Google searches and Google's fastest response times to your search requests are now the subject of making you feel guilty for using search queries.   Google carbon footprint

This was just too good ridiculous to pass up!

SIDEBAR: I just posted some great Active Rain and SEO tutorials so just skip this post is you don't like my political views and satire. I am NOT politically correct and don't ever plan to be. You can come back tomorrow to find some more posts to help you in your business and blogging. But this is my rant for the week.

I just read this post over on Redstates contributor Jeff Emanuel - This is just TOOO Much!!!!

You can read the source article from TimesOnline to verify  that I am NOT making this up! In fact, it is just too far fetched for me to make this up!

A Harvard Physicist by the name of Alex Wissner- Gross said that by any of us performing just 2 Google searches is equivalent to boiling water for a cup of tea. He further states that Google is not considering their carbon footprint by bringing back the search results in the fastest amount of time which of course if one of Google's great claims to fame and we all know this because we love how fast Google is.

SO now Google is bad according to environmentalists because Google prides themselves in speed of delivery.

What about all the time that we save by having the searches come back fast? If I work faster I am more efficient. Or are we going to be forced back to candlelight, horse and buggies and dial up slow motion searches because we are too stupid to save ourselves.

Now, let me tell you this is yet another future infringement on our rights and freedoms. Can you just imagine having big brother count how many google searches you do and then charge you for it. No, better yet, you can buy some carbon offsets in Al Gore's company. Remember that there is actually legislation on the table in California where Big Brother wants to set your thermostat for you! You won't be able to choose the temperature unless of course it is higher not lower.

Or maybe Karma is good and the attorneys will get together and file a class action law suit against Al Gore because he invented the internet so it is all his fault because he started this whole thing!

Or maybe like Jeff says in his post, we need to all give our tithes to Algore with blank checks so he can just fill in what he thinks your carbon footprint should be penalized with. 

Jeff says: "Make sure the next time you run a Google search (or a hundred of them), you face the East, beg forgiveness from Gaia, and offer Algore a tithe of at least half your salary to offset the damage you’re doing to this planet."

Or maybe this is the setup to start charging us all big bucks to use the internet. Then poor people would not be able to use the internet.

Nothing like the guilt trip perpetuating to the point of why don't we just pull our own plugs and be done with it!

Oh and check out in the article about how they also want to control what you get to say on Twitter! Hmmm, who is going to decide for you whether your Tweet is worthy of carbons or not!??! Who will be the judge and at what point is it no longer a constitutional right of free speech? While I don't use Twitter to talk about what I eat for dinner I have no business to tell another person that they can not do that!

"Such internet phenomena are not simply fun and hot air, Newcombe warns: the boom in such services has a carbon cost."

I wonder what happens to people who can not afford to pay for their horrid damage they are making on this planet? It is a scary thought of what could become of them. I saw this scary carbon footprint game that was made for kids in schools and the kids were made to feel as if they were beneath contempt if they breathe too many breaths. Like each breathe they take causes damage to the planet.

Let me set the record straight. I think it is great that we all conserve energy and don't throw our garbage out in the streets. I believe in being respectful to our earth and love and take care of it. But I also know that God who knows everything is smart enough to have safeguards put in place to keep his earth that he created from being totally destroyed.

I know that the global warming has 2 sides to it. I do not believe that it is the end all. I don 't believe that we have to live like cave men in order to protect our planet. I also believe in conspiracies and this is one that outdoes them all! This is a total set up for a one world government and world courts. Just follow the money! That is all you ever have to do. Global warming and climate change, whatever you want to call is all  about the money and the power.

Individual freedoms and liberty are at peril. 

You have my permission to reblog and pass along.

I will stop my rant by quoting a great comment by Kenneth L. Solomon on Jeff's blog that reads:

He also suggests to go over to the Timesonline article and write a piffy comment!

"I’m going to set my computer on an automatic random Google search and let it fly while I go out and boil up some water to fill my swimming pool with hot tea.”

