I read with interest an article that suggested that the victim of a short sale would only have that credit impact for nine months.
As opposed to the 7-10 year credit commitment of a foreclosure.
Because that seems pretty short term in ramification (realistically) for a short sale (even with timely payments up until the closing), my digging (which was admittedly contrary in findings, one to the next - NY specific) begged the question: what IS reasonable for a seller to edure from a credit standpoint if the result of their actions unloaded the bank debt, a bit short?
Because the bank made the same error that the home buyer did, a realistic short sale offer would seem the fairest alternative to both. The spending of the bank "bailout" makes me want to suggest that the equitable thing to do would be for the bank to pay the seller for their "pain and suffering", but that ain't happening.
We have NY friends that foreclosed a year ago, and it's not on their credit report yet.
How far down SHOULD a short sale credit score drop, keeping in mind that there are a contingent of people who are managing to maintain their credit despite the economic disaster?
For the moment?
While there will be many transactions absent this element, the numbers are increasing-understanding the process itself is fine up until the point at which I wonder, "how far does a short sale drop a sellers credit score, were the short the only negative factor?"
Which leads to "how much SHOULD it?"
Laurie, I could not advise on the time frame for credit being affected. However, I would be interested in reading that article. Could you provide a link to that please?