My dad did a blog recently on the dangers of borrowing from future generations, using a very sad-looking photo of his grandson, aka, my baby, Shane.  The blog in question can be found here.  Dad thinks that this stimulus package is going to rob his grandson of his financial future, or at least, that's how I read it.

sad Shane

I tend to think there are more than one ways of looking at most things, and if we are going to use kids to make our arguments for government's non-involvement, we might as well learn something about these kids' perspective on things.

A few weeks ago Shane came home from school bordering on tears.  He is an overly dramatic child, but hardly ever cries, so the tears tend to be genuine.  It turns out a girl named Jade who sat next to him since the beginning of the school year is going to be homeless.  She told Shane, because she wanted to share with someone.  The teachers and the administration of the school have no idea...  She was told not to tell anyone. 

Every day, Jade gets on the bus and goes to school and reads about elephants trouncing through the African plains, and tries to remind herself that it is, indeed, imperative for her to remember what 7X8 is at all cost.  The FCAT that all kids have to start taking in 3rd grade is coming up, and if she fails any of the subjects on it, she'll be held back for a year.  She has always been a good student.  She is a smart kid.  She doesn't cry, but Shane knows that she is scared.  They lost their home to foreclosure, and now they are just waiting to be thrown out.  They have all their stuff in boxes, Jade's, her mom's and her little brother's.  Her mom works two jobs, both paying less combined than what they need to survive...

Yesterday, Shane and I were talking about school and stuff, and he told me he took some money to Jade.  See, Shane works, in a manner of speaking.  He does chores for an ailing older lady living across the street from us, and the lady pays him, at times, rather generously.  Shane uses the cash for gifts and trinkets, but doesn't really have a concept of saving it yet.   He didn't ask me for help for his friend.  He didn't need authorization of any kind to help someone he cares about.  What he did ask was why nobody seems to know or care that this family will be homeless....  He then told me that when he was sent to run an errand to the extended day program's room, there were cots on the floor with some kids sleeping on them....  He told me he was glad they had a safe place to sleep.

I don't live in the projects or some rundown dilapidated neighborhood.  I live in what most would deem to be quintessential middle class suburbia.  Up until a few years ago, it was one of the best places to move to.  It was also the fastest growing county in the country.  There were no homeless children in Palm Coast.  There was no need for my son to worry whether or not his friend is sleeping on the street. 

If Shane understood the intricacies of the economy; if he was able to analyze all the implications of the stimulus package, and even disagreed with some of the provisions, I think he would choose to pay it forward, so that some of the sadness and suffering he sees around him is alleviated.  Failure is indeed, both inevitable and necessary.  I'd rather my kids failed as economists than as people...  For allowing me to see my kids' reactions to injustice and indignity and their compassion for their fellow men - thank you Mr. Bush, cause god knows if it were not for the massive screw-ups on all levels, my kids may have been just normal kids, without a care in the world...

How much is a child's innocence worth?

innocence

 

Copyright (C) 2008, inna hardison. please, don't steal from the starving artists, it's illegal and well, just plain freakin' wrong!
:-)

 
Post is included in group: Silent Majority
Post is included in group: Family Ties
Post is included in group: Dissent
Post is included in group: Dead Rainers Society
Post is included in group: Blatant Politics

43 Comments on How do you explain homeless kids to a child?

FEB
12

What a heart wrenching story. You are raising one very special young man!!

Happy Thursday!!

Lori

1:04pm • #1
3 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router

Hi Inna,

Let me the first of many comments, I'm sure, this was truly a heart-breaking story.  You should be proud of your son...he seems to understand the bigger picture of God's plan.  Lost innocence? Priceless

Dick Beals

1:09pm • #2
581,268 Points 34 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

I understand your point, but let me ask you this in response...

Would you take from your child's college fund to buy a new car?

The Congressional Budget Office has stated that this plan will SLOW the economic recovery by saddling it with more debt.  It isn't just robbing from people 30 years from now, it is robbing from US in December.  There will be fewer jobs created... 

Where will the money the government needs come from?  They aren't adding money to the economy... they are taking money FROM the economy.  Some evil rich dude will pay more in taxes... not a problem, right?  Except, the money that the evil rich guy will no longer have might have hired a worker directly.  Or, he might have bought a Lincoln Towncar, helping keep Ford in business.  Or he might have just bought some stock, which might have gone to growing another successful business (yes, there are businesses growing even today).  Or he might have put it in the bank... shoring up their balance sheet AND making more money available to someone that wants to buy a house. 

