|
Find FL real estate agents and Santa Rosa Beach real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
3 Comments on "Hold-harmless clause (Inspector/Realtor)"
I question why, in this market, an inspector would desire to put a hold harmless agreement into his/her contract, which protects a third-party with financial interest in the transaction.
Often, E&O policies carry referring party indemnification coverage. For inspectors without E&O or a policy with this clause, I believe that the last thing the inspector should be concerned with in indemnifying another. First of all, I question the enforceability of such a clause in any court or binding arbitration. Unless the inspector has assumed liability for another, they may not prohibit one from suing anyone they can legally sue. But, again, why in the world would an inspector want to do this, and what incentive is there for attempting to insert himself/herself in a dispute between any two parties.
Joe because I want 2!. Because, I own my company and we decide what to do. You run yours however you please. Foe me it works!
sounds like "good business practice" to me. When I was appraising, I inserted a clause that said this appraisal and it's contents was only good for a specific length of time... it works.
The FHA 203k loan program has a HUD written and recommended "home owner/consultant" agreement with a hold harmless clause in it. If it is good enough for HUD it certainly is good enough for me.