Ar_home_b_search
 

Lets take a look at the real impact of the subprime meltdown.  I am even hesitant to call it a meltdown. Media buzzwords always seem to have a "hype" to it that both captures attention and yet doesn't quite tell the story right. I digress.

This is a purely numerical analysis designed to determine the impact it will have on purchase transactions. I heard this in a Mortgage Market Guide telephone conversation late last week and here it goes:

  • Last year almost 20% of mortgages were subprime (lets assume this is still the case) 
  • In today's market 40% of transactions are purchases
  • This means 8% of all purchase money is subprime 
  • If 20-30% of applicants can not obtain a subprime loan due to tighter guidelines then it follows that there will be a 2% reduction in the number of purchase transactions

To put this in perspective when mortgage rates increase by 0.5% there is a corresponding 2% decrease in the number of mortgages written.

Hence from this we see that the current subprime "meltdown" is equivalent to a 0.5% increase in rates. That is why Mr. Bernanke said yesterday the fallout is contained and why the Fed didn't lower the Federal Funds rate in response to the subprime crisis.

 

5 Comments on Putting the impact of subprime in perspective

MAR
29
2007

Shailesh, number do not look bad, but at the grass root level, after 100% financing gone, people have to come up with real money to buy, that mean any where from 5-10 percent for the purchase price. That is not very easy when medain home price is in 600's here in Orange County CA. It is not only the subprime but the panic created with the subprime that is going to effect the home sales and above numbers do not show that psychological factor.

Check out my blog here

http://www.namneet.com

 

 

11:03am • #1
1 Featured Post

Another consideration is the ripple effect several million foreclosed properties suddenly dumped into the market will exact upon overall market value.  The drop in value, however insignificant to those who have plenty of equity, will reduce or eliminate the possibility of a mortgage refinance for those with exploding ARMs, or balloons coming due.

ForeclosureFocusUSA

 

11:34am • #2
177,087 Points 5 Featured Posts
Shailesh, that does put things in perspective...good post.  I think it's actually a good thing that they are tightening up on subprime loans because that will hopefully mean less foreclosures!  I haven't seen the numerical analysis this way-thanks for the info.
11:56am • #3

Shailesh,

Thank you for your numbers. They are fascinating. The fashion in which you have chosen to present them makes several assumptions that can not be verified. What you are stating is that 60% of sub prime loans were used in refinancing. I can find no statistical data to support that and I can not find any lenders in this market that believe that is anywhere near the truth. There were some 228's that were refinanced in another 228 but the subprime problem did not rear it's ugly head on the no doc loans that were made to people that could afford the payments.

This problem is the result of shoddy lending practices coupled with agents that spent more time looking at commission statements than what would have been best for their clients. The parasites that exist in our industry are at the root of this.

Foreclosures are increasing. Most of them at this time are first payment defaults. First payment defaults have a better cure ratio than full blown defaults. A closer look will reveal that all the bells and whistles of option arms and negative amortization loans have become more expensive than many buyers undestood.

The continuing damage may be dimissed with a minor comment by Mr. Bernake now. I think he will have more to offer as the volumn of bad loans comes to light. Empty homes and shattered dreams will have a significant impact on the nightly news. This is not anywhere comparable to a .05 move in rates. To think so is pure folly and to actually believe that indicates a greater understanding of the problem is needed.

john macarthur
12:28pm • #4
4 Featured Posts

Hello John, 

You said: "What you are stating is that 60% of sub prime loans were used in refinancing."

Sorry for the confusion. In my breakdown what I meant to show was that since 40% of transactions last year were purchases I wanted to determine the percentage of those transactions that involved subprime loans. So, I multiplies 20% (the percentage of all loans which are subprime) by 40% (the share of purchases) to get 8%. I did not mean to imply that 60% of refinances were coming from refinancing.

You also said: This is not anywhere comparable to a .05 move in rates 

Also the rate movement is 0.5%!

You make some very good observations. Thanks for taking the time to share you thoughts!

Shailesh
azmortgageguru.blogspot.com

2:20pm • #5

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 

Aimee Ghimire

Phoenix, AZ

More about me…

Phoenix Home Loan Expert (www.aimeeloans.com)

Address: 1201 S Alma School Road, Ste 8950, Mesa, AZ, 85210

Office Phone: (480) 346-8383

Cell Phone: (480) 516-1819

Email Me


I am a mortgage professional serving the Greater Phoenix market. This includes Phoenix, Mesa, Gilbert, Scottsdale, Chandler, Tempe and surrounding communities. I am with PrimeLending. When it comes to Arizona mortgage loans I have the expertise, the experience and the professionalism you should expect. I have been working in the Arizona home loan market for almost five years and have a history of satisfied borrowers.



Blog Directory, Find A Blog, Submit A Blog, Search For The Best Blogs



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find AZ real estate agents and Phoenix real estate on ActiveRain.