Special offer

Buyer's Agent in Colorado - Do you really need one?

By
Real Estate Agent with Realty Oasis - Metro Brokers

It isn't unusual for me to get that question when someone is looking at purchasing Denver CO real estate, especially when a buyer is looking at new construction.  But here are the facts.Highlands Ranch home listing

In most all cases, a buyer does not pay the commission of their buyer's agent.  The seller does. So in the case of the first time home buyer, or out of state relocation, it may be tempting to try and go at it alone or use the listing agent, but that is not always the wisest choice.  First of all, if the seller is paying the commission, then why do all the work yourself and still not be represented in the deal?  Also, who does the listing agent work for?  You got it, the seller and not you!  Most times it is wiser to have an agent solely representing you and your best interest.  Why put yourself through all the brain damage.

Of course we all know that a builder would love for a buyer not to have a buyer's agent.  In the case of new construction, the seller (builder) still pays the buyer agent's commission.  Who do you think the on site agent works for?  And the transaction may be more cut & dry and seem like you may not need one.  However, this is so often not true. 

First of all, there are so many things that can happen that you will need a seasoned professional to help you navigate through - deadlines, options, re-sale considerations and of course the possible construction errors that may likely come up - those are just some examples, there are more.  It is also not set in stone that the home price is the firm price in new buildsBuilders are very good at creating a media frenzy of lotteries, lines and wait lists for new releases.  But the fact of the matter is they are hurting right now and they will negotiate.  You can often negotiate more than the incentives offered by the builders.  You just need to know how to go about it.  It's not as straight forward as it may seem - perhaps you can negotiate on some upgrades, or the lot premium, maybe just have the landscaping thrown in. 

In the end, if you can have professional representation that is usually paid for by the seller, why wouldn't you?  Someone mentioned to me once that they thought that they could do it all themselves and save some money (because the seller wouldn't have to pay a commission.  Which by the way, statistically almost never happens) I told them maybe, and I bet you could also cut your own hair or fill your own teeth! 

Posted by

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Search For Homes Button

Steve Scheer, REALTOR®
Denver Realty Partners

385 Inverness Parkway #140
Englewood CO 80112
720-849-6101

If you would like more information on the Denver area or more information on Highlands Ranch homes for sale or any other of the south Denver suburbs, contact Steve at 720-849-6101or read his Denver Real Estate Blog.

Denver Realty Partners on FacebookDenver CO Real Estate on Flickr iconsteve scheer twitter iconsteve scheer linkedin iconsteve scheer youtube icon

©2007-2014 Steve Scheer Denver Real Estate and Relocation

Comments (11)

Steve Scheer
Realty Oasis - Metro Brokers - Highlands Ranch, CO
Highlands Ranch Real Estate - Denver Real Estate
So of course I wouldn't expect anyone (unless you were really good, or really daring) to cut your own hair or fill your own teeth.  And you shouldn't try to buy a home without a buyer's agent either, especially when the seller will be the one paying for the service. 
Mar 25, 2007 12:13 PM
Anonymous
Judith Clausen

Great piece, Steve.

Of course, as an Exclusive Buyer's Agent, I totally agree!  EBAs never represent sellers, so there's never any conflict of interest.  EBAs specialize in serving the needs of buyers.  That's all we do.  So after a few years we get to be experts on the buying side. 

Nothing wrong with using a buyer's agent who also represents sellers, but consumers had better be sure they know whether the firm represents the seller of the house they'd like to buy.  That presents a conflict of interest, and even though the real estate professional who represents the buyer in this situation says they can represent faithfully the consumer's best interest, they can't, because being a buyer's advocate is prohibited by law when the person representing the buyer works for the firm representing the seller.  They're no longer an "agent" but a "transaction broker," a person who helps the consumer through the buying process, and they have no fiduciary obligation to the buyer.

Complicated, yes.  That's why consumers need to be sure they know in what capacity the person representing them is serving.  Exclusive Buyer's Agents only represent buyers, so they never have any conflict of interests, and they can faithfully advocate for the buyer throughout the process.  That means going to bat for the buyer all the time, even if it conflicts with the agent's own interests.

