Special offer

Another Real Estate Tax Loophole closed - Important to know

By
Real Estate Technology with Guardant Investments, Inc. BRE# 00592120

This Capital Tax Code change caught me by surprise as I just learned about it.  I had not heard anything about it and perhaps other real estate professionals are in the same situation.  In the past I have had numerous clients that have used this section of the IRS code and several that are currently taking advantage of the code (including myself) but will now be affected as this goes into effect January 1, 2009.  Unfortunately there is nothing preventative that can be done.  A synopsis of the Internal Revenue Code follows:

A Modification of Internal Revenue Code §121

The federal government recently heightened the restrictions for those who seek to exclude capital gains on the sale of real property held as a primary residence under IRC §121.  This legislation will go into effect on January 1, 2009.

IRC §121, also known as the 121 exclusion, permits homeowners upon the sale of real estate they have owned and lived in as their primary residence to exclude up to $250,000 of the capital gains ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) that would have otherwise been recognized.  To qualify for this exclusion the real estate sold must be, or have been, the primary residence and lived in by the taxpayer for any two of the last five years.  Certain exceptions apply for the two year "lived in" requirement.  Taxpayers can take advantage of the 121 exclusion once every two years.

The careful utilization of the 121 exclusion has permitted taxpayers to implement strategies to take full advantage of its benefits.  Such examples include:

  • A taxpayer acquires investment property, not purchased as part of a 1031 exchange, and then converts the investment property into their primary residence.  The taxpayer, after living in the property for at least two years, may sell the property and take the full 121 exclusion.

  • A taxpayer acquires investment property as part of a 1031 exchange and then converts the investment property into their primary residence.  In order to take advantage of the 121 exclusion the taxpayer must live in the property for at least two years and additionally must have owned the property for at least five years. 

The latest change to IRC §121 restricts a taxpayer from taking the full 121 exclusion for periods of "non-qualified" use prior to it being held as their primary residence.  Non-qualified use is any use of the property other than as a primary residence (i.e. second home, vacation home, rental).  A "qualified" use is then, by default, any period in which the property is held as a primary residence. 

Upon the sale of the property, the capital gains attributable to the Non-qualified time period prior to its conversion to a primary residence is no longer excludable.  Any periods of Non-qualified use after conversion to a primary residence is not counted against the taxpayer, as long they would otherwise qualify for the 121 exclusion.

The allocation of capital gains between the Qualified and Non-qualified periods involves a simple fraction that takes the total capital gains associated with the sale and divides that amount between the respective periods.  The Qualified period represents the amount of the capital gains that can be excluded and is determined by the number of years the property was held as the primary residence over the total years of ownership.  The Non-qualified period represents the amount of capital gains that can no longer be excluded and is calculated using the same fraction, the number of years held in Non-qualified use over the total years of ownership.  Keep in mind, any Non-qualified periods after the conversion of the property to a primary residence is not counted against the taxpayer.

For example, a taxpayer acquired real property in January of 2009 and owned the property for eight years.  The property was held for investment for the first six years.  It was then converted to the primary residence for the last two years of ownership.  Of the total capital gains associated with the sale only one-quarter (2/8) can now be excluded under the 121 exclusion.  The remaining three-quarters (6/8) can no longer be excluded as they are allocated to the Non-qualified period.

These changes will undoubtedly impact those that have acquired investment property and intend to change the character of the property to their primary residence in order to take full advantage of the 121 exclusion. "

Gail Gladstone
Gladstone Group & Long Island Business Brokerage - Huntington, NY
Brokering Success

Good information; well aware of most of it, but I live for learning one new thing at everything I read or do and you have definitely given me some new information.  Thank you.

Sep 12, 2008 10:50 AM
Real estate with a purpose
Our Father's Houses Realty - Easley, SC

Thanks for the info.  I'm surprised I hadn't heard about it!

Sep 12, 2008 11:01 AM
Tim Maitski
HomeAtlanta.com - Sandy Springs, GA
Editor of MaitskiREport.com

This is a big change.  I always thought that was a great strategy and contemplated using it eventually.  Now they have changed the rules and burst my bubble.

Sep 12, 2008 01:58 PM
Keith Webb
Guardant Investments, Inc. - Fullerton, CA
GRI

Gail...Glad to provide some education.

Tim...I have had many clients move into long term rentals to avoid that taxation over the years.   I will have my two years in on January 5, 2009.  Talk about bursting my bubble.

As I indicated in my blog, I had not heard any discussion over this change until this week. Since this is a code change it means our legislature has been at work.

Sep 12, 2008 02:19 PM
Lynda Eisenmann
Preferred Home Brokers - Brea, CA
Broker Associate ,CRS,GRI,SRES, Brea,CA, Orange Co

O.K. Keith Webb,

So how in the world are you?  (And btw, it's late , so I didn't read your post (yet)so my comment has nothing to do with it)...but I wanted to say hello!

Good to see you in the Rain.

Oct 31, 2008 05:31 PM
Cheryl Powell - The Powell Team
Southern Homes of The Carolinas - The Powell Team - Harrisburg, NC
Concord,Harrisburg & Charlotte NC Area Real Estate

What a big pain in the *** our tax code is.  More government red tape to deal with and more records to keep!

I already heard about this change and it is going to cost a lot of people a lot of money!

Oct 31, 2008 05:35 PM