You know, I realize that many of the recent first time buyer sales have used 100% financing to acquire their new homes, and that without that sort of loan program, many of these buyers would not have been able to purchase their homes at all. Never the less, I am pleased that it is becoming harder, if not impossible, to obtain that sort of financing now. 

Why, you ask?

We have seen a tremendous increase in foreclosures in our market, and the vast majority of those are houses that were purchased with no money down in the last 3 years. Years ago, when I bought my first property, it was extremely uncommon for a home buyer to use 100% financing. Virtually all home buyers came up with at least 10% down on the purchase. Most came up with more than that. Whether by intention or by accident, this resulted in home owners starting out with at least that much equity in their homes. So whether the value of the home went up, down, or stayed the same, the home owner could sell the house without having to fork over cash at the closing. Not so any more.

In our area, we were competing for a listing with several other agencies, in an area called Island Park, in Portsmouth RI, and virtually all but one came in around the same value for the CMA... all but one. All were lower than the owner expected she could sell the property for. All but one. The one of course that won the listing is the one that came in high on the CMA, at exactly the price the owner wanted to sell at. This owner has no ability to afford the payments on the current mortgage, and with late payments, cannot refinance either. We know this because we were working with the owner on the mortgage side as well as on the real estate side. Of course, the now listing agency referred the client to another mortgage lender, as it turns out, at the same office as our agent.

The problem with this, in our opinion, is that the listing agency has basically misled the client on the value of the home, just to get the listing. The home owner will be unable to purchase another home, and most assuredly will not get the price they are asking.

But the agent will soon enough tell the seller that the house cant sell at the asking price, and will most likely tell them to reduce the price... a strategy used by some unethical agents in every market, I imagine, just to get the listing. Of course, if they do sell the house, the woman will have to rent.

How is this relevant to the "no money down" issue I started this post with? The listing agent has told the seller that they can get that sort of financing on the new purchase. Of course, they have no idea about her credit situation, her late payments, or the fact that if she sells the house for less than she wants, she will still need to come up with cash at closing. She cannot come up with that cash, and the sale will, in all probability, be for less than she owes on the house.

We Realtors have to have a bit more integrity than this, in my view... what is your view?

Paul Silver, Owner

Focus Professionals, Inc.

Rhode Island Real Estate Services

 

12 Comments on 100% Financing a thing of the past, thank goodness

APR
13
2007
258,646 Points 102 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Years ago, when I bought my first property, there was no such thing as 100% financing

Paul, 100% down programs have been available since 1944

11:23am • #1
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

Brian:

Perhaps they have been available, but I know of no one in my peer group that actually used that sort of program... it was extremely uncommon at best... and I think, for good reason... 

Perhaps I was not clear enough in explaining that...

11:26am • #2
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor
Brian, the 100% is also still available, in principle, here... my point was that it is harder to achieve now than previously, and I believe that is a good thing...
11:28am • #3
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog
I agree with the premise to your article but disagree with your Title. There ares still some very good programs available for 100% financing. The difference is that they are now for good borrowers as you mentioned. I feel that there should be some sort of recourse against Realtors and Mortgage Brokers making promises they can't uphold. If a Realtor says he/she can sell a home for a certain price then they should have something to lose if they can't. A mortgage Broker should not be making any promises until they have a credit approval...
11:29am • #4
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor
there... been clarified...
11:33am • #5
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

there are programs available, yes... but I think it a very very bad idea... just my opinion... even for what you call "good borrowers" since I know people with previously good credit, who were classified as "good borrowers" when they obtained the 100% financing, and who now are in foreclosure, choosing to abandon the house rather than fork out some $30K to sell it, out of pocket... they are no longer "good borrowers"

Things change... and so should people's approach to lending, borrowing, and listing tactics... 

11:36am • #6
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

100% financing doesn't always need to mean that there is no money available or that they are purchasing more home then they can afford. I have borrowers who would rather keep their assets liquid or invested elsewhere. Others will pay down their 100% financing when their current property sells. Like any loan, it should be one of many tools that are used appropriately.

This has not been the case in the last few years as greed in all 3 sides has often over ridden common sense.

11:43am • #7
479,889 Points 151 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Paul... I made a comment in Susan's post on what you said.  And I do agree with you a little and I made the comment that it should be a little more strict. But Larry brings up a great point. With today's rates being low, that you could still get a 100% loan with a rate under 7%, why not. If I had $50,000 to put down, I could make that money work for me, than just plopping it into the home. Let the house work for you and not work for it. This is not the 70's and 80's to where most people just made extra payments to pay off their home early. There are many ways to make that money work for you, outside of your home. 

And his last statement is right on. Again.... there can be points made for both sides, but lets educate these consumers from both angles and not just based on ones opinion. I just wrote this post yesterday and your opinion was brought up also. And I think I gave a very good reply to this issue. Hope you don't mind....  just let me know, but I think it does pertain to your post. Creative FHA financing -- No money out of pocket from the buyer!!! -- Part 1

                                                                                                            jeff belonger

11:59am • #8
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

I understand all the various perspectives presented here, but never the less, I have to say that regardless of our stake in the matter, therejust are some people who cannot afford to buy a home, and they should not be led into high risk scenarios without completely understanding the issues and risks, and while some may prefer to invest their money elsewhere and finance the home purchase with 100% loans, this scenario is rare, in my opinion, since the real estate investment is often a better value than stocks, bonds, or other vehicles.

Never the less, while it may be a valid option for some, I am willing to bet that the greatest proportion of these loans do not go to such folks as can afford them, but rather to buyers who simply do not have the down payment available, and are barely able to make the mortgage payment... this is not a statistic, but rather a perception I have, being intimately involved in a mortgage brokerage myself.

If it works, and is ethical, do it... if it is simply a way to get a barely capable home buyer into a home, I strongly advise against it. 

12:59pm • #9
258,646 Points 102 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Paul,

Rhode Island is a Navy state.  I'm surprised that you haven't run across the 100% loans made available to Veterans there.

9:44pm • #10
APR
14
2007
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor
I have run across them... I have also seen several Navy men recently who cant afford to keep their houses...
8:12am • #11
5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Paul, I agree that the bar needs to be raised by Realtors and loan officers in who should be buying or applying. Unfortunately, we can say no to someone and the guy/gal down the street say yes.

But education is the key. I recently talked a young couple out of buying at this time. I could have done the loan by committing fraud and let them know so. I also let them know that they could go down the street and another LO would probably do the deal as a Stated loan. But there would still be issues that could result in them being implicated in fraud. Hopefully they chose to listen to me and in Dec. they will be bale to buy a home.

1:26pm • #12

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Rhode Island Real Estate, Buyers Agents, Paul Silver

Newport, RI

More about me…

Rhode Island Real Estate -- Focus Professionals, Inc.

Address: PO Box 356, Portsmouth, RI, 02871

Office Phone: (401) 293-0131

Cell Phone: (646) 522-2262

Email Me

All about buying, owning, and selling real estate in Rhode Island And Southeastern Massachusetts & Cape Cod Bristol County MA

Follow Paul on Twitter

Or On FaceBook



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find RI real estate agents and Newport real estate on ActiveRain.