Ar_home_b_search
 

I was getting ready to write the latest version of my series, Power Quotes Series, when I came across a post from Carol Smith. Her post was about the "Dreaded DPA" and if it was going to be OK. And this is what got me back to thinking that someone needs to set a few things straight on DPA. Now mind you, Carol is not one of those people that need to be set straight. The ones that need to be set straight are the people that are against DPA.

The biggest misconception to the DPA "going away" is that this will force the customer to have to bring 3.5% of their own money to the table. Some Realtors contend that if they can not do that, then they do not need to buy. Those same Realtors are the ones that call their loan officer and want to know why a particular condition from underwriting cannot be overlooked. But, that is a chicken of a different color. Time to get back on track. The misconception with this is the fact that the down payment actually DOES NOT have to come from the buyer. It actually can be a gift as long as the SELLER is not a part of it.

When people think that DPA is dead and gone, it is not. The DPA programs are fighting along with a bunch of Realtors, Lenders, and others that think the DPA programs that are SELLER based program are helpful to people that need them. Yes, I am the first to admit that people abuse these programs. It is like any programs that are out there. Give a person a little and they want a lot. It is the American way. And for those of you out there that think to yourself that you do not act that way, you need to wake up.I have been associated in the credit industy for over 20 years and I see it everyday. If the sale is 2 for a $1, you want it to be 3 for a $1.

Anyway, back to the subject at hand. Companies like NEHEMIAH help people acquire homes. They goal is to facilitate the down payment. If you need anymore than that, read all about downpayment assistance here. And, so that everyone can be up to date on what Carol was telling us, here is an exertion from her post:

According to the Groundswell website, HR6694 passed the House Financial Services Committee on September 16th and is headed to the floor in the next few days for a full vote.

So, let's get back to the misconception theroy at hand. A potential buyer wants to buy but does not have the downpayment is hampered due to the fact that they do not have the option for DPA or have the funds in their account. Case in point is, the down payment can actually be a gift. Now mind you, I did not say "borrowed". I said gift and a GIFT LETTER will have to be supplied stating that this money will not have to be repaid. It can come from any number of sources. A few examples would be their family, their church, their school, their friends, a local or national charity, or every the city, county, or state government. And it is not limited from just these.

So, just because programs like Nehemiah are possibly going to be shelved, DPA is not dead and gone. If you need more information, then please call or email me.

About the Author

If you are in the market to purchase a home or even refinance an existing loan and you want a loan officer that will walk with you every step of the way, then contact Danny or Rich of the Thornton Team at Home America Mortgage today. We can have you pre-approval in as little as 4 hours. You can visit our website or send an email to or call us @ 865-951-0522.

 
Post is included in group: Dedicated Bloggers
Post is included in group: Mortgages
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: Realtors Needing the services of the Lending Powers
Post is included in group: True Mortgage Professionals

22 Comments on DPA; The biggest Misconception

SEP
19
2008
115,040 Points

Danny, perfect post for those that have no understanding of DPA. It is a significajnt program with benefits to MANY people, most importantly the buyers. I agree that there have to restrcitions, but that appears to be happening anyway. I support and am glad to see it coming back. Active Rain has to have had a play in it turnaround.

Thanks

Bo

9:02am • #1
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Bo, as with many companies like the one I work for, we have all done our parts from writing emails, making calls, to writing post like this one. I just hope that the message gets out there.

9:03am • #2
254,145 Points 3 Featured Posts Hit Router

I've been one of those that said DPA is sort of like legal money laundering.  You pay a fee to make an otherwise illegal contribution legal.  It's part of what got the mortgage industry into the trouble they are in now. 

Now don't get me wrong.  DPA has it's purposes. But comparing the idea of a true GIFT from a family member or church to a paid DPA program is comparing apples to fish...just not near the same thing.  A true GIFT does not require a "processing fee".

9:15am • #3
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Ron, I do not believe that I compared anything here. All I said is that DPA is not the only option to a customer. And with that said, the money can come anywhere. But this also shoots a hole in the theroy that the buyer must have a "vested" interest.

As for the "money laundering" quote, I think that it is the biggest crock that someone dreamed up and everyone liked because it backs their cause. Bottom line, DPA programs come from the equity in the home. If it is not there, then the buyer does not qualify.

9:32am • #4
141,514 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

I think that DPA does have its place and of course the companies like Nehemiah will make a fee. I am not opposed to a company making money for performing a service. It would be rather difficult and somewhat of a double standard to ask one party in a transaction to give up part or all of their commission or fee for forced altruistic reasons.

10:22am • #5
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Rich, I agree.