The Administration is saying that this plan will create 3.5 million jobs.  With the cost at $790,000,000,000 that means that EACH job is costing US and our kids over $225,000. 

I hate it when kids have to suffer from the mistakes and miscalculations of their parents... I know I did as a kid, and my kids have to suffer through mine... but, the government isn't always the right place to turn for the solution. 

And you are obviously doing a great job of raising a compassionate and caring child.  But did you notice that he didn't expect everyone else to do something?  He saw a problem, and looked for a solution within himself.  He is serving as a great example.

1:09pm • #3
2 Featured Posts

Lori - thank you for the kind words. Happy Thursday to you as well.

Back in a few to the rest of you...

1:19pm • #4
333,297 Points 4 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Inna - you are raising a wonderful young man. But let me ask you this, would you be so proud if he went across the street and took something from that lady, without her permission, to give to the young girl?

This plan is stealing from Shane, it is stealing from my grandson Daniel, from granchildren of mine and others that have not yet been born. It is making the children responsible for the sins of the fathers.

And, if you are going to blame Bush, there is enough blame to go around to Pelosi, Frank, Waters, Dodd, Reid, etc.  Almost everyone up there screwed up.

To paraphrase your copyright statement

Please don't steal from future generations, it is just plain freakin' wrong.

1:20pm • #5
2 Featured Posts

Dick - thank you!  Shane does see the bigger picture. One thing I hope he never grows out of:-)

Lane - I agree, the government isn't always the place to turn to, however when the situation is as dire as this one has become, non-involvment will not help anyone, whether our generation or the ones to follow. No plan is perfect, ever. We all know that. No government is perfect either, but whatever compromises need to be made ought to be made yesterday, because the reality is that if something doesn't get done (and I fail to see the free market being able to single-handedly fix this one), we are all screwed, one way or the other.

Mike - The plan, the way I see it is a necessary evil which wouldn't have had to happen if we didn't screw up. The way I see it we have to now pay for all our mistakes, the biggest being at the voting booths.

1:28pm • #6
333,297 Points 4 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Inna - two problems with your comment. 1) this bill will not pay for any mistakes, even the CBO, as well as economists around the world, agree that it will cause more problems than it fixes. It will force the payment upon future generations, not you (well not much), and certainly not me or your dad. 2) we are in the predicament where we are paying for the screw ups. Compounding those screw ups is not a necessary evil, just and evil. We can not justify enslaving those that follow with debt just to appear to be doing something.

2:02pm • #7
182,339 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

One thing people seem eager and willing to overlook is that most of the poor in this country are WORKING poor.  This single mother is working 2 jobs and still doesn't make enough to support her family, however most likely makes too much money to qualify for assistance such as food stamps and Section 8 housing.  This is very, very sad.  I'm glad, and of course not surprised, that your son is a kind, compassionate person. 

2:03pm • #8
2 Featured Posts

Mike - what would you recommend we do?  Every time there is a screw up of major significance, someone pays for it.... one way or the other. I am curious to know how you would suggest we proceed.

Chris - you are right, it seems that a lot of people assume the poor or the homeless are unemployed; these days we are just as likely to be wrong with these assumptions.  Thx for the sweet words about Shane:-) Peace-

2:22pm • #9

I like the new photo Inna. The mystery lady:)

6:36pm • #10
286,117 Points Outside Blog

Inna, You know I agree a lot more often with your father than with you but I think something to learn from this is that we should all get our children, grandchildren etc familiar and possibly involved with homeless programs, let them see and let them learn as your son is what it means to help those in need.

6:53pm • #11
2 Featured Posts

Israel - long time no see...:-) thanks for the compliments on the pic - but it's really all hubby's fault.

Hugh - Of course you agree with him, Hugh. :-)  As for getting involved with homeless programs, part of the issue is precisely lack of funds of any kind, and those who were fairly wealthy just a few years ago and donated generously to causes of all kinds can no longer afford to do so.  We have food banks, and homeless assistance programs, but they are now just names signifying no real relief...

 

7:34pm • #12
FEB
13

Inna as usual this is one of your powerful posts. No one seemed to care when we were borrowing from our future to pay for the Iraq war, but when it comes to helping out people here at home or creating jobs- that's deemed socialist or (insert any phrase here).

