So on Friday it was leaked that the government is taking over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. On Sunday it was official. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have now been taken over by the federal government. But what does it mean for the real estate market, mortgage interest rates, and the US economy.

First let's look at what it means for mortgage rates. I would expect that the government takeover will result in lower mortgage rates, possibly a full point lower. Why? Basically the Fed has been struggling to lower mortgage rates for the last year in an attempt to assist the troubled real estate market. The Fed has lowered prime rates several times in an attempt to pull down mortgage interest rates, with mixed success. Now with full control of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (which provides insurance for most mortgages in the US) they will have much more control over the mortgage market and mortgage rates. As long as their objective stays the same, we can expect lower rates.

What does the takeover say about the current situation in the real estate market? This should have been obvious from all the events that preceded this but the takeover shows that the real estate market is in serious serious trouble. The federal government doesn't just take over large companies on a whim, especially an administration with a Republican president that believes strongly in free markets. This is not simply a government takeover. This is the largest takeover in US history. Basically the takeover happened because it was believed if nothing was done we were headed for economic catastrophe.

How is this going to effect the real estate market? Although the takeover is a bad sign about our current situation it should have a positive effect on the real estate markets moving forward. First lowering mortgage interest rates should be quite a boon for the real estate market. Lowering rates lowers the effective cost of a house. And historically lowering rates has a positive effect on real estate values.

Additionally, if the Fed is smart they will reduce some of the mortgage restrictions Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have created in the last year. While I would not like to see the mortgage market return to the free-wheeling lending of a few years ago, some of the current rules are bizarrely restrictive. The lending environment typically works like a pendulum moving from one extreme to another. Currently lending restrictions are not just stricter than what we saw during the real estate boom a few years ago but they are more restrictive than anything we have seen in the last 15 - 20 years. Hopefully a federally controlled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can help return us to normal as far as lending restrictions.

Lastly the government takeover could put taxpayers in the lurch for billions in loan losses. In the short term the government is going to have to infuse money into Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. They have been losing money for quite some time and that is not going to change overnight. If the market improves over the next year or two, which was likely before, and the takeover improves the outlook for the real estate market, the government will have to infuse maybe a total of 20 to 30 billion into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to get them back to financial solvency. That sounds like a lot but to put the number in context, the cost of the Iraq War has been running at about 100 billion a year for the last 7 years. So a 20 billion dollar expense is an unpleasant but manageable expense. But if real estate market gets a lot worse over the next two years, I can't think of the adjective to describe how expensive things could get.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provide insurance for 5 trillion in loans or about half of the residential loans in the United States. Because of the takeover, the federal government now provides insurance for 5 trillion in loans. If we are just on the cusp of severe real estate problem that means that the federal government is on the hook for 5 trillion in loans. That's more than double the entire federal budget for 2007 and 10 times what the US has spent on the Iraq War. So as taxpayers we should hope things improve soon because if the rate of foreclosures skyrockets over the next 2 or 3 years, we are basically going to be paying for it.

Does this mean the federal government is insane? It depends on how you look at the issue. This was certainly a risky move. But on the other hand allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to fail would have devastated the US economy and likely lead to a severe depression. So doing nothing was equally risky. And while taking over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae was a risky move for taxpayers, in a depression those that keep their jobs have to make up for all the lost tax revenues for the large number of people that lose their jobs. So in summary the federal government found itself in a tight spot and decided to bet the farm they can fix the real estate market and for our sakes, let's hope they are right.

Ki lives and works in central Texas. He provides a search of the Austin MLS on his site along with current information on the Austin real estate market. His site also provides a tool that show current trends for mortgage interest rates.
 
Post is included in group: Market Updates
Post is included in group: Mortgage Bankers
Post is included in group: MortgageInterestRates
Post is included in group: Mortgages
Post is included in group: The Economics of Real Estate

13 Comments on Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Takeover: What Does It Mean?

SEP
08
2008
1 Featured Post

Great post.

It should be very interesting to see how this all plays out.

Have a great week.

 

1:03am • #1

Excellent post Ki.  I do not believe the issue was whether or not the FED was going to allow Fannie and Freddie to fail.  I believe their move was a proactive decision that needed to be made.  It stops the talk of whether or not Fannie and Freddie will or will not go bankrupt and it places total control in the FED having the ability to dictate market activity.  When you analyze the number behind what they are doing it is possible to see how this could be financially beneficial for all parties involved.  The key is what will they do afterwards. 

