Let me begin by saying that I'm relocated from Colorado to NY, so am (while not in a fetal position anymore) still perplexed with east end Long Island real estate sometimes- six and one half years later.
In my area of Long Island (the east end), it is often spoken that some sellers prefer to have an "exclusive" listing, as opposed to a listing placed in the area MLS. It is, according to the real estate people (I can't say "Realtor"- I pay for the moniker. They do too, but somehow, it isn't working for my dues), "what the sellers want."
As much thought as I've given this, my inherent dislike boils down to this: in addition to being a detriment to the best interest of the seller, it is an undermining of Realtors in way that is deeply offensive.
When a Realtor sells the benefits of the MLS, they are selling the benefit of the real estate community as a WHOLE. Frankly, in the current environment, this seems like a good objective.
My area is adjacent to one in which listings are not entered into the MLS- the majority are not there.
For the life of me, I can't figure out how the word, or concept, "exclusive" is in any way a connection to "sell my house." Do sellers really say, "Please, I don't want other real estate people with buyers in- but get me this price- but do it with just a few other agents, not too many, OK?" ??
In the absence of an MLS, we'd all manage, but in this market, is now the time for consumers?
Sellers...or buyers (no readily available comp info)???
"Selling" the MLS is encouraging the seller to engage with a real estate community anxious to sell their home- simple.
Laurie, You are certainly in a strange market. I can't see any advantage at all for the seller to not have their property listed in the MLS. Are they paying less commission? Is it a subagency thing?