10-15 water tour day 3
This is Part 3 of a 3 day
trip I recently took through the California Water Project.
You
can find Day 1 Here.
You
can find Day 2 Here.

Day
3, we spent a great deal of time examining the Sacramento
/ San Joaquin Bay Delta, the
Hub of the State Water Project and
the area around which most of the controversy swirls. An entire article
could
be devoted to the history of the Delta area but I’ll keep it
brief. Prior to
150 years ago the Delta was one of the largest natural estuaries on the
continent. Hundreds of species of animal, thousands of birds and untold
schools
of fish called this area home.
Following
the discovery of gold upstream in the
American, Sacramento and Feather Rivers, the Delta came to be looked on
as a
local source for food so piece by piece levees were constructed,
channeling the
flow of water away from the tule marshes which were
‘reclaimed’ as farmland.
Today nearly 700 miles of waterways criss-cross the Delta between mud
banks and
levees making some 57 ‘islands’ of rich peat soil
growing everything from rice
to oranges and almonds and cattle.
Water
making its way south from the Sacramento River must
first wend its way through this maze of intersecting canals, irrigate
hundreds
of acres of crops, run-off with 100’s of kinds of fertilizers
and contaminants,
mix with saline inflow from San Francisco Bay, pick up fish of every
conceivable native and non-native variety and then find the intake to
the State
Water Project at the Banks Pumping
Station.
Here’s
where it gets tricky. Southern
California only needs about 4 million acre feet of
water a year to
be happy. There are about 200 million plus acre feet that the Sacramento River dumps into the
ocean every year. Why is there a crisis? You
might say the Delta itself is the crisis but the Delta is also in
crisis.
Farming in the Delta produces about $1 billion worth of products a year
but the
cost to maintain the Delta in farmable condition amounts to about $60
billion.
Why? Many of the levees are over 100 years old and breaches are not
uncommon.
An industrious groundhog or rainstorm can cause a breach that takes
months to
repair. Many of the islands have subsided 20 – 30 feet due to
farming pressure
and pulling water out of the underlying water table. This destabilizes
the
levee areas further, as does pressure from the rivers on the other
side. In
other words, we’re paying nearly $60 billion to maintain
levees that reduce
water quality, destroy wildlife habitat, increase costs and increase
subsidence
all to support about $1 billion worth of farm produce.
Many
experts believe the Delta is unsustainable in its
present form. A hundred year storm event or earthquake (both severely
overdue)
would wreak havoc on the fragile and unnatural ecosystem that has been
built up
in the Delta. Not only would a calamitous event damage the Delta it
would
disrupt the flow of much needed water to the San Joaquin Valley, which
produces
as much as 45% of the nations fruits and vegetables, as well as cutting
off
most of the water supply to some 30 million Southern California
residents and
businesses, leaving only the meager resources of the Colorado River.
What to do? Well, what should have
been done was to
build what is commonly referred to as the Peripheral Canal back in the mid-80’s. As a
statewide
initiative it was narrowly defeated in 1982 because while 90% of
Northern
California residents voted against it, only 60% of Southern California voters voted
for it. The outcome would likely be far
different today as we would be joined in force by Central California
Farmers
who have seen a gradual decline in volume and quality of water as they
fight
their own water wars.

In 2006 Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger signed an
executive order to establish a “Delta
Vision” Blue Ribbon Task Force that would provide
comprehensive
recommendations for management of the Delta “We
must address the health of the delta because our current practices are
not
sustainable,” he said. Proposed solutions
takes many forms but primarily rely on the creation of a diversion or
peripheral canal that circumscribes the Delta area bringing high
quality water
directly to the head of the California
Aqueduct system. At the same time as many as 40 of the Deltas
57 islands
would be flooded to reduce the continuing subsidence, replenish
groundwater
resources, vastly increase habitat for environmentally sensitive
species,
return native migratory and tidal patterns, reduce salinity levels from
Bay
backwash and return the Delta to it’s former glory as one of
the nations top
estuaries.
In
the meanwhile we should all do what we can to
conserve. If you saw what all goes into getting a clean glass of water
to your
tap, you would be much less inclined to waste the 75% of water that
runs off
your lawn or even the extra 5 gallons a day that runs down the drain
while you
brush your teeth. The eventual solution will be time consuming and
expensive –
and no great project is without its challenges. America
used to thrive on projects
of epic and heroic proportion – today just trying to get a
freeway off-ramp or
a water meter installed can take years of studies, impact statements,
lawsuits
and appeals.
Meanwhile
there really is a water crisis looming.
Through good management our water companies have shielded us from the
worst of
it but a day of reckoning is fast approaching. You think the financial
meltdown
is bad today? Central and Southern California produce only about 20% of
our
annual water needs through rainfall and groundwater yet we consume
nearly 80%
of the states current water supply while the solution runs off into the
ocean. Wait
until a major quake or storm disrupts the Delta and Southern California has no water
and no quick fix in sight. You should be
pressing our legislators for a solution to this problem today to avoid
the
crisis tomorrow. They know there’s a problem, they just need
you to provide
their backbone to get it resolved. Call them today and tell them you support a solution for the Sacramento
Delta, build the Peripheral Canal.
For more information on how you can
get involved,
contact Mr. Phil Rosentrater, External Affairs Officer for the Western
Municipal Water District at prosentrater@wmwd.com.
You can also find more information about the peripheral canal by
visiting www.mwdh2o.com,
www.aguanomics.com
or www.latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace.
Gene
Wunderlich - Selling Southwest California Homes including
Temecula, Murrieta & The Southern California Wine Country
Remember, Don't wait to buy real
estate - Buy real estate and wait.
' Follow the Water Tour -
Day 3'
THE
OPINIONS IN THIS
COMMENTARY ARE STRICTLY GENE WUNDERLICH's PERSONAL OPINION. WHILE ANY
REASONABLE &/or RATIONAL PERSON SHOULD AGREE, THESE VIEWS MAY
NOT
REFLECT THOSE OF ACTIVERAIN, COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE OR
ANY STATE OR LOCAL WATER DEPARTMENT.
Nice series of articles, George. I'll be linking up to them today.
However, I want to alert you to one error. The peripheral canal would take the water to the head of the California Aqueduct, not the Los Angeles Aqueduct, which is in the Owens Valley, and is a completely different system than the State Water Project.
Regards!
Aqua Blog Maven from Aquafornia