H.R. 3221

is equivalent to an interest-free loan equal to 10 percent of the purchase of a home (up to $7,500)

by first-time home buyers. The provision applies to homes purchased on or after April 9, 2008

and before July 1, 2009. Taxpayers receiving this tax credit would be required to repay any

amount received under this provision back to the government over 15 years in equal installments.

The credit begins to phase out for taxpayers with adjusted gross income in excess of $75,000

($150,000 in the case of a joint return). This proposal is estimated to cost $4.853 billion over 10The bill would provide home owners

years.

Additional standard deduction for real property taxes.

who claim the standard deduction with an additional standard deduction for State and local real

property taxes. The maximum amount that may be claimed under this provision is $500 ($1,000

for joint filers). This proposal applies only for 2008. The bill would eliminate language included

in the Senate version of the bill that would have prevented taxpayers from claiming this

additional standard deduction if they reside in a locality that increased property tax rates in 2008.

This proposal is estimated to cost $1.537 billion over 10 years.

limit on the annual amount of Federal low-income housing tax credits that may be allocated

by each state. This limitation is currently set at $2.00 for each person residing in the state. States

with small populations are provided with a special set aside. The bill would increase this

limitation in 2008 and 2009 by an additional 20 cents for each person residing in the state and

increase the small state set-aside by 10 percent. This proposal is estimated to cost $1.084 billionThe bill contains numerous proposals to

over 10 years.

Low-income housing tax credit simplification.

simplify the technical rules relating to the LIHTC. In particular, the bill would: temporarily

establish a minimum credit rate for non-Federally subsidized buildings placed in service after

date of enactment and before December 31, 2013; clarify the circumstances under which a

building is considered to be Federally subsidized and the circumstances in which Federal

assistance will be taken into account in calculating the LIHTC; provide State housing agencies

with greater flexibility to select sites for low-income housing projects and allocate adequate

amounts of credit for projects; clarify the rules relating to determinations of current income;

provide developers with more time to begin construction of low-income housing projects after

the credits have been awarded (one year instead of current law 6 months); reform rules pertaining

to sales of low-income housing buildings; allow projects to establish housing units for

individuals who share common characteristics; relax income rules for rural areas; and eliminate

technical barriers to rehabilitating low-income housing projects. These proposals are estimatedThe bill contains two proposals to simplify the

to cost approximately $343 million over 10 years.

Tax-exempt housing bond simplification.

technical rules relating to tax-exempt housing bonds. In the construction and development of

low-income housing projects, states may find that it is most efficient to finance projects using a

series of short-term bonds. Under current law, there is a limitation on the annual amount of taxexempt

housing bonds that each state may issue. In the construction and development of lowincome

housing projects, states may find that it is most efficient to finance projects using a series

of short-term bonds. The bill would clarify that where a state issues a series of short-term bonds

for low-income housing projects that these bonds will only be counted once against this

limitation. The bill would also update the tax-exempt housing bond rules to conform certain

aspects of these rules to the low-income housing tax credit rules. These proposals are estimatedUnder current law, there is a national limit

to cost approximately $519 million over 10 years.

III. OTHER HOUSING PROVISIONS

Temporary increase in mortgage revenue bonds.

on the annual amount of tax-exempt housing bonds that each state may issue. Many states have

reached their limit. The bill would increase this national limit in 2008 to allow for the issuance

of an additional $11 billion of tax-exempt bonds to provide loans to first-time home buyers and

to finance the construction of low-income rental housing. The bill would also temporarily allow

qualified mortgage revenue bonds (a form of tax-exempt bond issued by states to help provide

financing to first-time home buyers) to be used to refinance certain subprime loans. ThisThe

proposal is estimated to cost $1.475 billion over 10 years.

Eliminate costs imposed on housing programs by the alternative minimum tax.

alternative minimum tax (AMT) can increase the cost of implementing housing programs. Under

current law, interest on tax-exempt housing bonds is subject to the AMT. This limits the

marketability of these bonds and limits the incentive effect of these bonds. Additionally, under

current law both low-income housing tax credits and rehabilitation tax credits cannot be taken

against the AMT. This limits the incentive effect of these credits. The bill would allow the lowincome

housing tax credit and the rehabilitation tax credit to be used to offset the AMT and

would ensure that interest on tax-exempt housing bonds is not subject to the AMT. TheseUnder current law, municipal bonds that are guaranteed by Federal home loan

proposals are estimated to cost $2.093 billion over 10 years.

Municipal bonds guaranteed by Federal home loan banks eligible for treatment as taxexempt

bonds.

banks cannot qualify as tax-exempt bonds unless the bonds are used to finance housing

programs. State and local governments currently face significant costs when issuing tax-exempt

municipal bonds to finance state and local projects. The bill would help these municipalities by

temporarily allowing bonds that are guaranteed by Federal home loan banks to be eligible for

treatment as tax-exempt bonds regardless of whether the bonds are used to finance housing

programs. Allowing these bonds to be guaranteed by Federal home loan banks will help State

and local governments obtain financing for necessary projects (e.g., constructing roads, repairing

bridges, building and renovating schools and hospitals, funding college loans, etc) at a lower

cost. This proposal is estimated to cost $126 million over 10 years.Under current

Protection of taxpayer Social Security numbers in real estate transactions.

law, an individual selling a home is required to provide the purchaser of the home with an

affidavit stating, under penalties of perjury, that the seller is not a nonresident alien individual or

a foreign corporation (special tax rules apply to sales of real estate by nonresident alien

individuals and foreign corporations). This affidavit must contain the seller's Social Security

number. In order to protect individuals from identity theft that could occur in connection with

the sale of real estate, the bill will allow the seller to provide this affidavit to the business

professional responsible for closing the real estate transaction (e.g., an attorney or title company)

instead of sending this affidavit to the purchaser. This proposal is estimated to cost $20 millionUnder current law,

over 10 years.

Encouraging the rehabilitation of government-leased buildings.

taxpayers are not eligible for the full amount of the rehabilitation credit if more than 35% of a

rehabilitated building is leased to a State or local government. In such a situation, expenditures

that are allocable to the portion of the building that is leased by the government will not be

counted in calculating the rehabilitation credit. In general, the bill would allow taxpayers to

qualify for the full amount of the rehabilitation credit so long as less than 50% of the

rehabilitated building is leased to State and local governments or other tax-exempt entities. ThisThe bill would also temporarily allow qualified mortgage

proposal is estimated to cost $262 million over 10 years.

Disaster mortgage revenue bonds.

revenue bonds (a form of tax-exempt bond issued by states to help provide financing to first-time

home buyers) to be used to help individuals purchase new homes in Presidentially-declared

disaster areas. This provision would apply to bonds issued after May 1, 2008 and prior to January

1, 2010. This proposal is estimated to cost $96 million over 10 years.The bill would include most of the provisions of H.R.

IV. REFORMS RELATED TO REITS

Real estate investment trust reforms.

1147, the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 (RIDEA). Real estate

investment trusts (REITs) are subject to complex rules that can limit the ability of these

businesses to adjust to changing market conditions and to manage risk. The bill would liberalize

these rules by clarifying that REITs can earn foreign currency income associated with real estate

activities, increasing the permissible size of REIT investments in taxable REIT subsidiaries,

modifying the REIT safe harbor for dealer sales, and extending the special rules for lodging

facilities to health care facilities. These proposals are estimated to cost $359 million over 10The bill would

years.

V. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF CERTAIN GO ZONE

INCENTIVES

Extension and expansion of certain Gulf Opportunity (GO) Zone incentives.

allow taxpayers in affected GO Zone areas to amend prior returns to take into account receipt of

hurricane-related recovery grants, waive the start-construction deadline for certain property

eligible for bonus deprecation in the GO Zone, and allow projects in two additional counties in

Alabama to qualify for tax-exempt bond financing. This provision is estimated to cost $1.333The bill would allow

billion over ten years.

