Special offer

New Michigan Fair Housing Lawsuit Filed in Federal Court

By
Education & Training with 123 ConEd LLC -- Michigan real estate continuing education School Sponsor 373

I was in the process of updating the online fair housing continuing education courses offered by my school (www.123ConEd.com), when I came across this recent Michigan Fair Housing Act case.  Because Fair Housing is such an important topic I thought that I'd post a summary of this recent case, which was just filed in court four days ago.

On January 29, 2009, the United States Department of Justice filed a new fair housing lawsuit against two Ypsilanti, Michigan, landlords for sexual harassment.  The suit was filed against Ronald D. Peterson and Glen E. Johnson, the owner and rental manager, respectively, of 11 single family homes in Ypsilanti, alleging a pattern or practice of sexual harassment of female tenants.   The complaint is an allegation of unlawful conduct. The allegations must still be proven in federal court.

The complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, alleges that Mr. Johnson subjected female tenants to discrimination on the basis of sex, including severe, pervasive and unwelcome sexual harassment. The complaint alleges that Mr. Johnson made unwanted verbal sexual advances, entered the apartment of female tenants without permission or notice, granted and denied tangible housing benefits based on sex, and took adverse action against female tenants when they refused or objected to his sexual advances. The complaint also alleges that Mr. Peterson, the owner of the properties, is liable for Mr. Johnson's alleged misconduct, and that he knew or should have known of Mr. Johnson's alleged misconduct but failed to take reasonable preventive or corrective measures. This case is being handled jointly by the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Michigan in Detroit.

The suit seeks monetary damages for victims, civil penalties and a court order barring future discrimination.  This case is currently pending.

It is important for all real estate professionals to remember that the federal Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin and disability. The Act also prohibits sexual harassment, which is something that many real estate professionals do not realize.

******************************************

To learn more about Fair Housing issues in Michigan (and many other topics affecting Michigan real estate professionals), please visit us at www.123ConEd.com.  123 ConEd LLC (www.123ConEd.com) is a leading online provider of continuing education courses to real estate professionals in Michigan. Our courses are fully approved and properly certified by the Michigan Department of Labor & Economic Growth. All of our online Michigan con ed courses are designed to offer our students the most information, as quickly and economically as possible.

Copyright © 123 ConEd LLC 2009. All rights reserved.

Comments(2)

Barb & Sal Dragotta
Macomb, MI
Macomb County Michigan

Jason...the only words that come to mind are 'oh, good grief' what is in the minds of some people; however, I never would have thought of this as an unlawful Fair Housing complaint. 
       If this is NOT proven in the courts it should prompt all in the Profession of REALTOR(R) to again realign their practices when dealing with clients--what one would think of as normal practices may need to be changed. No male should be alone with a female client period; This world is nuts on some law cases. There are money grabs around & money grabbers abound. I have become sceptical of some claims made by some females after personally witnessing a lie of "watching us" placed against a male co-worker
      Should this be proven as true, then it is one more sleaze who will be spending some of his time with others who may not ask for favors.  It will be a point well made to him.
      Just how do they connect the owner is culpable, unless he received the complaints from the clients, how would he know; how will it be proven that he should have known this side of his employee. If what is claimed did happen, then the guilty should be made to pay--the owner, if not involved should not be made to pay anything, but I suspect our Courts will not see it that way.Based on some of the monitory amounts awarded by some juries, it makes working with clients in any form a tad scary.

Thanks for the information, it is true that 'forewarned is indeed forearmed' We will be very careful in the future to never leave the other one alone with a client or potential client.  

Feb 02, 2009 06:42 AM
Jason Rose
123 ConEd LLC -- Michigan real estate continuing education - Farmington Hills, MI
www.123ConEd.com

Thanks for the comment.  I must profess that I was amazed at some of the conduct going on by real estate professionals all over the country with respect to fair housing issues.  I am both an attorney and a real estate broker, so I have been exposed to a lot of things in my career.  When I decided to open up a school to teach online continuing education, I was forced to delve deeply into the details of many issues facing real estate professionals on a day-to-day basis.  I was shocked when I researched and wrote legal updates relating to fair housing laws and the laws affecting persons with disabilities.  You wouldn't believe the blatant disregard for the law (and for just plain old common sense) exhibited by many agents and brokers.  And I was equally amazed with many of the huge civil penalties assessed against those agents/brokers, many of which were in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I'm planning to follow the case mentioned in this blog, and I'll post an update when the case is eventually resolved. 

Feb 02, 2009 07:00 AM