1:18am • #2
201,122 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Great post and well written where even I could understand it.  Thanks

4:39am • #3
105,366 Points

I agree with Rosemary - very well written - thanks for sharing!

5:53am • #4

They say markets are driven by greed and fear.  This move should go a long way to quieting some of the fear.  Thanks... One of the best posts I've read on the topic.

5:57am • #5

I guess I have a different outlook on all this.  I see it as this; THE GOVERNMENT OWNS OUR HOMES!

What's to keep them from selling the mortgages to China? To Japan?  After all, our government wants to merge Mexico, United States and Canada into the North American Union.  Canada doesn't want us because we're bankrupt.

I think this is very bad that the government owns so much real estate now.  Very bad.  We're trillions of dollars in debt.  Our toll roads were sold to foreign nations.  Our parks were sold.  Do we even own the Statute of Liberty?

I think China (or someone else) is going to buy up the mortgages from our government.

What happens to the United States when our land is owned by other nations?  China already helped pay for the IRS tax rebates Americans received. (I think it was China).

Does this mean the government doesn't have to push eminent domain now, since they own the homes?

SharkGirl
7:53am • #6

All righty now . . . I see someone let SharkGirl loose on the unwitting masses :-)

Ki is correct about mortgage rates falling - in fact there's been a good rally in the MBS market this morning - and that we the taxpayers are theoretically on the hook.  But, this was basically the only move available to restore some sense of faith in the mortgage market.  It won't stop home prices from falling in the distressed markets around the country, but lower rates will certainly help some distressed homeowners refinance out of potential trouble and help with affordability for new purchasers.

The biggest issue in the market today is confidence and this move deals directly with that issue.  Unfortunately, the long term implications of government ownership of the GSE's has not been thought through.  We basically have a 12-18 month window to get things stabilized and come up with a plan for long-term suppport of the mortgage market.  My 2 cents.

10:15am • #7

SharkGirl - makes some valid points.  When we went off of the gold standard the dollar became a debtor note.  We can't pay off the national debt because that's where the money came from to buy the mortgages in the first place.  However, in general I agree with the post.  In the short term it's a good decision turn all of the control over to the federal government they can certainly make better decisions about what is good for us than we collectively can.  Owen

11:37am • #8
294,636 Points 100 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Thanks for this excellent post.  We talked about the implications of this situation at length during our office meeting this morning.  I appreciate how you have explained the situation in a way which is fairly easy to follow, although I am aware that there is more to it than you can cover here.  I'm bookmarking....

3:43pm • #9

"Today the GSEs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac merged with the Federal Reserve Bank, the US Treasury Department, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase to form Gosbank USA. The DJIA rose 280 points on the news. " So it goes....while in the short term, this is a 'shot in the arm,' in the long term, Sharkgirl has a finger on the pulse of reality. This is the 'fix' for the addict. And the fixes just keep on coming. So we sell out to every entity that will foot our overdrwn bill, and taxpayers (us) carry the rest, and what do we have to show for it in the end? Pay now or pay later. Except the debt becomes exponential over time, with each new lender implosion. Watch for more bank failures, make no mistake about it. When the FDIC fails, then what? 

Genie Heroux
7:32pm • #10
SEP
09
2008
Outside Blog

Great post Ki, followed by some great comments!  Wow!  I love to see mind's in motion! 

I'm not sure what I think...I just want a market correction so that real estate is affordable again!  Before the FED took over, I was against a bailout because I thought the only way for a correction to take place would be for more banks to go under, more foreclosures, tighter lending standards, etc.  However, if that means another great depression, I don't think I'm ready for that!

Now that the FED has taken over, I don't think it necessarily means that the market isn't correct itself, but perhaps it will just cushion the fall.  After all, the affordability index still has to fall quite a bit in most areas across the country. 

We are 3 years into the next 75 year financial cycle.  The last one was the great depression. 

Thanks for the Great post!

Tara

12:51am • #11
Localism Sponsor

Thanks for the good insight to the current situation. I did an AR search for Fannie Mae and found at least a dozen cogent posts with interesting perspectives on the situation. What a great resource. Thanks and Aloha

1:39pm • #12

Thank you for expaining it so well. Great post. I think I am starting to understand it all.

2:51pm • #13

This blog does not allow anonymous comments

 
Rainmaker_large

Ki Gray - Austin Real Estate

Austin, TX

More about me…

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find TX real estate agents and Austin real estate on ActiveRain.