|
Find MD real estate agents and Columbia real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
3 Comments on GROSS LEASABLE VERSUS NET RENTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE!!!
Hi Evan,
Hope you are doing well. I just wanted to know, Is tenant requires to pay rent on the basis of Gross Leasable Area or Net Leasable Area?, If on the basis of GLA then why they agree to it?
Looking forward for your reply
Thanks, Ankit
In most cases you will pay based on Gross Leasable Area because you are responsible for a portion of the common area.
Ankit:
In the vast majority of cases, the tenant will have to pay based upon the GLA of the building. It's not so much a matter of whether you want to pay for your share of the common area. Rather, that's how pricing models have developed over the years, and they've been that way for decades. If you want to lease a space, the pricing is based on the GLA, and you simply aren't going to be able to lease a space from the landlord.
Landlords also have models in which they calculate their return on investment on a given property. As investors, they require that minimum return to elect to invest in a commercial real estate asset. If they gave the tenants rents based upon the net rentable area, then they would simply adjust the per square foot rents upward so that they could meet their target ROI's.