 years to eliminate this deficit and unfortunately we will all pay for it. My sense is that it will be painful.

9:45am • #7
AUG
27
2008

Stewart: Why aren't the current candidates talking about this.. The president of the Federal Reseve in Texas gave quite a detailed speech to the Commonwealth Club of CA on this very topic. Obahma and McCain have no interest in telling us the facts - just get into Office and then tell us the bad news. This a more serious threat to our national security than all those terroists G. Bush has been yelling about for the past 5 years. Also, the mainstream news media is clearly irresponsible in their portrayal of our current and future financial status... it might ruin the party.

12:30pm • #8
458,729 Points 27 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Richard - these debt numbers are real, just so large it's difficult to comprehend. I hope that Obama and Biden start to reinforce the severity of what this numbers mean for the country.

10:36pm • #9
AUG
28
2008

Stewart: They won't touch it - SS, Medicare, etc. are the thrid rail in politics - they always wait until it's a crisis to deal with these issues - we need a comprehensive national discussion about how to equitably resolve this serious problem. The same goes for our energy policy - we are subsidizing ethanol and forcing people to pay more for food, etc. It's all about votes.

richard
9:33am • #11
SEP
02
2008
4 Featured Posts Outside Blog

So... Obama is going to make a dent in the national debt?  Is McCain?  I've not heard much at all from either of them.  Do you know something I dont?

8:14pm • #12
SEP
09
2008
Called Shot Master

Federal deficit to soar to $407 billion

Deficit up by $246 billion in a year. Congressional Budget Office cites 'a substantial increase in spending' and 'halt' in tax revenue growth - CNN Money.

That drop in revenue is driven largely by the rebates provided to tax filers from the economic stimulus law Congress passed earlier this year. The spending hike is partly due to efforts by the government "to cover the insured deposits of insolvent financial institutions," the agency said.

11:38am • #13

Stewart: This is just the beginning - we're bailing out Fannie and Freddie to overt disaster in the real estate market, the Big 3 are lobbying everyone for a $50 billion bailout - we have no idea where our economy is headed and we continue to print money to keep us alive - there's no end in sight - the FDIC is going to need more funding to cover pending bank failures, and on, and on, and on. So what's McCain/Palin or Obama/Biden going to propose to get us back on track? I haven't heard anything yet that gives me any confidence that they have a clue. It's very hard to support either party at this point. The media is not using any muscle to get these issues in front of the candidates - they treat this like it's a beauty contest.  

1:53pm • #14
122,166 Points Localism Sponsor

Stewart,

As you know from my past comments to you (by the way I love your political blogs) I am an Independent who has not yet made up my mind. I am doing research, reading everything I can and will wait as I said in an earlier comment, until the "STAR" dust settles and the debates are over. I will vote for who I personally believe is best for America, not only myself!

These are my two question's for you about our economic debt at the cost of sounding stupid to the many Republicans that post blogs and comments on AR. I am only asking for your personal opinion.

#1 "Shouldn't Americans be more concerned with the Presidential Candidate who has the best plan to get us out of this situation rather than being upset they will have to pay higher taxes to accomplish that goal?" 

 And concerning Republicans who dispute this notion, #2 "Why can't Republicans accept they may have to pay higher taxes for putting Bush in Office in the first place?"

Seems to me the people that voted Bush in don't want to pay for their mistake. I will be in that higher tax category. I didn't vote for Bush the second time around but I may have to pay for their mistake and I am not complaining. It is a part of living in this great country AT ANY COST! 

2:52pm • #15

Linda: I am an independent as well and voted for Bush the first time around - I have a number of Republican friends who truly believe that we will not have to pay higher taxes to help put our economy back on its feet. They see Obama as a tax and spend Democrat and McCain as an extension of the Bush monetary policy - they do not want to accept the responsibility, but in the end, if they win they'll have no choice. The only thing that matters to either party is too win and then give us the bad news - Obama has talked about riasing taxes, but his current plan falls way short of the revenue shift we need to turn this around - this will require a long-term solution not some sound bite about over taxing the wealthy - they already pay the lion's share per capita - unfortunately, it's going to be painful for every American - taxing the wealthy at higher rates is not going to make up the difference, but it sounds good.

3:05pm • #16
458,729 Points 27 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Linda - Thanks so much for your kind comments about my political Blogs. As you can tell, I do get passionate about my opinion - but at the same time I am interested to hear other, substantiated views.

I think your two questions are so relevant .... We do need a President who has the intellect and personal skills required to navigate us out of the mess we're in .... and I believed that Hillary Clinton was that person.

Unfortunately, she didn't win the Democratic Candidacy ... so when I researched Obama and McCain I determined (in my opinion) that Obama has a greater capacity to deal with the many different facets of the job. I think McCain is too narrow-minded and limited in his thinking. Taxes are used as a "Hot Button" to evoke emotion rather than clear thought.

Republicans will never admit that Bush was a mistake, so they aren't able to face the cold hard fact that higher taxes (predominantly for the more affluent), is essential to pay our Country's bills.

America is a GREAT country ... and yes it has it's fair share of problems ... but we do have it far better than most in the rest of the world - and for that every individual needs to pay some form of a price - and if it's higher taxes as part of a comprehensive plan for our Nation's future, then so be it! 

3:18pm • #17
OCT
09
2008
458,729 Points 27 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

The National Debt Clock in New York City has run out of digits to record the growing figure.

As a short-term fix, the digital dollar sign on the billboard-style clock near Times Square has been switched to a figure -- the "1" in $10 trillion. It's marking the federal government's current debt at about $10.2 trillion. The late Manhattan real estate developer Seymour Durst put the sign up in 1989 to call attention to what was then a $2.7 trillion debt.

During the 1990's the clock was even switched off when the debt decerased.

The Durst Organization has announced the clock will be replaced in 2009 with a new clock that will be able to track debt up to a quadrillion dollars.

4:32am • #21
JAN
05
2009
458,729 Points 27 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

I recently returned from New York, where I took another pic of the National Debt Clock.

It's incredible to see how our debt has increased since I last photographed the clock about 4 years ago .... when the debt stood at $7.5 Trillion!

8:47pm • #22

Login or register to leave a comment

 
Stewart Penn - DRE# 01339266 (Penn Properties) Rainmaker_large

Stewart Penn - DRE# 01339266

West Hollywood, CA

More about me…

Penn Properties

Address: Los Angeles, CA

Office Phone: (310) 866-1818

Cell Phone: (310) 866-1818

Email Me



Listings

Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog