Ar_home_b_search
 

Here is an update of a few changes in Missouri law that may have an impact or relate to sales transactions in Missouri:

HCS SCS SB 1033 - Real Property Transfers to Counties - Acknowledgements Now Required

In Missouri (except the City of St. Louis), grantees generally are not required to execute the deed conveying the property.  This law changes existing law by requiring that property transfers (except water and sewer line easements) to a county (whether by dedication or donation) be signed, proved and acknowledged by the county commission as a condition for recording.  Comment:  The City of St. Louis had delinquent owners deed the property to the Mayor or the City.  It is unclear what the motivation is for this particular piece of legislation.  It may be simply to clarify how and when public roads or other improvement are dedicated to county for purposes of county maintenance.

HCS SCS SB 907 - Real Property Transfers - Invalidates Transfer Fees

Specifies that any transfer fee, declaration, or covenant which requires the payment of a fee to a specific person upon the transfer of real estate will not be binding on or enforceable against any subsequent owner, purchaser, or mortgagee of any interest in real property.  Any lien claiming to secure the payment of a transfer fee under a transfer fee covenant recorded in Missouri on or after September 1, 2008, will be void and unenforceable.   Comment:  This law was intended to address a developing real estate investment practice whereby subsequent transfers of property triggered transfer fees payable to the original owner or to the original listing broker.  The law only prohibits this practice prospectively for covenants recorded or after September 1, 2008.  There are several exemptions.  However, transfer fees associated with the sale of condominiums are not adequately addressed or exempted by this law and may be subject to challenge.

SCS SB 1009 - Real Estate Transactions - Good Funds Law

All moneys accepted by a settlement agent for closing a real estate transaction must be certified funds unless the buyer, seller, or lender is a financial institution.  Real estate transactions of less than $2,500 are exempted from the requirement that they be certified funds.  Comment:  Prior limit of $10,000 was reduced to $2,500.

SCS HCS HB 2188 - Mortgage Fraud - Penalties

Specifies that licensed real estate brokers, salespersons, and appraisers can be brought before the Administrative Hearing Commission and lose their license for committing mortgage fraud. A licensee who is criminally convicted of mortgage fraud will automatically have his or her license revoked; and the Missouri Real Estate Commission or the Missouri Real Estate Appraisers Commission within the Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions, and Professional Registration may maintain an action in circuit court. The court may impose a civil penalty of up to $2,500 per violation and may grant other relief determined just and proper.  Other provisions relate to mortgage brokers and other lenders.  Comment:  The MREC already had the power to revoke or suspend a person's license for fraud.  The only real change is that revocation of the license is mandatory.

HCS SB 958 - Tree Trimming by Electric Suppliers - Tree Removal Expense

Allows electric suppliers to trim, remove, and control trees and vegetation that threaten the safe and reliable operation of electrical service. If any tree which is trimmed by an electric supplier dies within three months as a result of the trimming, the owner may request in writing that the electric supplier remove the tree at the supplier's expense. The electric supplier must respond to the request within 90 days.  Comment:  This law is intended to balance the need for tree trimming to avoid the disruption of electrical service against the rights of property owners.  It provides for notice to the owner prior to non-emergency trimming as well as the right to demand the removal, at the electric supplier's expense, of trees that die as a result of tree trimming by electric suppliers.

Note:  The opinions and statements contained herein represent my personal opinions and observations.  These blog entries are not reviewed, endorsed or approved for publication by Gilded Age, L.L.C., Gilded Age Sales, L.L.C. or Preservation Real Estate Advisors, L.L.C.

Disclaimer:  The author is a licensed attorney.  However, the opinions and statements contained herein are for informational and discussion purposes only and shall not constitute the provision of legal advice.  Nothing contained herein shall establish an attorney-client relationship.   Readers are cautioned to seek legal counsel in their state before using or relying upon any of the information contained herein.

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________

PREA SIGNATURE REALTY

Download Property BrochuresView Our Listing PresentationWatch Our Property Videos on YouTube

PREA Signature Realty is a full service brokerage located at 1709 Park Avenue in the Lafayette Square neighborhood of the City of St. Louis.  PREA Signature proudly serves the following city neighborhoods:  Lafayette Square, Soulard, Benton Park, Benton Park West, Downtown Loft District, Forest Park Southwest, Central West End, Tower Grove East, Tower Grove South, Compton Heights, Shaw, The Hill, Dogtown, Carondelet, Holly Hills, St. Louis Hills, Dutchtown, and the Other Historic Neighborhoods of the City of Saint Louis, Missouri. 

The opinions expressed herein represent the opinions of the author only and do not reflect the opinions of PREA Signature Realty.  All photos and written content were produced by PREA Signature Realty.  All Rights Reserved - PREA Signature Realty (2009).  This content may not be reproduced or reprinted, except for Active Rain re-blogging, without express written permission of PREA Signature Realty.