VI. TAX PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE ECONOMIC STIMULUS

ACT OF 2008

Election to accelerate recognition of historic AMT/R&D credits.

taxpayers to elect to accelerate the recognition of a portion of their historic AMT or research and

development (R&D) credits in lieu of the bonus depreciation tax benefit that was included in the

Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. The amount that taxpayers receive is calculated based on the

amount that each taxpayer invests in property that would otherwise qualify for bonus

depreciation under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. This amount is capped at the lesser of 6

percent of historic AMT and R&D credits or $30 million. This provision is estimated to costThe

$996 million over ten years.

Transfer of funds appropriated to carry out 2008 recovery rebates for individuals.

Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 appropriated money into several Department of the Treasury

accounts in order to carry out the recovery rebate program. The bill would provide the Secretary

of the Treasury with flexibility to transfer funds among these accounts to carry out the purposes

of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. This provision has no revenue effect.The bill would enact a

VII. REVENUE PROVISIONS

Information returns for merchant payment card reimbursements.

proposal contained in the President's FY 2009 Budget to require institutions that make payments

to merchants in settlement of payment card transactions to file an information return with the

Internal Revenue Service. According to the Treasury Department, "Payment cards (both credit

cards and debit cards) are an increasingly common form of payment to merchants for property

and services rendered. Some merchants fail to report accurately their gross income, including

income derived from payment card transactions. Generally, compliance increases significantly

for amounts that a third party reports to the IRS." The bill would also require information returns

for payments in settlement of certain third party network transactions that operate in a manner

similar to payment card transactions. This proposal was previously approved by the House of

Representatives as part of H.R. 6275 by a vote of 233 to 189 (with 10 House Republicans joining

223 House Democrats in support). This proposal is estimated to raise $9.529 billion over 10In 2004, Congress provided

years.

Delay implementation of worldwide allocation of interest.

taxpayers with an election to take advantage of a liberalized rule for allocating interest expense

between United States sources and foreign sources for purposes of determining a taxpayer's

foreign tax credit limitation. Although enacted in 2004, this election is not available to taxpayers

until taxable years beginning after 2008. The bill would delay the phase-in of this new

liberalized rule for two years (for taxable years beginning after 2010). Special transition rules

would apply in the first year that the liberalized rule phases in. The House of Representatives has

voted on a bipartisan basis to delay the implementation of this future tax benefit in order to

provide current tax relief numerous times: as part of H.R. 3920 by a vote of 264 to 157 (with 38

House Republicans joining 226 House Democrats in support); as part of H.R. 3221 by a vote of

322 to 94 (with 95 House Republicans joining 227 House Democrats in support); and as part of

H.R. 6049 by a vote of 263-160 (with 35 House Republicans joining 228 House Democrats in

support). A portion of the revenue raised from this provision will also cover some of the cost of

supplemental funding for the Community Development Block Grant program. This proposal isThe bill amends the

estimated to raise $7.627 billion over 10 years.

Modification of exclusion of gain on sale of a principal residence.

current law exclusion of up to $250,000 ($500,000 if married filing a joint return) of gain

realized on the sale or exchange of a principal residence. Under current law, the sale of a home

will qualify for this exclusion if the home is a taxpayer's principal residence for at least two of

the five years ending on the sale or exchange. This exclusion applies even if the home was

initially purchased as a second home. Under the bill, if a taxpayer moves their principal

residence to a second home, the taxpayer will only be able to utilize this exclusion to the extent

that it relates to the period of time when the home was first used as a principal residence and to

the extent that it relates to the period of time that the home was owned prior to January 1, 2009.

This proposal was previously approved by the House of Representatives as part of H.R. 3648 by

a vote of 387 to 27 (with 165 House Republicans joining with 221 House Democrats in support).

This proposal is estimated to raise $1.394 billion over 10 years.