Late yesterday - the House passed the $819 billion stimulus plan, which included a modified first time homebuyer tax credit. The Senate may vote on its version of the bill sometime next week.

The bill is changing the terms of the $7,500 tax credit that was issued as a part of the Housing Recovery Act, which Congress passed last summer.

Previous legislation required that the tax credit be repaid over 15 years, making it more of a no-interest loan. Not surprisingly, the measure had little impact on the market. The stimulus bill now under consideration would make that tax credit a true credit that doesn't need to be repaid.

NAR estimates that there could be a 10% increase in home sales if it's implemented - giving people who are sitting on the fence or who have inadequate funds for closing costs an incentive to act now.  NAR thinks that a 10% increase would yield an extra half million sales this year.

To be eligible, buyers cannot have owned a home for the past three years, and the new home has to be used as a primary residence. The credit phases out as income rises above $75,000 for singles and $150,000 for couples, and disappears entirely at $95,000 and $170,000, respectively.

Applying for it is easy, or at least as easy as doing your income taxes. Just claim it on your return. That's it. No other forms or papers have to be filed.

Both the Senate and the House versions of the new act remove the requirement that buyers repay the credit. The Senate bill applies retroactively to any purchase completed between January 1, 2009 and the end of August. The House version is also retroactive to the start of the year, and expires at the end of June. As long as buyers don't sell for at least 36 months, they keep the money.

And the credit is refundable, meaning that it can be claimed even if the amount of the credit earned exceeds the buyer's tax liability. So even if your total tax bill comes to just $5,000, you can still qualify for a full $7,500 refund.

THe theory is that First time buyers who purchase from existing homeowners free those sellers to trade up to bigger, better houses.   But many exsiting homeowners are not trading up anymore.

Buyers should be aware that they won't actually receive any refund for a home purchased this year until after they file their 2009 income taxes in April 2010.

Some argue that the credit is poorly targeted because it goes to every first-time buyer, not just the ones who wouldn't buy without it. So, it merely provides a windfall for many people who would have purchased anyway.  I believe that interest rates are still too high to stimulate things as much as they need to be stimulated.   6 months ago - there was talk that the government was going to figure out a way to get rates to drop in the 4.5% range or less.  That hasn't happened.  Rates are still in the 5's.  

I believe that patchwork stimuluses in this multi-billion dollar package isn't the answer - though this well help.  Getting rates to drop is the answer - and answer that we've all been waiting for for a long time now.

The $7,500 tax credit, regardless of the details, does nothing to address the issue that's holding some buyers back - the suspicion that prices are going to keep falling. That said - when we negotiate on a home for our buyer clients - we build in a large buffer factor for to cover that very issue.  I'm having one of my busiest January's in a long time...Though I kinow that other agents are suffering.  My clients aren't holding back at any rate.... I've written up a couple of purchase contracts this week - and we are in negotiations for some serious price-off...

I suggest that the government may want to think about making it available to all homebuyers, not just first-timers. And  have the credit last through the end of the year, at least.  But the biggest thing that could be done is to drop rates.  As we all know - rates are inversely related to prices.

 

39 Comments on First Time Homebuyer Credit May Become a True Credit and Not a Payback Deal

JAN
29
224,673 Points

Great information and timely too!  I have been pushing this credit information on many on the fence buyers....

8:51am • #1
157,898 Points

It could make a difference for many people buying a house.  We'll see.

9:09am • #2
149,521 Points 1 Featured Post

Perhaps the $7500 should go for resodding the Washington Mall grass....which is also in this and Sooooo important to the recovery. I would like to see the Down Payment Assistance programs come back..that might motivate people who wouldn't otherwise buy. And interest rates. That is what was the "great" motivator about the sub-prime. The payments were so low that people could afford them, if we could get them lower and sustain them....then there might be a recovery.

9:17am • #3
819,633 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

You are right Rick.  Existing home owners are not moving up.  They cannot.  They can't sell what they have because of - - -  you guessed it, negative equity.

This is a very timely post.  If the "stimulus bill" goes through, let's hope this one crumb for the consumer will survive.

 

10:11am • #4
113,915 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

I really like the credit, rather than having it as a payback. I definitely think buyers will see it as much more of an incentive, and not so confusing. Thankyou!

10:22am • #5
Localism Sponsor

Anything that the government can do regardless of how little will at least stimulate the market in the right direction. Unfortunately, despite the size of the stimulus plan, it's not going to fix our housing mess.