11:35am • #6
624,134 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Danny, kind of sounds like the idea of a charitable contribution from a non-profit thinly skirts the idea of a shell oraganization created to find a loophole. Will financing options become simpler or more profound after September 30 ? That's a question I'm hearing ripple throughout the community. Thanks for posting the info. Have a fine weekend.

11:46am • #7
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

David, gift contributions have been around for years and I can name several charities that have been set up to help people buy homes. The funny thing is, not one of them ask for the money back. They have their own criteria for the person to apply and just because it is there does not mean that a person automatically gets the DPA.

12:04pm • #8
211,928 Points 4 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Danny - the DPA programs have played a major part in the opportunities for first time buyers.  It's true that some loans have been made irresponsibly, but that's like saying because 10 people had car wrecks that all cars should be taken away. 

The abuses of one group of people, small group in comparison to all the mortgages written, should not overshadow those with legitimate and responsible intentions. 

There is no magical cure for this problem.  But it seems unfair to withold a valuable option from everyone because a few couldn't keep their priorities straight.

And - thanks for the mention.  I appreciate it!

12:05pm • #9
624,134 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Good points, Danny. Many thanks for elaborating on the process. Will be interesting to see how things change in the coming months in the real estate financing arena.

12:10pm • #10
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Carol, what gets me is the people that think it is this issue that causes the problem with mortgages going bad. I could name thirty other ones that are worse.

12:11pm • #11
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

David, I am sure that it will be interesting, though I do not look for many changes to come around till 2009 in the mortgage industry.

12:14pm • #12

Well said Danny - While there still may be some hope that the seller assisted DPA programs may in fact survive, there are and have been for years, many other charitable and municipal grants and down payment assistance programs available to help those in need.

Just like any other programs offering a hand-up there is bound to be abuses. I am currently working with two recently divorced single moms who have to find new housing for their families and want to keep their kids in the same neighborhood and schools, and without some sort of assistance to help them with a home purchase, this wouldn't be possible.

12:39pm • #13
143,149 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Danny - The big thing about DPAs is that they are perfect for a down market. When houses don't sell, sellers are willing to help make them sell. It gets property moving.

1:56pm • #14
SEP
20
2008
208,136 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

ultimately, it is the lender to decide if they want to make a loan to a buyer , if they think the buyer is qualified, - an outright ban on DPA is a form of redlining in my opinion

12:59am • #15
811,199 Points 91 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Sorry for not agreeing with you. With many markets still declining in value the DPA purchaser may quickly find themselves in a negative equity position.  The DPA's have killed the Atlanta market, and no I am not sorry to see them go.  If more persons had equity positions we would not be seeing a tsunami of foreclosures across the nation. 

1:17am • #16
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

James, that I can agree to.

Jim, the flaw that I see with what you say is the fact that DPA programs are not responsible for killing the Atlanta market. FHA required 3% down regardless of where it came from. So, in theroy with what you say, the decline of the market would effect people that did not use DPA programs the same as the ones that did. 3% down is 3% down, no matter how you slice it. I will agree that if the DP was larger, we would not be in this situation. With that being said though, when a bubble is created like that in Florida and California, it really does not matter what the DP is unless you are in the range of 40% down.

8:10am • #17
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Fred and Donald, I am not sure how I miised your comments, but here is my responses:

Donald, abuses can be limited if you make the customer apply for the DPA.

Fred, I do not knowabout getting property moving. I am one that thinks that a customer should have to apply for DPA, not just be given it.

5:51pm • #18
SEP
21
2008

  Great blog for the a/r community, have a wonderful week.

12:18am • #19
SEP
24
2008
333,729 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Lynn, thanks.

11:01pm • #20
SEP
25
2008

Well said. I look forward to DPAS returning like Ameridream and Nehemiah which will help some of us through this time. We need to work off inventory.

What about the little known USDA Rural Housing Downpayment Assistance program? This program is still alive and well for rural areas to individuals making less than 52k. The contribution is capped at 6%. What are your thoughts on this program?

12:39am • #21
Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

USDA is a great program as long as the property is in the eligible area.  Just go here:http://eligibility.sc.egov.usda.gov/eligibility/welcomeAction.do?pageAction=sfp&NavKey=property@11.  You type in the property address and it will tell you if it is eligible.  The borrower can even go to 102% of the purchase price if the appraised value is at least that high. 

10:46pm • #22

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
12-09-2009_danny_thornton_003

Danny Thornton

Knoxville, TN

More about me…

R & D Management

Office Phone: (865) 951-0522

Cell Phone: (404) 354-1115

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog