Special offer

Reduced Mortgage Rates Shot Down in the Senate

By
Managing Real Estate Broker with The Lowes Group 200410321

Senator John Ensign's(R-Nev.) housing recovery plan was defeated Thursday in the Senate by a vote of 62-35, largely along party lines.  The proposal was designed to reduce mortgage interest rates to as low as 4% for home buyers and existing homeowners looking to refinance.   

The bill also included incentives to lenders to increase loan modifications for those facing foreclosure and various tax breaks for small businesses as well as low and middle-class families.  

The Democrats believed it would be a windfall for the lending institutions and included tax breaks they did not support.

I was personally hoping this would be passed and coupled with the recent $15,000 tax credit to all home buyers give the housing market a much needed boost.  I am still trying to wrap my mind around why the Democrats would not support this bill.

What are your thoughts?  Am I alone in this thinking or were you hoping this would be included in the "Spendulus Package"?

 

Troy Batson is a Licensed Broker in the State of Oregon ~ troybatson.com ~ Duke Warner Realty ~ Bend, Oregon Real Estate

 

 

 

Megan Brunn
California Capital & Investments Group - La Jolla, CA

I really didn't think it would go this way...

Feb 06, 2009 04:44 AM
Jay Williams
Greenville, NC - Greenville, NC
Mortgage Loan Officer - Getting You The Right Loan

Troy, I have a hard time imagining how a mandatory rate structure could have been managed. It sounds like government price control to me, which historically has been a bad idea.

Jay

Feb 06, 2009 07:14 AM
Nichole LaVigne
Prudential Americana Group Realtors - Henderson, NV

Troy:  Democrats are not support more bailout to banks period. They have done nothing with the funds received thus far - including helping homeowners.  I am in the thick of it here in Las Vegas.  Belive, me the banks are not doing anything to modify loans and  do not deserve any more tax breaks or bail out funds.

Feb 06, 2009 09:21 AM
Troy Batson
The Lowes Group - Bend, OR
Bend Oregon Real Estate

I believe the proposal was aimed at home buyers and homeowners wanting to refinance, not more for the banks.  Lending institutions would benefit in increased business and fees, not from more money from the government.  The proposal would have encouraged more buyers into the market and help you chip into your bloated inventory. 

Feb 06, 2009 10:18 AM
Terry Haugen STAGE it RIGHT! 321-956-2495
Stage it Right! - Melbourne, FL

Troy, giving money to the banks will only result in the same thing that happened last go round, they will not lend, they will reward those that brought their institutions to the brink, and they will definitely not negotiate with strapped homeowners.  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.  Anymore money going to the banks and financial sector vs. tax breaks and tax credits for the little people is insanity.

Feb 06, 2009 11:23 AM
Troy Batson
The Lowes Group - Bend, OR
Bend Oregon Real Estate

Terry,  The proposed bill did not give money to the banks.  It was intended to lower mortgage interest rates for the "little people" to go out and purchase homes or refinance their current mortgages.  The banks would make money and so would the Realtors who sold the homes.  What's wrong with that?

Feb 07, 2009 01:02 PM