 


 Click Here

10:25am • #6
150,416 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Rick,

Well at this point I am sure we will all take whatever help comes down the pipeline.

10:29am • #7

Hello,

I saw the comment about the downpayment assistance programs and just had to post this information.

There is a bill out H.R. 600 that reforms and revives the downpayment assistance programs. That were eliminated on October 1.

The elimination of DPA programs is catastrophic at a time when qualified homebuyers are needed to purchase homes.  

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that seller-financed DPA will generate $65 million over the next five years and save taxpayers $13 million next year.

Downpayment assistance programs have the potential to add 235,000 more jobs without costing the taxpayers a penny.

Please express your support for H.R. 600 that reforms and restores DPA now by visiting http://capwiz.com/nehemia/issues/alert/?alertid=11709431 . It has a helpful area to compose a message, which will be sent directly to your Senators and House Representative.

Thank you for your time.

MaryB
10:56am • #8

This will help ALL first time homebuyers in the long run!   We need to get these buyers into our lower end price points, to get the "trickle up" buyers up into the next step!     Let's hope this measure is approved in the next few days.

Originally when this tax credit came out, it was not "advertised" as needing to pay it back.....

Joan Cox, GRI,CRS,ABR,-e-Pro

Metro Brokers - Turning Point RE

Centennial, CO    80111

720-231-6373

 

11:00am • #9

I think it's a great closing tool and benefit for first time buyers.  It would be great to see that they are not required to pay it back.

Cindy Dillon
11:03am • #10
150,299 Points 1 Featured Post

That would be the icing on the cake if it passes that way.

11:05am • #11

I think this is a complete waste of $819 billion at this point.  So let me make sure I understand this correctly.  The government plans on fixing our housing market by giving us a credit on the money that we owe them?  If I'm a first time home buyer this plan makes little or no difference in me buying.  However, like a few others said, down payment assistance would.  The problem is few people have enough MONEY. How is a credit going to give us the MONEY we need to buy?  If people have MONEY then usually the lack the credit.  Like someone else said earlier, I believe that the tax credit is just patch on the shredded tire at this point.

11:22am • #12
118,298 Points 1 Featured Post

Rick - I liked your post.  Although I do agree with some of the commenters that this is only one step and we definately do need more to get the housing market back up and moving.  However, it all starts with one step and this could just be the beginning (can we all just be a little more positive?).

Just last night, I was meeting with some clients and we talked about this tax credit and how it could help them save a little more in the next two to three months towards their down payment by allowing them to tweak their withholding a little and take home more money.

I feel confident that they will be in their first home by July 1 and hopefully they will thank me for helping them to get there.  That's good enough for me.  On that note, can I re-blog you for a post that I'm working on right now for my blog?

11:34am • #13

I sure hope this goes through.  My office will be having a Buyers Seminar on March 11, 2009 at Bluewater Waterfront Grill of Wrightsville Beach, NC.  The $7500 tax credit seemed a little strange to me being a loan that you have to pay back.  It would be much more attractive as a true tax credit.

Paul, 100 Days to Change

www.myNCbroker.com

 

11:37am • #14

Boy if this goes through it would be nice! I agree with the others that bringing back the Down Payment Assistance program would be a great kick start as well. We all have to be responsible enough to do our part by letting our representatives know how we feel!

12:00pm • #15

I am so glad I read this post today. I didnt realize that the buyers that buy in 2009 will have to wait until 2010 to recieve their credit!  That is interesting.  I have not read that on the IRS site either.

12:20pm • #16

If I'm not mistaken buyers could recieve the credit this year but only if they: close before April 15th (tax deadline day) or if they close later they could file an amended tax return.  Please correct me if I'm wrong on that.

Brian.

12:35pm • #17
417,103 Points 47 Featured Posts Outside Blog

This one would be a real winner. It is about time congress passed something meaningful.

1:15pm • #18

While I think that changing it from a loan to a credit would be a good thing, I am still a little ambivelant on what the actual effect will be.  Most likely it will just sweeten the deal for people that were already heading down the road to buying a home.

Now if it was $7,500 towards paying for a home, maybe....  Wonder how long it will be before someone comes up with a way to give you $6,000 towards buying your home so they can claim your $7,500 tax credit at the end of the year.