 

 
Post is included in group: Silent Majority
Post is included in group: Politics And Real Estate
Post is included in group: Front Porch Majority
Post is included in group: Almost Anything Goes
Post is included in group: Active Rain Question Of The Week

46 Comments on Oh No! Google and All Of Us Accused Of Causing Carbon Damage With Our Searches

JAN
12
202,366 Points 19 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Okay - I have a good friend who is concerned about the environment.  Who isn't?  But, their family carries it to an extreme.  I found it amusing because they were the first to go to bottle watered only to learn that it added to the carbon footprint.  I have passed this along to him because it is frankly funny and alarming at the same time.  I enjoyed the satire. Just curious, what grant paid for the study?

1:06pm • #1
1 Featured Post

As I sit here in DC freezing my backside off, I remember that this is global warming at its best - It's that damn George Bush at work. (In case you wonder - yes I am a Republican and I am not politically correct in my heart either.)  After January 20, who will we have to blame? Great - it will be Google that I can blame!

1:10pm • #2

Interesting info to consider.  On the other hand, compare how much water we could boil with the energy used when we drive to the local grocery store.

One of the best ways to reduce our carbon footprint is to avoid having lots of children.  If the Earth's population were 1 billion instead of 6 billion+ I don't think we would be in this mess.

1:11pm • #3
1 Featured Post Outside Blog

Very interesting and I have never heard this before.  Perhaps this is brought up to get the attention off of the big time polluters.

1:16pm • #4
424,805 Points 36 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Katerina,

When they say, "A litle learning is a dangerous thing"...they ain't a kiddin'...!!! Thanks,   Fran

P.S. I wonder what the carbon footprint of a hug is???

1:20pm • #5
204,329 Points 19 Featured Posts Outside Blog

O'my!

I Goggle enough to heat a hot tub for 8 and the adjoining 40 foot swimming pool! Daily!

Have you seen that the Russians are predicting a new ice age? They are offering more facts than the global warming people.

O'well, I think I'll take my SUV for a joy ride.

Bill

1:24pm • #6
313,223 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

It is one thing to be concerned about the environment, it is entirely something else to lose all common sense in doing so.  This is why I think that Universities should consider hiring only professors that have actually worked at a career beyond school prior to hiring them.  Those that have only worked menial, (if any jobs at all) to put themselves through the years upon years of schooling to be a professor are usually very smart, but have no sense at all!

1:32pm • #7

What do you mean Al Gore didn't invent the Internet ?????? Funny how some people will believe anything that is on the Internet....great rant... I totallyagree with Tony or Darcy Cannon if you haven't worked that career don't teach it, you only know what you have been told.....If you don't know about wood...don't teach wood shop.....I look forward for more rants and info peace zane

1:49pm • #8
339,563 Points 4 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Katrina - it is just another step in the goal of mediocrity, punish excellence, reward the average. The 100 watt incandescent bulb has been banned in the EU and they are now considering controlling the size of flat screen TV's in order to prevent global warming. And remember, Obama does want to regulate thermostats to conform with what the rest of the world deems fair!

BTW - I did my first internet development support (it was arpanet then) in 1978. I never did see Al anywhere.

2:51pm • #9
838,418 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

I just heard that gentleman interviewed on CNBC.

All I can figure is that he's a subversive from Yahoo!

3:00pm • #10
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Hawaii Homes- Well, I am defensive on that issue since I have 8 children and gave birth to 6 of them. I don't believe for a minute that overpopulation is a problem because of my deep Christian values, believing that God said to multiply and replenish. Most all the people in my church have big families, there is nothing more wonderful than having a large dinner table populated with all my grown now children engaging in great family conversation, sharing love and hugs, a very spiritual experience. Katerina

3:10pm • #11
242,247 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Katerina,

This is just another example of how ridiculous much of the global warming causes can be.

3:12pm • #13
Outside Blog

That is pretty funny post... at least for me... based on what Algore wants, why even exist on earth? Because if an average person lives up to 70 years old, can you imagine how much crap that one person can create in his or her life span?  Whew... now that I know I can still burn up some carbon, let me go boil some tea that I don't plan to drink...

4:00pm • #15
305,741 Points 3 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

That's funny I was just reading about this from Twitter!  I guess there is a price to pay for everything.

4:13pm • #16
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Georgina- You are doing much more than your part! You are OFF the grid, have that COOL electric motorcycle and live where the sun shines every day, solar heat! You get to TWEET all you want! Love your tweets BTW! I get first crack at seeing your beautiful photos of Paradise!

OH, and you do it all by your own FREE will! No one made you do it! Love that!

4:54pm • #17

The smartest thing I read on your post is"follow the money".

Asking this often rips open the hypocracy of "thought leaders on and off line"

Not to worry about global warming though, Pravda just recently announced we are heading towards an ice age. I wish these doomsdayers would get their doom straight.

6:14pm • #18
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Tim- Pravda is yet another Follow the Money strategy. When will their stories ever get straight? Thanks for the comment.

8:46pm • #19
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Eileen- That is what I am saying! Why should we breathe since each breath hurts the earth, yet the earth was made for us. It is such a scam! Now go burn some of your carbons and have a party!

8:48pm • #20
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Ryan- You bring up a good question. I did not read who paid for this reseach, maybe like Lenn said, was it Yahoo? No, I think it is someone that wants more control over us who can not make decisions for ourselves. :) Yeah, now I switched to reverse osmosis for our whole house a few years ago and fill up our water bottles now and take them with us not because of the carbon but because it is the healthiest water for our bodies. But now I hear in towns in California they are going to start outlawing salt water systems. Reverse osmosis uses salt and our pool is a salt water pool, for our health again. SO they want to control what I do for my health now?

8:51pm • #21
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Lise- LOL, we will have to trade notes:) I like your spirit! I have an awesome tear jerker encounter with Bush to share with you. A very dear friend of mine was just with him the other day.

8:53pm • #22
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Christine- could be or it could be a bigger mess, access to knowledge is power and power has been given to the people, and there are people who do not like that. It is about money and control.

8:55pm • #23
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Fran- I am afraid that your statement is more about those in control who fear the masses having access to this much knowledge. It may not be about carbons at all. If they can charge for each search , tax it somehow, then the poor would no longer have access, mediocrity will remain and they can stay on top. Right now anyone no matter where they come from, they can be homeless, go to a library, get online and start an online business and become successfull.

8:58pm • #24
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

William- Make sure you buy your carbon offsets from Al Gore's offset company, might as well keep it all in his family:) SO you don't feel guilty about driving your SUV!

9:00pm • #25
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Tony and Darcy- Right on! My mother was a genius. She got her PHD from Stanford and spent most of her life in universities and mostly at Stanford. She did not know how to take care of us kids. She was so smart but no common sense. And her thinking was not in reality. I know first hand about that.

9:02pm • #26
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Zane- I only do these kinds of rants about once a month. Mostly about taxation, parental rights and homeschool rights. I don't wish to chase away all my readers:) Most of them just skip this stuff. Thanks for stopping by and reading my rant.

9:04pm • #27
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Mike Saunders- Ditto! Thanks for your conversation. It is right to the point and true.

9:06pm • #28
JAN
13
2 Featured Posts

So silly.  I wonder how much carbon damage was done to complete the study.

Michelle

12:07am • #31

Two things the researcher failed to consider:

1) Google will run their servers whether you do a search or not.  Therefore, your searches don't increase the carbon footprint of Google.  Turning your computer on does.

2) If someone decides to try to "save the earth" by no longer searching online, the alternative - driving to the library - will create a FAR greater carbon footprint.

I saw a fantastic analogy for AGW.  Like a mouse climbing up the leg of an elephant with rape on its mind is humankind's impact on global warming.

12:09am • #32
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Michelle- LOL! That is a good one! But you see, their study's use is justified:) they always justify!

12:11am • #33
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

David- That is a good one, the mouse analogy!

Hmm, did you read his study? Why did he say that each 2 searches = water boiling for one cup of tea? They even complain about Google running its servers. Most of all they have gathered has been a result of the speed of information at their fingertips. So hypocritical.

