Go to fullsize image

(Picture depicts U.S. House of Representatives vote on 8/29/2008 re: "Wall Street Bailout")

The Fallout Has Just Begun

How in the world did we get here to begin with?

Over a year has gone by since the real estate mortgage markets experienced the first day of "nuclear winter." For three or four years prior to July 2007, the credit markets for real estate lending were on fire. The thinking among the "smart money" on Wall Street was that under modern central bank policies, risk was a thing of the past. The economy would still move up and down, but in much gentler waves, and when things got rough, the Fed could fix it.

"Fix-It" Fed

Remember the Y2K crisis? The Fed fixed it. Remember the stock market difficulties after 9/11? The Fed fixed them. Remember the 1998 Russian ruble crisis and the ensuing credit market turmoil it caused? The Fed fixed it. Even when the stock market crashed in October 1987, the Fed fixed it.

These examples prove the Fed will not tolerate more than minimal corrections in the U.S. economy. Investors have now succumbed to the notion of "The Greenspan Put." This catchy little phrase essentially means there is no longer any risk in the markets that the Fed cannot fix by lowering interest rates. When global investors perceive no risk, investment capital flows everywhere. Investment prices go up and yields go down. Cap rates on real estate hit record lows. In this kind of environment, how do investors find higher yield? The answer is that they take on more risk. They make home loans to people who cannot afford to pay them back. Then they sell those loans to investors who do not know what they are buying. Who cares? The profits roll in, and that's all that matters!

Housing Wheel of Good Fortune

This new "no risk" era has had a remarkable impact on the housing market. Prices started rising and suddenly homes were no longer just places to live - they became investments as well. As prices continued to escalate, investors figured if one house was a good investment,why not buy more? TV shows began to reflect the popularity of investing inhomes. Investors could tune in to "Flip This House," then switch channels and watch "Flip That House."

 In post-World War II U.S. history, there have been three barriers to buying a first home: a down payment, a job and good credit. But early in this decade, the desperate search for yield prompted investors to buy riskier mortgages. Lenders had a new way of doing business. No job? No credit? No cash? No problem! They began making 100 percent loans without documenting borrower financials. Traditional risk management and mortgage underwriting standards that had served well for decades were swept aside. This new type of mortgage lender went by the name of Wall Street. Mr. Street did not need Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines because he did not sell his loans to Fannie and Freddie. He sold them to all kinds of investors all over the world. These loans were supposed to be virtually riskfree, rated AAA by the most reputable ratings agencies.

In 2006, prices stopped going up. Then they started to decline. Some people stopped paying their mortgages. Suddenly, investors decided not to buy more U.S. residential mortgages from Mr. Street. At this writing, those investors still are not interested in buying new mortgages. So guess who is left to make the loans? The traditional lenders who made them back in the good old days. Even an old friend - FHA - quickly evolved into the subprime lender of the 21st century.

And Then The Music Stopped

America finally woke up September 29, 2008, when, after weeks of debate and discussion about "our troubled lending institutions - especially MORTGAGE lenders - our beloved political leaders stepped to the plate and said "we are NOT going to allow the FED to fix it this time", and the picture above "tells the rest of the story."

 

 

7 Comments on Wall Street Implosion Rivals Nuclear Explosion

OCT
02
2008
114,412 Points Localism Sponsor Hit Router

Have no fear....God is still in contril and will work this all out to His glory...rest in HIM!!!!!

 

Kelly Willey christian realtor reo expert Harford county

12:25pm • #1

So is that the end of the story? What should the Fed do? What are the consequences of doing nothing?

12:26pm • #2
340,021 Points Outside Blog

Hi Phil

How did we get here, special interests, poor management and no oversight? Now we are about to let the same people who lead us down this path take charge of $700 billion dollars, doesn't make sense to me.

Good luck and success

Lou Ludwig

12:30pm • #3

Paul, As you well know that is NOT the end of the story - the next chapter began last night (10/1/2008) with the Senate passing the "new and revised" version of the bailout - oh excuse me, the rescue - bill........and the saga continues. The House of Reps has no choice but to pass this bill to "rescue" not only the US economy, but the global one also. Sad but true.....wonder what will happen the day THE FED runs out of bailout/rescue money..............?? 