For more information, visit our website at www.PREASignatureRealty.com or contact Ryan Shaughnessy at 314-971-4381 or send an email to Ryan@PREASignatureRealty.com

 
This post has been included in Missouri Real Estate News Saint Louis City County, MO Real Estate News Saint Louis, MO Real Estate News Lafayette Square (Saint Louis, MO) Real Estate News
Post is included in group: Midwest Rainers
Post is included in group: MissouriListings
Post is included in group: Real Estate Law
Post is included in group: Real Estate Rookie
Post is included in group: Realtors®

7 Comments on 2008 Real Estate Law Update (Missouri) - Legislative Action

OCT
23
2008
649,744 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Very nice to see you keep up with the law changes and post to your ccolleagues.  It wouldn't surprise me a bit to learn that you volunteer at your local Association of Realtors.

Please remember me if your hear of anyone moving to "The OC".

Best regards.

Michael Caruso, Broker ABR ABRM CRB CRS GRI

2007 President, Orange County Association of Realtors

4:09pm • #1
227,064 Points 25 Featured Posts

Michael:  I think it is important for my sales staff to understand the most recent changes to Missouri law.  The post was really written for them.  However, I thought these changes were interesting enough to post to others.  Private transfer fees typically were a creature of new construction developments.  Recently, there were promoters of "get rich quick" schemes that promoted private transfer fees as a means of creating a long term perpetual income stream for property owners.  It worked something like this - owner records covenant in deed requiring payment of transfer fee on subsequent transfers.  However, the first transfer after recording of the covenant was exempt.  After that, a transfer fee was due on each subsequent transfer.  I don't know which fees were targeted - but the practice is now prohibited - at least prospectively.

5:41pm • #2
OCT
25
2008
781,899 Points 71 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Ryan - Excellent work keeping consumers up to speed on the changing laws in your area.

1:19pm • #3
227,064 Points 25 Featured Posts

Bill:  Thanks for the post.  Although I have reviewed each of the laws and the comments and summaries are mine, the real credit should go to the Missouri Bar which publishes and disseminates the Missouri Legislative Digest to members of the Missouri Bar (including me) that highlights all legislative enactments for the past legislative session.

4:42pm • #4
179,456 Points 5 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Thanks for sharing this with us Ryan. I agree that it is important to follow the proposed changes and to inform our associates. Being blindsided is never good.

10:22pm • #5
APR
03
2009
4 Featured Posts

Ryan,

My question is a general one and I would greally appreciate your input:

Dear Active Rain Professionals,

 

I need your help to determine how the majority of real estate professionals would handle the following situation.  Put yourself in the place of the agent in this scenario.

 

You are working with an investor who has instructed you to ‘find good deals'.  You call him or run into him occasionally and tell him about several properties that he buys.  You know what type of properties he is interested in and you have a good idea of property values in the area where you work.  The properties he wants are generally those that he can ‘flip' and you have placed back on the market and ‘re-sold' a couple of properties for him already.  There is an opportunity to purchase a lot that you think is well priced, but you are unable to get the mortgage by yourself, so you call this investor and ask him if he would like to partner with you in the purchase.  He does and you get the mortgage in both of your names and buy the property for investment. You understand that you can enjoy a long and prosperous relationship with this investor and you continue to be on the ‘look out ‘for properties that he might be interested in.

 

Questions for the real estate professional:

 

At this point, would you consider that by the nature of your continued business dealings with the investor that a material business relationship between the two of you has been established?

 

At what point is a material relationship established?  After one transaction in which both the agent and the investor become business partners?  After five transactions in which the agent has ‘found good deals' for the investor to buy?  After the agent has both sold to the investor and then placed the property back on the market?  Never? 

 

At what point do you as the agent begin to disclose to a possible Seller that there is a material business relationship between you and the buyer?

 

Can you claim you are working as a ‘transaction' agent when you have been given instructions by the investor to ‘find good deals' and conversations you are having with Sellers are in an effort to ‘find a good deal' for the investor?

 

Please give me your opinions and make certain you let me know in what state you are licensed.

 

Thanks!

7:30am • #6

This blog does not allow anonymous comments

 
Ambassador_large

Ryan Shaughnessy, Broker/Attorney - Your Lafayette Square Real Estate Partner

Saint Louis, MO

More about me…

PREA Signature Realty - www.preasignaturerealty.com

Address: 1709 Park Avenue, Saint Louis, MO, 63104

Office Phone: (314) 397-3182

Cell Phone: (314) 971-4381

Email Me

A Blog for New Home & Other Sales Professionals and for Sellers and Buyers Interested in City Living PREA Signature Realty proudly serves the communities of Lafayette Square, Soulard, Benton Park, Benton Park West, Downtown Loft District, Forest Park Southwest, Central West End, Tower Grove East, Tower Grove South, Compton Heights, Shaw, The Hill, Dogtown, Carondelet, Holly Hills, St. Louis Hills, Dutchtown, and the Other Historic Neighborhoods of the City of Saint Louis, Missouri.

View Ryan Shaughnessy's profile on LinkedIn


twitstamp.com
Ryan Shaughnessy's Facebook profile



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog