What exactly is going on with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

Fannie Mae was created in 1938 as a government agency with a mission to buy mortgages from banks and issue bonds on the bond market using the pool of mortgages as collateral for the bonds. This process was designed to add liquidity to the mortgage marketplace and supply banks with extra funds that could be used to allow more Americans to buy and own homes. Fannie Mae became so successful and profitable that in 1968, the government decided to spin it off into a private, shareholder-owned company. In 1970, the government chartered Freddie Mac as another shareholder-owned company to provide some competition to Fannie Mae and further provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the housing market. Since then, the companies have grown so large that they own or guarantee roughly half of all mortgages in the United States.

Recently, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been experiencing a crisis of confidence in the financial markets. The main fear right now is that Fannie and Freddie will be unable to continue to access short term funding that is required for them to continue their normal business operations. Financial institutions count on short term loans and lines of credit to engage in their business activities - please reference the article in this series entitled "What exactly is the problem today with banks, financial institutions and the financial markets?"

In other words, there is a fear that Fannie and Freddie will experience a "run" on their business similar to what happened with Bear Stearns in March 2008. With this in mind, the Fed and US Treasury Department are proposing that Congress officially give them the authority to step in and rescue Fannie and Freddie if they can no longer get funding from the open market. The main argument in favor of this strategy is that it would cause the market to relax and resume doing business with Fannie and Freddie as normal because of the unlimited express backing of the US government. If Fannie and Freddie have an unlimited line of credit with the government, doing business with them would be equivalent to doing business with the US government. They might never need to tap the government line of credit because its mere existence would inspire confidence among the other players who do business with them. It's kind of like a school boy who brings his daddy to the playground with him on every school day - no one would dare mess with him!

The main concern with this scenario is that it is not a sustainable long-term strategy to have US taxpayers support the risky business practices of for-profit companies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Interestingly enough, Fannie and Freddie do not wish to be completely privatized. Their preferred status and ties to the government has resulted in record corporate profits when times are good and a taxpayer-funded safety net when times are bad. However, just because the companies engage in business that benefits the public doesn't mean that they deserve to be fully backed by taxpayers and the federal government. After all, many other businesses also benefit the public such as food service companies, energy companies, auto and transportation businesses, etc. It is not the mission of the government to rescue for-profit businesses when they run into financial problems.

With that in mind, many individuals and institutions have called for completely privatizing Fannie and Freddie and eliminating their ties to the government. Breaking up the companies and completely privatizing them may very well be a viable long-term solution and prevent a crisis of this magnitude from occurring in the future. Nevertheless, it is also important to prevent the current credit crisis from creating a full-scale meltdown of the US housing market and financial system - which is exactly what would happen if Fannie and Freddie were to blow up. The key is to weather the current crisis without sowing the seeds of the next one.

Bob Gammache has been originating mortgages since 1991 and is the author of a mortgage education website at www.nva-mortgage.com. Bob has also been instrumental in the development of the Internet Dream Machine, a turn key business opportunity useful to many Realtors and Loan Officers trying to survive the housing slump.

 
Post is included in group: Mortgage Originators
Post is included in group: Mortgage Professionals
Post is included in group: Mortgages
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: True Mortgage Professionals

8 Comments on What exactly is going on with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

AUG
26
2008
1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor

Hi Bob, Great Post. My understanding is that Fanny & Freddy tried to get private funding, but could not get it. Hence to only option is a bail out by the Feds. What is your solution?

2:01pm • #1

Endre- You are correct. Both of their common stock shares are off by 90+ percent and their preferred shares (which are heavily owned by the big banks are under pressure. My read on this is that if the preferred shares go down to a certain point, Secretary Paulson pulls the trigger on the bailout. That would not "kill" the market but guidelines will tighten even more. I wish I had a solution!

2:08pm • #2
AUG
27
2008
151,285 Points 6 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Bob,

Their increasing capital needs are getting difficult to meet, especially with the mind boggling drop in share price. That share price will not go back up until the market believes that the shares will become worthless due to a federal takeover.

I did read an article that predicted a bailout would not be necessary. If the market starts to believe that, maybe the stock price will have a significant.

Thanks for the good post.

Richard

10:39pm • #3
AUG
29
2008

Perhaps the display of government support was posturing - intended to boost private investor confidence.  Not the shareholders, but the entities, institutions and traders who buy Fannie and Freddie's mortgage backed securities.  Maybe the government recognizes what might happen if the secondary mortgage market breaks down.  They get it right sometimes!

6:34pm • #4
AUG
30
2008

Richard and Dominion Mortgage. Thanks for the response. They do get it right sometimes and Richard, I may have read the same article. The longet we go without a bailout, the more likely it will not happen. The Fed has essentially given them carte blanche and that will certainly help.

Bob

4:44pm • #5
SEP
07
2008

Well, looks like today is the day the government steps in. Honestly, I thought it would be last week. If you think the ride has been bumpy so far, hang on to your hats!

Bob

9:55am • #6
AUG
11
Hello. Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. I am from Cambodia and also now teach English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Feature low lux cameras, higher resolution." THX :P, Harmon.
Harmon
7:08am • #7
SEP
01
Sorry. Money doesn't always bring happiness. People with ten million dollars are no happier than people with nine million dollars. I am from Guyana and too poorly know English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "There were two terms who had androgenic many blood all over their things, becoming them occur like problems." With respect 8), Cheri.
Cheri
8:09am • #8

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Bob Gammache, CMPS

Smith Mountain Lake, VA

More about me…

Carteret Mortgage

Address: 105 Clearcreek Ct, Moneta, VA, 24121

Office Phone: (540) 719-1115

Email Me

Daily updates of the financial markets and their impact on mortgage rates. Float or lock suggestions for the day


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find VA real estate agents and Smith Mountain Lake real estate on ActiveRain.