You are right, driving to the library uses more energy.

I not only have to watch everything I say since the first amendment right does not pertain to me and now I must watch each breathe I take, how long I take it, and where my feet travel because of my carbon footprint? Give me a break.

12:16am • #34

Katerina - I think he calculated out how much energy he thinks Google uses to power all their servers for however many microseconds and added that to the amount of energy he estimates the typical computer (that the typical person searching owns) uses to do the search, then guessed at what sort of power plant supplied that electricity, and finally, calculated how much CO2 that power plant would emit in producing the electricity to power all those computers for those microseconds.

Needless to say, he spent far more energy and time, and released far more CO2 thinking and calculating all those figures, than any of the searches ever did.  And his carbon footprint for his efforts was truly newly-generated, not something that was already being used.  In other words, his work had a more significant negative impact in terms of new CO2 creation than Google, since Google has been doing what it does long before he dreamed up this research project.

BTW, someone else (I think in the comments on the original article) commented that he also failed to take into consideration that Google has gone to the effort of utilizing "green" energy sources.  I believe they mentioned something about a hydrogen powered plant - that would not release CO2, but rather H2O as its byproduct.  What's really funny about that is, although it would be considered less-polluting to release water instead of carbon-dioxide, in actuality, water wins the award as the undisputed champion in terms of greatest impact of all greenhouse gases!  (So much so that they don't bother to even calculate its Global Warming Potential.)  (To read more about water's impact, see this link.  Particularly from Table 3 and beyond.)

1:48am • #35
308,791 Points Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

I do alot of carbon footprints I guess. I like to give hugs, and do searches, and think alot. Perhaps, we all should just disappear and save the earth.

9:02am • #36
3 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

Who would have thought, huh? I don't drive a car that much living her in NYC that I think I am doing my little part to keep my carbon footprint as small as possible. 

12:38pm • #37
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

David- OK Were you a scientist in your previous career or life? WOW! That was awesome information and you put it in a way that I could understand! Thanks so much for all that info. I am in agreement that he created many more new 'carbons' by his research than we do when searching. I am not going to live my life in worry and stress over how much damage I am causing simply by breathing, walking, driving and google searching!

1:35pm • #38
JAN
15
211,939 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

there is no perfect way, however, this seems to be the most efficient way, the required 'carbon footprint' to act in todays society in any other way would be exponentially greater

9:51am • #39
JAN
16

Lol - Funny post. The thing I think is funny is when people claim that we've been on the earth for millions of years & over several decades we've completely destroyed the planet & are on track for extinction!

8:50am • #40
308,791 Points Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Thats too funny. Good point. Carbon footprints made up by the ones who make the greatest footprints. Brilliant.

9:33am • #41
251,398 Points 2 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Katerina - This morning it was 6 degrees at my home in Nashville, so much for global warming. I believe it was just a way for Al Gore to make 100 million dollars on a slide show.

8:29pm • #42
JAN
17
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Dan- LOL, Well, I know in my heart of hearts that man has NOT been on this planet for millions of years. People can make fun of me all they want for believing in intelligent design and creationism but they can not claim I am ignorant or stupid. :) I can hold my own with PHDs etc, as my family is filled with the brain genes. I just happen to be the one in my family who is the 'Christian'.  I have some great studies of how this planet is solid, strong and is made to withstand even our carbon footprints. Such a bunch of hogwash! 

1:07am • #43
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Nicholas- Wait for my post on Monday about how all the greenies are going to making more pollution in one day next week than you will if you lived even 57,000 years!

1:08am • #44
650,269 Points 104 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Larry- YEAH! We capitalists are just jealous that we did not dream this up before Gore did! SHUCKS! I missed the boat! The making money part is not what I am ever upset over, it is the lies and deceit, greed and control, that I fight against. The poor people suffer the most over these rules and laws yet these same folks supposedly care about the poor. YEAH, right!

It is 48 degrees here in FLORIDA!!!!!!!!!!