Mar 27, 2007 07:54 AM
#2
Steve Scheer
Realty Oasis - Metro Brokers - Highlands Ranch, CO
Highlands Ranch Real Estate - Denver Real Estate

Hi Judith,

 Thanks for the great response.  I do represent both buyers and sellers.  Although I clearly explain my role with them in all the many situations, they are often still confused.  Especially when looking at new construction, buyers often don't know the benefits of having their agent represent them or that they even have that choice.  Unfortunately, buyers tend to go out and look at new construction without their agent and after registering with the builder it may be too late for the agent to represent them if they decide to buy there. Agents just need to inform their buyers of this in the beginning so they can avoid this situation. 

With such a large purchase as a home, it just makes sense to have an experienced agent working for you.

Mar 29, 2007 07:37 AM
Margaret Woda
Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc. - Crofton, MD
Maryland Real Estate & Military Relocation

Great post, which I find by going to your winning relocation package - Congratulations!

Regarding Judith's comment, it varies from state to state.  We don't have transaction brokers in MD, we have disclosed dual agents - i.e. 2 agents in the same company, with one representing the buyer and one the seller.  No single agent can ever represent more than one party at a gime.

Mar 16, 2008 01:59 PM
Laurie Mindnich
Centennial, CO

Hi, Steve- I'm interested on your "take".  I left Denver in 2002 (worked for builders, as well as CC Realtors and Perry & Butler-1980's.  Then, more new, with less resale).  Buyer agency was the rule of thumb in the 1990's-up to 2002, with most properties co-oping (not much double ending).  Are more buyers calling off of signs now?  Just curious- the internet has impacted all areas of this business, it seems!

Apr 01, 2008 11:18 AM
Steve Scheer
Realty Oasis - Metro Brokers - Highlands Ranch, CO
Highlands Ranch Real Estate - Denver Real Estate

You know Laurie, I really don't get a lot of sign calls even when I have a lot of listings.  It seems like most real buyers have an agent already often with a buyer agency agreement.  What I do see more of is those buyers calling or emailing me about listings they have seen on the Internet with questions.  I think most buyers without an agent are mostly with builder deals - mostly because they don't realize that they can (and should) have one and it costs them nothing.  By the way, I was with a builder for a while here too, we were probably in it about the same time. 

Apr 01, 2008 03:42 PM
Laurie Mindnich
Centennial, CO
I always preferred a Realtor with a buyer when it involved new construction- the deals tended to go more smoothly (from an on-site perspective).  It's more needed now than ever.
Apr 02, 2008 12:52 AM
LaNita Cates
REMAX of Joliet - Joliet, IL

Great post. It's amazing how many people build new construction and think they should listen to the sales person who works for the builder to "guide" them in making decisions!

Apr 02, 2008 01:45 AM
Steve Scheer
Realty Oasis - Metro Brokers - Highlands Ranch, CO
Highlands Ranch Real Estate - Denver Real Estate

Laurie -  I agree.

LaNita - Yes, Its a much better idea to have someone representing you and so many do not.   

Apr 02, 2008 05:21 AM
John Slocum
Premiere Property Group, LLC - Vancouver Washington - Vancouver, WA
Broker, SFR - Vancouver WA Real Estate

Great Post Steve.  In our Vancouver WA market we also feel strongly about Buyers having only a Buyers Agent represent them.  Also, when we list a property the listing agent won't represent the buyer rather, we'll have a designated Buyers Agent -- one who is expert on the home but does not know the Seller's bottom line, work with the purchaser.

John & Kathryn

 

Jul 01, 2008 05:28 AM
Steve Scheer
Realty Oasis - Metro Brokers - Highlands Ranch, CO
Highlands Ranch Real Estate - Denver Real Estate

Alexander - I think making sure you are represented no matter what is the key.  So often here people try to go at it alone - particularly with new construction just because thee don't always realize that they have options.

Jul 12, 2008 08:58 AM