This poor seller from another state just called me to ask if she could hire me to handle her contract negotiations. Seems she has received an offer directly from an out-of-area selling agent on a home she owns in Midtown Sacramento. To save on the commission, a friend who "understands real estate" advised her to hire a discount broker to list her home. Now, this friend is out of town, and the seller has nobody to advise her.
It's bad enough that she's not here locally and doubly bad that the offer came from a buyer's agent who doesn't work in this neighborhood. She says it's a lowball offer, the buyer is asking for a lot of concessions, plus a big chunk of change for pest work, among other demands. The buyer's agent has asked her for a counter offer.
I'm wondering if she is really saving any money by not hiring a full-service real estate agent to represent her. She hired a discount broker to plop the listing into MLS, and that agent, apparently, isn't willing to provide any other service, much less put a lockbox on the property. According to the seller, if she accepted the buyer's offer, she would lose around $60,000, which is about five times more than the services of a full-service broker would have cost her.
She sounds like she doesn't know what she signed when she signed the listing agreement nor does she seem to understand what is expected of her at this point. That's a scary position to be in, don't you think?
Photo: Big Stock Photo
Comments(18)