Ar_home_b_search
 
9-19 ken calvert
I know we're all keenly aware of the crisis in our energy supply and production. We (Americans) are told we are consumers of 'more than our share' of world energy supplies yet our production continues to lag, constrained by limits on exploration and development of proven domestic reserves. This includes the realistic availability of off-shore fields (some being explored by competitors right under our noses), our ability to explore in ANWR and the opportunity to develop our shale resources to make a meaningful contribution to worldwide oil production and having a voice in the pricing of that commodity.

The Democrats have recently seen the light that the majority of Americans support 'drill now, drill here, cut prices', yet they cannot for the life of them put aside their slavish devotion to environmental extremists and other interests conspiring to continue our reliance on foreign oil in what T. Boone Pickens calls the 'greatest redistribution of wealth in our nations history'. If you've seen the latest Democratic Party hoax masquerading as oil policy, it is intended as nothing more than a sop for a gullible electorate so they can point to it and say 'see, we heard you, we're trying to do something - those pesky Republicans wouldn't support our energy initiative.' If you don't believe me, just keep your eyes on the news next week.

Anyway, here's a synopsis I received from one of my Congressmen this morning. If you're not familiar with Ken Calvert, shame on you. He is the original author and sponsor of the long running House Bill designed to keep banks out of real estate. (Did you know one of the original Senate sponsors was Hillary Clinton?) Ken comes from a real estate background himself and has been an ally of Realtor and private property rights issues on the hill for years. Read this and then compare it to what the Pelosi Press has to say next week. 
<!-- body, td, div{ font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; color: #000; } #date{ color: #fff; font-size: 11px; } a.mlink{ color: #fff; text-decoration: none; text-align: center; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px; font-size: 11px; } a.mlink:hover { text-decoration:underline; } a.wlink{ color: #fff; font-size: 11px; text-decoration: none; } a.blink { color:#0f316a; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11px; } a.wlink:link { text-decoration: none; font-size: 11px; } a.wlink:hover, a.blinkhover{ text-decoration:underline; } #title { background-color: #627C96; color: #fff; text-indent: 4px; padding-top: 2px 0px; font-size: 11px; } #clickthru_footer { text-align: center; } #clickthru_footer_navigation { text-align: center; padding-top: 3px 0px; font-size: 11px; } #content_main{ padding: 2px 4px; } #content_left_sidebar{ text-align: center; padding: 4px 2px; } div.form_content{ background-color: #dfe0d6; width: 92%; border: 2px solid #000; line-height: 16px; text-align: center; padding: 5px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } div.form_container{ text-align:center; padding-top:10px; padding-bottom:10px; } p.formHeader{ text-align: center; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold; } p.submitbutton input{ text-align: center; font-weight: bold; color: #fff; border: #000 1px solid; background-color: #990000; padding: 2px; text-decoration: none; } p.submitbutton { text-align: center; } p.form_content p{ margin-top: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; padding-top: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; } td.font_footer { font-size: 11px; color: #000000; } p.formQuestion{ font-weight: bold; text-align: left; margin-bottom:3px; } p.formAnswer{ text-align: left; margin:2px 0; padding:0 2px; } p.formTroubleLink a { color:#000066} span.verdana_11 { font-size: 11px; color: #fff; } #clickbutton { border: 1px solid #000; color: #fff; padding: 4px; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; background-color: #990000; } small_font {font-size: 11px} -->
September 19, 2008
Please go to the following website to learn how you can support the troops
www.americasupportsyou.mil

Riverside County residents, go to the below website to register to vote
www.election.co.riverside.ca.us

Orange County residents, go to the below website to register to vote
www.ocvote.com

Survey Results


Do you support offshore energy exploration beyond the line-of-sight (approximately 25 miles)?

Answer Total
Yes 70.88%
No 26.18%
Not sure 2.95%

Do you believe offshore energy exploration should be allowed:

Answer Total
Anywhere offshore 43.05%
Beyond 25 miles 27.66%
Beyond 50 miles 3.26%
Beyond 100 miles 3.12%
Should not be allowed 22.91%

Do you believe coastal states should have a veto over whether or not offshore energy exploration is permitted 25 miles or more off their coast?

Answer Total
Yes 37.04%
No 52.92%
Not sure 10.03%

Do you think we can explore and develop domestic oil supplies while respecting and preserving the environment?

Answer Total
Yes 73.86%
No 19.64%
Not sure 6.50%


Dear Friends,
 
Only a week remains before Congress adjourns for the year and on Tuesday the Democratic Leadership forced an energy bill through the House that fails on many levels. A prominent Democratic Senator described the Democrat bill, H.R. 6899, “Dead on arrival.” 

