The “license hanging wall” brokerage business is re-surging in today’s less than optimal economy. I am sure there are one or more such brokerages operating in your market. For a monthly fee of $25 or $50, those nice people that obtained their real estate license in the recent boom housing market get to keep their license active while they do whatever they have to do to survive the downturn, and maybe sell a house once in a while. The brokerage takes the monthly fee, and since there is almost zero overhead in maintaining the license, the money goes directly to the bottom line. The sharp operator can hang almost limitless numbers of licenses, and if one of the licensees actually sells something, there are additional processing fees to cover the cost of that specific overhead. It is, very simply, a money machine.

My concern here is not aimed at a brokerage’s license hanging business model, or the nice people that hang them on the wall, but it is aimed at an industry philosophy that caters to the mediocre and tolerates the incompetent. Now, before someone gets their nose out of joint, or puts their toes out there where I am liable to step on them, please understand where I am coming from. I have believed for the 30 years I have been practicing real estate brokerage that you deserved to be paid only if you gave value. It is no wonder that consumers are having difficulty paying the “professional” service fee, because consumers are questioning the value proposition offered by the brokerage industry. There is nothing professional about hanging a license on a wall waiting for easy times. (Please take a moment, leap to your Webster’s and determine the difference between “acting in a professional manner” and being a “professional”.)

It wasn’t too long ago that the National Association of Realtors was proudly crowing that NAR was the world’s largest trade association at 1.3 million members. I cannot for the life of me understand why an organization would boast about being really big unless there was a benefit to its members, but, never-the-less, there we were at 1.3 million; averaging all of 6 closings per year (that number not being mentioned in the press releases). Lately, that 1.3 million has dropped a bit, perhaps something about a difficult economy. A quick look at post WW II demographics would indicate that today's Realtor membership should be something like 850,000 if a consistent relationship between the United States population and Realtor membership were maintained. The economic rule here is – more of anything lessens the worth of the thing!

So I say-Now is our chance!

If there was ever a time to raise the bar of both licensing and NAR membership, it is now, before the economy recovers and hundreds of thousands of opportunists rush to grab a real estate license. The NAR should lobby for every state to increase the difficulty and cost of obtaining a license, while, at the same time, raise the standards of membership and make ethics complaints easier to file, and penalties for violation truly painful. This is an ideal time to improve the quality and competency of the NAR’s membership, while at the same time demonstrating to the consuming public that we are worth what we charge. I firmly believe that residential real estate brokerage will be around for some time to come; however, the practitioners are going to have to be demonstrably good at what they do.

Larry D. McGee
Broker
The Berkshire Group, Realtors
3801 E. Florida Avenue
Suite 400
Denver, Colorado, 80210
US
Work: 303-513-1436
Fax: 303-953-5390
larry@tbgdenver.com
Visit Search for Denver Homes Here!
 

7 Comments on Becoming Truly Professional

DEC
28
178,248 Points 13 Featured Posts

Larry,

Really well thought out post.

I especially think this is an interesting way of looking at us, "The economic rule here is - more of anything lessens the worth of the thing!"

I guess I have never thought about the REALTOR community in this respect, but this is a very valid point.

1:53pm • #1
841,544 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

I agree completely.  The goal of membership numbers is not a lofty goal. 

2:05pm • #2
1 Featured Post

Lenn and Mark,

Thank you for reading and commenting. I believe that part of our "Road to Recovery" - (Inman) should be to raise the professionalism of our industry.

3:02pm • #3
1 Featured Post

Larry,

I agree with your post. Here in Washington State, the government actually came up with stricter guidelines that will be implemented by 2010, such as fingerprint and background checks requirements for new licensees, increased education requirements for new agents from 60 hours to 90 hours and quite a few more. Unfortunately it will take more than a year to go into effect and the changes didn't come from our Realtor organisation.

Sandy 

 

3:04pm • #4
1 Featured Post

Thank you Sandy.

Here in Colorado we have required fingerprinting with FBI background checks since the early 90's.  160 hours of classwork to obtain a license.  Every state is different, with some at the laughable level. Our trade association needs to get in front of this, before the regulators start mandating.  We want to improve, and not apply higher levels of regulatory mediocrity.

3:28pm • #5
DEC
29
343,691 Points Outside Blog

Hi Larry

The real estate industry needs to raise the standards for the professional it's not about the number of members.

Good luck and success

Lou Ludwig

11:13am • #6
1 Featured Post

Lou, thanks for your continued readership.

5:04pm • #7

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Larry McGee

Denver, CO

More about me…

The Berkshire Group, Realtors

Office Phone: (303) 350-5838

Cell Phone: (303) 513-1436

Email Me

brokerisms.theberkshiregroup.com A running commentary on all things about real estate brokerage; and anything I find interesting at the moment.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find CO real estate agents and Denver real estate on ActiveRain.