12:35pm • #4
7 Featured Posts

All along, many smart people knew the "shell game" that was being played - like the CEO of Bank of America who bucked his board and did NOT go into subprime loans. That's why they're in such great financial health. The "story" was the one the media - and politicians and of their REALTOR puppets - wanted it to be: Excessive exhuberence. Everyone can "own a home" but nobody has to pay.

This isn't a 10-year phenomenon. Check out the Community Reinvestment Act which has been extorting banks to make terrible loans since the Carter Era. Money supply inflation is almost 15 years old, not just the 10 or 7 of the boomlet.

One more thought: The Fed never "fixes" anything. Every Fed action is a "correction" of their previous market interference. Fed interference prolonged the Great Depression by about 5 years; Fed "action" caused the US dollar to since to below-zero value causing the housing bubble. Government action created the "pseudo-banking" companiies Feddie and Fannie.

To call this a "banking" crisis is a lie; Bank of America - a "smart" bank - isn't in crisis. Fannie and Freddie hold 70+% of the bad loans. And they aren't "banks" - they are departments of the government run on political principles, not investment principles.

I love your graphic. It's not too far from the truth.

- Matthew

1:02pm • #5

Matthew, Thank you for your comment and a point well-taken. I absolutely agree with your synopsis. I've been in real estate for almost 25 years - long enough to have seen a lot of this same thing happen in the mid-80's. I just read the article on your web site "...bailout will destroy the housing industry", and again, I reluctantly agree with several points. My question to you is this - if not this bailout/rescue plan right now, then what and when? You saw the panic worldwide last Monday on the vote, so my question is can we afford NOT pass this bill? (p.s. - if I had been a House Rep I would have voted against it, also - my Mother always said I was the best at "cutting off my nose to spite my face!")

1:25pm • #6
7 Featured Posts

Phil:

Here are some reasons why this bailout is not only NOT NEEDED, but counterproductive:

First, see my posting from today:

More Proof the Bailout is Handout - and a Lie

before that, I had posted three days ago:

Whew! That Bailout Almost Destroyed the Housing Industry

Now, in both cases, the issue is this: Does the bailout address the ISSUE which isn't "bad mortgages" - since only 2% of mortgages are "bad" in the entire industry (and 50% of all homeowners do NOT even have a mortgage). So there's a lot of potential sitting on the sides - and this bill will only CHASE AWAY more Warren Buffet-style investments that are just waiting for things to become "properly priced."

All this bailout wants to do is INFLATE housing prices. We'd be off on the wrong pattern again because with inflated housing comes inflated commodities (oil, energy for example) and deflated buying power for consumers.

So that's the issue: INFLATION. If you want to stop the sliding of assets, you have to shore up their prices. BUYING them on the government's checkbook doesn't suddenly make them more valuable because it adds to the national DEBT. Which is a major source of our monetary inflation (or value deflation, if you want to look at it that way).

The dollar continues to decline because CREDIT and bad monetary policy made housing - real assets - worthless. And since everyone tied up their investments in mortgages/homes/ownership priced in dollars, it's a cycle downward until the dollar is supported.

Use $700 billion to BUY BACK dollars in the open market. Not flood the market with even more cheap liquidity.

It amazes me how we have turned control of our monetary policy to people who don't understand "Lemonade Stand Economics"

That's my idea; hope it makes some sense, Phil.

 

Be well!

Matthew

6:57pm • #7

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Phil Hutson

Austin, TX

More about me…

Austin TX Real Estate

Address: 2307 W. Parmer Ln., Austin, TX, 78727

Cell Phone: (512) 415-2213

Email Me

Blog about Austin Texas Real Estate and surrounding communities, including new and custom/luxury homes in Barton Creek, Lakeway, Westlake and Round Rock.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find TX real estate agents and Austin real estate on ActiveRain.