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the Democratic and Republican Energy Bills:

 
I support an “all-of-the-above energy” solution that increases the production of American-made energy, including offshore energy. The Democrat bill does nothing to increase production of nuclear power, nothing for hydropower, and nothing to increase refinery capacity. This bill is a sham and it is unconscionable that Speaker Pelosi is planning to adjourn the House before providing meaningful energy reform.
 
I am a co-sponsor of the “all-of-the-above” Republican alternative, the American Energy Act (H.R. 6566) and on July 17, 2008, I introduced the MORE Act, H.R. 6529. Under the MORE Act, states will receive 75% of the royalties for oil and natural gas production beyond 25 miles off their coastline and the U.S. Treasury would receive the remaining 25%. If states elect to allow exploration and production within 25 miles of their coastline, then their share of the royalties would increase to 90%. At 25 miles from the coast, no evidence of energy exploration is visible from land under any condition. 
 
If we are serious about developing our own resources, we must provide a strong incentive to states to allow environmentally safe drilling off their coastlines. Under the MORE Act, the state of California could potentially receive billions of dollars in royalty revenue that could be used to fund education, law enforcement, state parks and many other vital programs for our state. 
 
Unfortunately the will of the majority of Americans, and Californians, is being ignored by Speaker Pelosi who refuses to allow for domestic development of our own resources. 
 
 
Sincerely,
 
KEN CALVERT
Member of Congress
 
Contact Information


Gene Wunderlich - Selling Southwest California Homes including Temecula, Murrieta & The Southern California Wine Country
subscribe to my blog southwestcaliforniaghomes.com

Remember, Don't wait to buy real estate - Buy real estate and wait.
copyscape
' Congressman Addresses Democrat Energy Bill Sham'
THE OPINIONS IN THIS COMMENTARY ARE STRICTLY GENE WUNDERLICH's PERSONAL OPINION. WHILE ANY REASONABLE &/or RATIONAL PERSON SHOULD AGREE, THESE VIEWS MAY NOT REFLECT THOSE OF ACTIVERAIN, COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE OR ANY  LOCAL, STATE OR NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS.
 
This post has been included in California Real Estate News
Post is included in group: Blatant Politics
Post is included in group: Dissent
Post is included in group: Politics And Real Estate
Post is included in group: Posts to Localism
Post is included in group: Silent Majority

17 Comments on Congressman Addresses Democrat Energy Bill Sham

SEP
19
2008
747,156 Points 72 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

This is great.....Kudos!  Keep up the good work.  I like the removing of the mask.....

1:41pm • #1

This is a tough problem.  If they fix it, Bush looks like a hero.  If they let Obama fix, then he is the hero.  If McCain gets in, then we won't have a fix for 4 more years.  Put the party politics aside and vote for America.

1:46pm • #2
1,545,239 Points 416 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

H.R. 6899 is a study in obfuscation.

It shouldn't get through the Senate.  There are a couple of Senators who can read.

 

1:52pm • #3
217,360 Points 33 Featured Posts

Randall - While there are any number of valid reasons an informed voter might reject McCain, please don't buy into the hype that he is McSame - four more years of Bush. The man has a track record demonstrating his ability to get along with both parties as well as the ability to go against both parties. McCain is anything but Bush redux and I say that as one who voted for Bush twice. I did it because I honestly felt he was the better candidate against Gore & Kerry. I still believe that today even though I also believe Bush is a chucklehead at best and may well be our least competent President since Jimmy Carter.

Lenn - Most can barely navigate the subtleties of Mad Magazine let alone 100's of pages of gibberish they are handed hours before a vote. Thankfully there are some Aids who can read and some legislators who will listen to them.

2:28pm • #4
345,738 Points 1 Featured Post

Gene ... thanks for the note ... and support for Congressman Ken Calvert and his efforts for Oil and Energy and our nation's capital.  Best wishes. Keep up the good work. Harrison

3:12pm • #5
SEP
21
2008

You people support Calvert? Are you nuts? They guy is a textbook study in political corruption.

He may have sponsored and voted for some good bills, but that's no reason to keep him in his seat. He's a crook, plain and simple.

Mud flats
3:52pm • #6
756,477 Points 16 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

My what debating going on here. California leading the way for America drilling for its own oil. Bravo!

