I'm not one of the home inspectors who think that one and only one type of inspection fits the needs of all people in all circumstances and only one price. Instead, I offer choices. Occasionally, I arrive at an inspection fully prepared to do one of my BASIC or STANDARD inspections, only to convince (and it usually takes very little convincing) my Client to choose a different service. One of yesterday's inspections was one of those circumstances:

When I arrived, I immediately noticed the new roof. Unfortunately, I also noticed that it had some installation problems, and I saw that walking to the property from across the street where I had parked my car.

My Client was a general contractor and had already looked at the electrical system and all the small stuff. He was going to gut & renovate, so all he really was interested in was hiring someone to go up on the roof and inspect the plumbing and foundation in the crawl space. So I switched from a $349 BASIC inspection to a WALK inspection at $110 per hour. Ultimately I spent two hours with him, charging him $220, saving him $129. Here's my report:

  • All walls, exterior and interior, were damaged. (He already knew.)
  • Zinsco electric panel present. Replace it. (He already knew.)
  • Roof needs ridge row shingles. (He didn't know.)
  • Foundation had buckled at southeast corner (see Figure 1). (He knows how to repair it.)
  • Plumbing leaks under kitchen sink and in crawl space under bathroom. (He has plumber friends.)
  • Cast iron main drain and laterals still in place, and deteriorated. (He has plumber friends.)
  • All windows missing or damaged. (He's replacing with multi-pane windows.)
  • Wall heater did not work. (The HVAC tech was there at the same time selling my Client a new Trane heating and cooling system.)
  • Water heater did not work. (He's replacing it with a tankless water heater.)
  • Exterior grading. Omitted at Client's request. (He's re-landscaping, and if you saw the "landscaping," you'd know why.)
  • Excessive deferred maintenance. (That's why he's buying the place; great price and superb view of San Diego State University across the way; see Figure 2.)

 Buckled foundation  Figure 1. Buckled foundation wall.

 Buckled foundation  Figure 1. View of San Diego State University.

I sure hope I wasn't too nitpicky. I'm sure I wasn't since the husband-and-wife Realtor refer me exclusively. They love my "soft sale" reports. LOL

P.S. For railroad and train fans, that line in the center of the picture, clinging to the hillside and just above the freeway (you can see the two bridge pillars at the far right center), is the San Diego Trolley line to the real cool underground station at San Diego State.

 
Post is included in group: Trains and Railroads
Post is included in group: Southern California Real Estate Forum
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: Fixers, Flips, and Rehabs
Post is included in group: Everything California

9 Comments on Was this home inspection report too nitpicky?

AUG
21
2008
Localism Sponsor

To me "nitpicky" refers to items that are considered cosmetic. It seems that most of the items that you identified were material defects (structural, HVAC, electrical, plumbing). I have had inspectors make a big deal about a missing electrical outlet cover, a tree that was going to be too close to the house in a few years, a faded spot of cement in a pool...now that's nitpicky!!

6:41am • #1
164,632 Points

Inspectors can be tough.  We have one inspector we call: "Deal Killer".  I like my inspector.  Very through but not nit picky.

6:46am • #2

Inspectors need tob e thorough, but not scare the buyer over silly things like GFCI outlets.  Sounds like you did a good job!

6:54am • #3
I agree with Julie -nitpicky to me is mentioning cosmetic vs. functional issues. I prefer a thorough home inspection to review with my buyers or sellers, particularly when there is a lot of deferred maintenance.
7:11am • #4
545,084 Points 10 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Hey, Folks! Thanks for stopping by.

I'm looking forward to a great day! Hope you are too.

8:39am • #5

No outlet covers=crispy children.  Sorry to be blunt but I always report on safety issues than can cause death whether or not it seems nit-picky.  But that's a good idea for my "avoid getting a "nit-picky inspection report" blog series.

P.S. Calling out no GFCI outlets is nit-picky.  Geez, come on, think about the safety of your clients. 

11:51am • #6
575,654 Points 18 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Russel,

Looks good to me. I would always call out missing GFCI's and covers but, also, try to make it clear that it is not in the realm of buying a house that costly to repair, at least in most cases unless the wiring is toast.

1:12pm • #8
545,084 Points 10 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Hey, Folks! Thanks for stopping by.

I don't consider anything relating to electricity or gas utilities to be nitpicky. After all, they both have the potential to injure or kill, and very quickly. What makes them even more dangerous is that one can't see them, unlike water.

1:50pm • #9

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Img_9340 Ambassador_large

Russel Ray, San Diego home inspector

San Diego, CA

More about me…

Russel Ray, Property Consultant

Address: 7000-31 Saranac Street, La Mesa, CA, 91941-3315

Office Phone: (619) 341-0173

Cell Phone: (619) 341-0173

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find CA real estate agents and San Diego real estate on ActiveRain.