I think I'm in the extreme minority about the concept of consistently following or friending strangers in the social networks. It seems most people don't like the idea of embracing strangers until relationships are established. I've always thought it better to accept the invitation of a stranger to connect and then figure out what the connection is instead of blanket rejecting the relationship request (unless of course the request is unsavory).

I've found out it's pretty controversial to state I'll simply follow/friend a stranger if they follow me. Critics are saying only spammers and self promoters (I have one comment invoking the word "Realtor") do this. They say a large following makes it impossible for conversation. In theory, it's true. But frankly, I'm developing more quality relationships from Twitter and Facebook despite having a large following because new opportunities come in from my new networks daily. And of course, many of the ideas and relationships are coming from strangers, who then become acquaintances.

For real estate professionals building a community network, it seems natural to follow strangers who may be interested in watching or getting more information about you. After all, you never know whether there is a professional relationship in the future.

I discuss this at Media Transparent. Any thoughts about this?

 

5 Comments on Managing all those Social Networks while Retaining Community

JAN
26
1 Featured Post

Pat 'Befriending" strangers may be fine IF you actually do it. If you have 9700 followers its impossible to "befriend" nearly any meaningful percentage of them!

If 9700 people want to legitimately follow you because you are an industry thought leader are your really being polite by following them back, when probably most of your followers read your tweets, but you probably rarely have time to ready the tweets of your followers.

@lcammarosa

6:57am • #1
1 Featured Post

Pat

How about Not enough Twitter?

@lcammarosa

7:23am • #2
17 Featured Posts

It's true I don't follow the strangers who have befriended me, but i do follow a more intimate group on Tweetdeck so I easily follow the conversations of those I want to see. What I like about having a large following are the "out of the blue" interactions and opportunities that are happening when one of my followers comes out of the woodwork and introduce themselves. That wouldn't happen if my follower base were limited to 50-100.

Again, I don't see why having a large following is controversial when I can continue to keep track of the more intimate group. I would expect real estate agents would want to develop a large local following in any social network so they can become more intimate within their community.

10:05am • #3
1 Featured Post

HI Pat

I don't think having a large following is controversial. My concern was how do you manage all the followers. Tweet deck seems to be the answer. Tweet deck seems to allow you to pay close attention to those you wish and to allow the other 9600 to wash by you if you so chose to listen to their tweets

10:10am • #4
MAR
12

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Patrick Kitano

San Francisco, CA

More about me…

Domus Consulting Group

Office Phone: (415) 320-2844

Cell Phone: (415) 320-2844

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find CA real estate agents and San Francisco real estate on ActiveRain.