4:24pm • #7
563,639 Points 17 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Mud Flats & Ed - two more who hide behind the anonymity of the internet and drop all kinds of inuendos. There might be some credibility if they went by their real identities, but, then again, maybe not.

7:16pm • #9

Gene leads with a congressman who surrounded himself with corrupt men who were bilking our country's defense appropriations, traitors in a time of war, right under this particular politician's nose.... on the plane to and from Saudi Arabia, and on the defense appropriations committee where this clueless hack sat with convicted traitor Randy Cunningham....and somehow, if you just knew my name, all your willful resistance to the truth....which I lay out, complete with links, right in front of you...would become clear and believable to you, is that what you're telling me?

Save the sermon for Gene.....this topic doesn't belong in dissent, it belongs in marching in lockstep with the "party line"....the one that is marching the country over a cliff!

You've lost the ability to discern right from wrong....and you say I am "the problem"? Do what "Raleigh", aka Ricardo did in reaction to posts by me that he couldn't challenge, but couldn't accept....close the thread, delete my posts, but the facts have a funny way of returning to bite you in the.....

Ed LeFevre (Curious Sort)
9:41pm • #10
403,774 Points 16 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Ed - I think you miss the point. Our energy situation is not good. I don't care which party you support, we need an energy solution. "All of the above" would be an excellent solution.

9:48pm • #11
403,774 Points 16 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Gene ~

Congratulations this post is now featured in the Blatant Politics Group of Active Rain.

9:49pm • #12
403,774 Points 16 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Gene ~

Congratulations this post is now featured in the Silent Majority Group of Active Rain.

9:50pm • #13
SEP
22
2008
217,360 Points 33 Featured Posts

Dear Anonymous Ed - No I'll not delete your comments - I'll leave them for others to decide the validity of someone who posts anonymously quoting specious sources (who the hell is CREW and why would I care what they think) and fails to address the point of the original post. The original post deals with the sham Democrat bill purported to expand domestic oil exploration when it in fact does quite the opposite  - somehow that whole argument went right over your head. Maybe the fact that its true causes you some hearburn.

Then you launch into an attack on Ken Calvert alleging that because he accompanied Duke Cunningham on a trip abroad, somehow he is painted with the same broad brush. Doesn't seem to be any evidence of wrongdoing but because he was on this one trip he's 'surrounding himself with corrupt people' by your reasoning. And somehow he has also become a stooge of big oil. Then because his real estate company has made money off some land deals surrounding MarcH AFB, he is even more corrupt. Never mind that he has not been accused or indicted of any wrongdoing, but we'll just take your say so because...'if we just knew who you were'. We'll also ignore the fact that numerous savvy investors made a good deal of money betting on the future disposition of land around March AFB going back to before it was decommissioned - of course they're probably all corrupt hacks too.

Then you take off on a whole new tangent that apparently is intended to go to the heart of why we're suffering a worldwide oil crisis - because Shell was going to close a refinery in Bakersfield and there was a leak in the Prudhoe Bay pipeline. Mmmmm, sorry. That has exactly what to do with offshore drilling and ANWR?

About the only point I agree on is that we need to conserve more - but that certainly isn't going to end the oil shortage. There will be a time when we can reduce our dependence on the automobile as our primary mode of transport but that time is still a long way off. Until that day arrives, we'd better do something about developing our domestic supplies and reduce our dependence on foreign oil. While I agree that domestically produced oil doesn't necessarily stay home but becomes part of the world wide supply - you can't honestly believe that we would continue to import 2/3 of our oil from abroad if we were producing it right here at home.

Anyway, Anonymous Ed, thanks for stopping by. You certainly are a 'curious sort'. Always interesting to get a different twist on reality without actually using drugs myself. Sorry you don't think my post belongs in dissent. If Tchaka feels the same way he can pull it.

2:49am • #15
756,477 Points 16 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Gene ~ My what these liberals will go to to get the propaganda out there. This Ed has hijacked your post with his liberal spin he calls truth. But again offers no facts, just spin.

8:45am • #16
217,360 Points 33 Featured Posts

Nicholas - reminds me of the instructions we got in a negotiations workshop many years ago. If you've got the facts on your side - pound on the facts, if you've got the numbers on your side - pound on the numbers, if you've got nothing on your side - pound on the table.

9:59am • #17

Gene, the republican argument for "more drilling" is predicated on the premise that the risks to the ecosystem and recreational beaches, i.e. "tourism" and beach proximity property values, inherent in loosening anti near shore drilling policy, will somehow have a dampening influence on price of crude oil.