As for interest rates, I like them in the low 5% range, but would be happier at 4.5%.  I have a lot of people sitting on the fence to do refinances, waiting to see if the rates are going to drop.  I don't think the actual rate is going to make as much of a difference though in actual home sales as would better access to loans.

Lenders right now have things clamped up so tight that only a small margin of people can get a loan, and that is really hurting the market.  It goes a little something like this

  • If people can't get loans they can't buy houses.  
  • If people aren't buying houses, the prices go down.  
  • The prices go down, people walk away from their home loans.  
  • People defaulting on home loans cripples the banks, so they panic more and do less loans. 
 And so the cycle goes...  Somewhere along the way we need to start making loans again.

1:42pm • #19

Great piece! The rates are inconsistant, they were down to 4.75% and are now hoovering around low 5's. I think the tax credit is great, but like you said, it should apply to all. That would at least provide some sort of purchase stimulation in this herendous tsunami.

Great piece!

JD

3:00pm • #21

Rick,

I really don't think it will make a noteable difference to allow buyers to claim the $7500 and not pay the money back.  I find one of the most frustrating things about the current tax credit is that there is very little information being given about it.  Very few buyers in my market are even aware of it until I tell them.  When they do find it out, they are thrilled, payback requirement and all.  I think the PMI companies tightening up to the extent they have is a big obstacle for people trying to buy a home.  I just recently had a buyer that had to change loan programs midstream because the PMI co wouldn't insure him due to a bankruptcy 4 1/2 years ago.  This buyer had almost 15% down, with solid income and a 740 credit score.  It's frustrating!

6:45pm • #23
268,923 Points 3 Featured Posts

....and the contraceptive part of the bill will stimulate.... can we figure out what a 10% increase of 0 is. Please don't keep encouraging these idiots to continue stealing. They do so well without it. I am probably one of very few people that went to their congressman's office and got a copy, although you can download it if you like.

But I wanted the liaison to tell me in human terms what it means. The simple fact is (her words not mine) is that there is about 90 billion that will actually go into effect this year and about 31 billion of that will help with housing, auto, banking and business that work on infrastructure projects.

The rest will not even go into effect until 2010 and some wll take up to 2014 to go into effect. (what good is that for stimulating NOW. 2012 is aother election year and about 50% will be handed out then. I started to ask why? But I'm smart enough to figure that out. There is one interesting part though, a provision for states to ask for monies that they may need to finish projects that are underfunded. So the plan already takes FAILURE being part of the plan and where do you think that money will come from, another stimulus package perhaps.

7:42pm • #24
223,981 Points 27 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Rick... agreed.  I think the credit should be $25,000 to ALL buyers.  That is the goal, to provide stimulus to help move the inventory !!!  It is a no brainer.

7:47pm • #25
237,008 Points 2 Featured Posts Hit Router

I sure hope this becomes a true credit and becomes law, the real estate market needs all the help it can get.

Excellent point about not getting the refund (if it becomes law) until 4/2010.

8:39pm • #26
177,177 Points 13 Featured Posts

I don't think making the home buyer tax credit available to all buyers is a good idea.

Why do we want to reward move up buyers for doing what they were already going to do, which is buy another home.

We need to stimulate new demand into the market place, first time home buyers and investors are the only solution to this, and as such they should be the only recipient of a tax credit.

For what it's worth, I don't think the tax credit will have much of an impact on demand.  A $7,500 credit is not much considering home values just plunged by 15% this past year. :)

9:30pm • #27
3 Featured Posts

Thanks to all for your compliments, excellent thoughts and posts...   It is nice to see your opinions....   Donne - yes - feel free to re-blog this.

I think we pretty much all agree.... something is better than nothing - but it is just a small patch.... They are missing the forest for the trees...  Rates have to be in the low 4's I think for things to really stablize.  Anything above that and we will still be in tanking mode -- because of all the new foreclosure inventory that will be coming on this year..... and something has to absorb it before we start moving up again.... If lower rates don't happen (and I have been waiting for them to do something about rates since early 2006 when I called Ben Bernake's office to let them know that they would be tanking the housing market if rates kept going up (which they were at the time)...)   They didn't agree with me... (which I had a recording of that phone call) - But agree with Jacquie - it's also about making loans....which boils down to standards that aren't too tight...  but don't go back to being too loose...

  • f people can't get loans they can't buy houses.  
  • If people aren't buying houses, the prices go down.  
  • The prices go down, people walk away from their home loans.  
  • People defaulting on home loans cripples the banks, so they panic more and do less loans
10:17pm • #28
330,170 Points 3 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Hopefully this part of the stimulus package will close.  It's confusing to buyers to have a tax credit that is really a loan that is paid back over 15 years.  I agree interest rates could make a difference, but you hit the nail on the head with the concern that prices could drop further.

11:34pm • #29
638,165 Points 108 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Rick - I agree with your suggestion at the end of this post - I had the exact same thought (i.e. allow it for ANYONE buying a home this year, for the WHOLE year!).  Additionally, rates need to drop and stay low in order to provide the necessary impetus to action.

11:50pm • #30
1 Featured Post

I am worried that giving away free money will only put our country in further debt. The real reason that buying is down is the incredibly strict lender requirements, money for improvements is not an incentive to buy as far as I've seen.

11:50pm • #31
JAN
30
1 Featured Post

Dear Rick,

 I would be delighted to see this go through. Thanks for sharing!

12:24am • #32

Hey Rick, nice post. I just wanted to comment and say that the gov't is so narrow in scope with their tax credit. By choosing to give the break to first time owners, they're limiting themselvs to a relatively small group of people plus, do first time homeowners really have the money to take advantage of the credit.  First timers are usually young professionals in their late 20's or early 30's that have been saving up for a  purchase but, because of the ecomonic meltdown have lost, like the rest of us, a considerable percentage of their savings. 

The gov't should expand the credit to any home buyer it's the baby boomers that have the cash even if they've lost some money they've been saving for 30 years and still have a nice nest egg. Many of these boomers are wanting to purchase a home in Fl but, have "cocooned" because of the meltdown. If they  were smart they would expand the relief to everyone.  This would at least benifit those that can actually take advantage of the tax break and low interest rates.

7:24am • #34
1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog
Rick,
Thanks for the great post.  I am sure wanting to keep a close eye on this topic and this thread...I always appreciate the comments of AR...they are always chocked full of information!

Lori Cofer Pullman WA

8:39am • #35

 MaryB: The 501c3 "Down Payment Assistance" programs, are a farce and can only be used in FHA loans which means that if the govt wants to allow zero down all they have to do is change the rules on DP in FHA loans and eliminate them. They didn't. They raised the DP to 3.5%.  These programs are set up to make money for the nonprofits. They don't give the money - the seller does.  The artifically raise the sales price of homes, create a zero down program for people most likely to get in trouble, and create a profit (by taking money from the transaction) for the people running the so called 'non profit' (Ameridream etc).   I am a VERY strong buyer advocate and I strongly oppose these programs.  

Note that the provisions of other grant programs are not affected, eliminated or reduced by eliminating the 501c3 farce.

 

9:16am • #36
Outside Blog

Thanks for the good information, I have some clients that this may work for.

12:15pm • #37
FEB
01

I am having a hard time getting clarification on the new provisions put into the new stimulus. I bought a house in September of 2008 so I know I am eligible for the $7500 credit, but on the new stimulus it says payback will be eliminated. What i can't figure out is if this is just for people who purchased there homes in 2009? I have heard many different interpretations. Would I still have to pay mine back? If so, I would not think this would be the way the governement should do it. The bill was passed for April 9, 2008-June 30,2009. If they eliminate 2009 payback, 2008 should be as well. Can someone please help me understand this more.

shawn
9:23am • #38

In response to Shawn, I completely agree that if they do change the credit to a basic rebate with no obligation to pay back, that it needs to encompass the entire timeframe the credit has been slated for.  I think there will be many changes before the powers that be get it all settled, so we will have to keep watching and waiting for a definitive explanation.

3:19pm • #39

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Rick Hauser, ABR, GRI, Excl. BUYER AGENT CERTIFIED NEGOTIATION EXPERT (CNE)

Hawthorn Woods, IL

More about me…

Relocation Advisors Group - CHICAGO IL AND SUBURBS

Office Phone: (847) 566-7558

Cell Phone: (847) 809-6867

Email Me

Chicago Exclusive Buyer Broker - Relocation Advisors Group Inc. We offer a better form of representation for buyers because we are always on the home buyer's side - never the seller's side. Home buying tips. Home buyer advocates. Chicago area market conditions.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find IL real estate agents and Hawthorn Woods real estate on ActiveRain.