Of course, my brother argued with me that suddenly the cold weather is also a part of global warming. Hmmmm, how does that work! No matter what happens they will spin it to their benefit and control and then create laws and rules to keep the people down. They all suffer from guilty consciences from living the good life so the goal is to make us a second class country so they can feel equal to the rest of the world, mediocrity abounds.

1:13am • #45
JAN
22

Katerina - sorry for taking so long to get back to you (see your comment from 1/13)

No, I haven't been a scientist.  Unless you consider taking science courses in High School and University to have made me a scientist.  LOL!

I do come from a family that includes several with science and engineering backgrounds.  And I was raised to try to think logically/scientifically.  So I naturally gravitate toward reasonable explanations.  And I tend to be somewhat skeptical when things just don't add up.  Yet I'm often (usually?) willing to seriously consider alternative explanations.

Speaking of that, on the 17th you responded to Dan saying, "I know in my heart of hearts that man has NOT been on this planet for millions of years."

One alternative explanation for the apparent old-earth that's largely obtained from Carbon-dating vs the young-earth that's evident from historic writings comes from a couple of scientists out of Australia.  I first heard about their research from a friend who was a Senior Research Physicist at SRI.  My brief description of their findings is: The speed of light (c), proclaimed to be one of the invariable constants of the universe, appears to have been slowing down.  If the conclusions arrived at based on the statistical research (using historic measurements of c) are correct, then there are some HUGE consequences.  Among those consequences is that the earth isn't anywhere near as old as has been taught in science classes.  (With c decreasing, the rate of carbon-decay has been decreasing as well.)

To give you an analogy...

You're in FL.  A friend comes to visit.  You know the friend started out from Alaska.  All you can see of their journey is the last few miles - over which they've been steadily moving along at half-a-mile-per-hour. 

Now, you decide you want to figure out how long their journey has taken. 

If you assume, based on your observation, that they have been steadily traveling at 1/2mph for the entire journey, and that the whole journey was exactly 5,000 miles (actually a rough estimate from WikiAnswers) you'll conclude that they've been working on getting to you for 10,000 hours, or about 14 months.

But if you look closely, you notice they're really not moving steadily at 1/2mph.  You realize they're actually coasting along, very, very efficiently, but ever so slightly slowing down.

Now you've got a different equation to figure out, because it's now reasonable to assume they started out moving faster, possibly MUCH faster than what you've observed.  What if... they started out moving as fast the the Space Shuttle on reentry?  (That would be about 17,500mph.)  And what if they've been slowing down since just after they left?  Now how long would you conclude they'd been working on getting to you?  (At a steady speed of 17,500mph, they'd make the trip in just over 17 minutes!)

BIG difference!  And even with them slowing down the whole time... even if they slowed down very quickly at first (due to the friction of the atmosphere)... they most likely would have only been "on the road" (really, well above the road initially!  LOL) for hours or days at the most, not months.

Similarly, if c has been slowing down - possibly quite rapidly at first - then all our assumptions about how long it's taken to get to this point are off.  In fact they could be WAY off.

Most people don't deal well with change.  And a significant change in perspective, such as this presents, is going to naturally be resisted, even by supposedly "open minded" scientists.  And, as they should, if forced to seriously consider it, they will seek to find any flaws in the reasoning and/or data.

2:37pm • #46

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Ambassador_large

Nestor & Katerina Gasset Realtors® Wellington Florida Luxury Homes

Wellington, FL

More about me…

International Properties and Investments, Inc.

Address: 1021 Cherry Lane, Wellington, Fl, 33414

Office Phone: (561) 753-0135

Cell Phone: (561) 502-1577

Email Me

Wellington Florida Real Estate Blog By Katerina Gasset of International Properties & Investments, Inc. is a Great Place For Real Estate Agents and Potential Buyers and Sellers to get to know more about Wellington Florida as well as other parts of Palm Beach County.

Subscribe to my blog by email

Join Active Rain




Powered by RealBird

Locations of visitors to this page iCLIPART.com <!--- YPQNXNLRRSEP --->



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find FL real estate agents and Wellington real estate on ActiveRain.