You ignored what I posted that countered this, even if the overwhelming reportage of the fact that Rep. Calvert is either a dupe or a criminal....(You don't know who "CREW" is? It figures....), has no influence on you.... you failed to mention that I documented the facts that adding 6.4 percent of ACTUAL new domestic production, in or near 2008, had had no dampening effect on price....and the market has known this increased output was coming since 2002.

So, with plenty of doubt as to how increased drilling in the coming years would have any near term affect on world market price, and being in the business of marketing real property, what could possibly motivate you to tout Calvert's pro drilling, campaign PR? Why do you think Jeb Bush, while he was FLA governor, used his ties and influence to power, to keep the lid on off shore drilling?

Bush’s Offshore Drilling Plan Splits Florida GOP | Newsweek ...

An Oily Mess

Bush's offshore drilling plan splits Florida's GOP

"The most anticipated reaction came from former Florida governor Jeb Bush, who sought to limit offshore drilling while in office (and, some say, helped keep his brother's advocacy of drilling in check). "The world has changed" as a result of skyrocketing oil and fuel prices, the president's brother said at an education summit Thursday. "We need a national energy policy that includes increasing supplies of oil and gas inside the United States." However, he continued, it should be done in a way that protects the state's coastline. His proposal: that Congress reconsider a plan he and former California congressman Richard Pombo put forth unsuccessfully in 2006. It would have imposed a 100-mile protective buffer around the state while also opening up millions of acres in the central gulf for new exploration. (Currently, drilling is prohibited within 125 miles of the Panhandle coast and within 235 miles of Tampa Bay.)"

...and could you tell me....why does "the wing", never consider how they look, aligning themselves with or posting the positions of the openly corrupt....i.e., Calvert and Pombi, if there is a desire to be taken seriously.....don't you "get it"?

May 19, 2006

Richard Pombo's Long Winter
The controversial California congressman is in political trouble
by JON MARGOLIS | posted 02.21.06

This must be the winter of Richard Pombo’s discontent, or it would be if they had winter in California.

It isn’t just that his plan to privatize 15 national parks and other public lands went kerblooey, or that he found it prudent to give away embarrassing campaign contributions. It isn’t just that three Democrats are seeking to run against him in November, or even that two Republicans plan to challenge him in the primary as he seeks his eighth term in the U.S. House of Representatives.

There are other troubles. First, Pombo, the powerful chairman of the House Resources Committee, got "Abramoffed." He also got Hurwitzed. And perhaps most humiliating of all, the press discovered that a supporter had attempted a reverse Siegenthaler...."

To outsiders, it looks like you guys are an alignment of corrupt. anti-environment, wealthy, conservative, race baiting, vote caging, bible thumping, partisans, but I suspect looks can be deceiving. Show me that they are.....show me how Jeb Bush teaming up with Richard Pombo in 2006, and leading with Ken Calvert's campaign literature in this blog, doesn't position you and Bush, starting your dialogues with one hand behind your backs.

If you want of come off as credible and reasonable, don't link your arguments to the Calverts or Pombos of your party....

 

 

 

 

Ed LeFevre (Curious Sort)
11:50am • #18
217,360 Points 33 Featured Posts

Curious Ed - If you want to come off as credible, try to stay on point. Yes, I know who CREW is - just not impressed. With an Executive Director that used to work for Biden and a staff whos  resume's read like a who's who of wanna-be Democrat activists, sorry - your credible and reasonable is still in the tank. Who's your next source of eminent acclaim - Move-on?

But I get your point - though you posit yourself as an outsider so you can tell us what 'we' look like, you are really a consumate insider of the liberal bent. Your arguments are tangential at best and often miss the point entirely. You trumpet your own demagoguery while trying to shift the focus from one issue to another to another with headlines that don't make sense, articles that don't support your point and specious sources only a liberal would even bother to quote, let alone trust. I understand you don't like Ken Calvert, I understand you are scared to death your Messiah may be cast on the scrap heap of historical footnotes come November, I 'get it' that you aren't conversant with the most basic laws of economics that if you increase the supply of a product you will reduce the price of that product.

Now get this - if you take off on another pointless rant in MY comment string, spouting allegations that are unfounded except within the narrow confines of your mind, refusing to deal with the issue of my original post, attempting to name call and belittle anyone who disagrees with you from the anonymity of your cute little slogan and continue to cast aspersions on an honorable man and friend, Ken Calvert, I will delete you. I welcome intelligent repartee and discussion on my posts, yours do not qualify.

4:07pm • #19

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?