I think its very important that we stop the slide of foreclosures as well as shoring up the economy. The plan has changed so much, but a buy down of mortages with cooperation of the government would probably stem the flow of foreclosures. That and getting people back to work.

Great post!!

 

 

10:36am • #13
2 Featured Posts

Nogui - thank you, my friend.  This does seem to be the trend with our coservative counterparts - spreading democracy to the unwilling world - worth every debt for our kids and grandkids to inherit... Taking care of these same kids and grandkids now - socialism:-)

ARGGG!!!

11:20am • #14
2 Featured Posts

Curious that I didn't get a response from Mike S - with actual recommendatins for handling this mess.  Now that that bill passed, I am still interested to know what those who opposed it would rather have done.

3:11pm • #15
279,831 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

Inna, your blog brought tears to my eyes.  I'm very closely connected to a family that will soon be homeless because of foreclosure in an upscale Orlando neighborhood, Avalon Park.  As you drive through, there are seemingly hundreds of vacant homes for sale.  I always wonder what happened to those people and their dreams.  Where did they go, where are they living.  How are their children? Your son is a very wise little boy, with a very big and generous heart.  I mourn the loss of innocence for the children.  They have way too much information to carry around and not have the skills to process the data.  BTW I'm meeting some stagers from CA next month.  We'd love to have you join us!

4:38pm • #16
2 Featured Posts

Terry - the streets of Palm Coast are lined with for sale signs, most of them shortsales of which a good portion will end up in foreclosures.  I, too, wonder what happens to these people. Everyone moves on, but I can't imagine what it must be like... What happens to those who have no place to go...  I wish with all my heart my kids were not privvy to these concerns - they are growing up too quickly, losing the magic to worry....

Would love to meet you and Chris, but can't make any promises yet.:-)  If I can squeeze out of here for a few hours though, I'll be there.

5:43pm • #17
279,831 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

Inna, Chris et al are planning, at the moment to arrive here around the 11th of March or so.  Mark your calendar and get a sitter.  We're doing the entire day together!  Hope you can make it!!!!!

I'm not sure how old you are, but I think you're old enough to remember the days when kids didn't know much about anything that was going on in the world, nor did they care.  They had totally carefree lives.  I hate the fact that my grandchildren know way more than they should.

8:25pm • #18
2 Featured Posts

Terry - consider my calendar marked:-)  Though I must warn you, I hate rollercoasters and I am no fun at parties of ANY kind:-)

As for the latter part of your comment, yep, same here... Mine was carefree in all the ways that mattered, non of it having anything to do with money. We were not rich by any means, but the kids were spared of knowing anything at all about money or lack thereof...

8:38pm • #19
105,310 Points 12 Featured Posts

"I'd rather my kids failed as economist than as people"

Hidden amongst so many vowels and consonants is the true essence of the epistle. I do not have a clue about stimulus packages. I do not trust any government institution. I do not believe. I have been in the 9th ward. I have been to Biloxi. I have been to Slidell. I have walked the gulf coast.

I do not expect the government to finance nor fund every program. I do not believe that pouring more money into the institutions that created the problem will solve the problem.

Just as viruses have mutated and become resistant to antibio-tics and new antibio-tics must be found, greed and back door deals and unmitigated splurging have mutated and become resistant to old ways of oversight. New methods and oversight must be part of plans.

He is a beautiful boy. I don't really care what the pragmatist have to offer. If I were thirst, I believe the cup of water to quench my thirst would be held by that boy's hand.

He is but millimeters from the tree......Inna and Jon..........and he is a fine apple.

11:25pm • #20
581,268 Points 34 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Inna... that might not be correct.  the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) has stated that only about 25% of this package COULD be stimulus... the rest definately isn't.  Further, the stimulus package will actually slow GDP growth as soon as the end of this year... and slow job growth in the same time frame.  Basically, if we do nothing, we will be stronger by the end of the year than if we spend a trillion dollars... and with interest, this will cost WAY more than a Trillion dollars. 

I have a four year old and a just under one year old.  I care deeply about the world I am leaving them... physical, financial and political.  I hate to see them saddled with an unbearable burden because WE can't control our politicians.

11:42pm • #21
FEB
14
105,310 Points 12 Featured Posts

Lane - Viva la revolucion

1:15am • #22
176,599 Points

Lane you nailed it. This thing is a joke. It will enslave our offspring. I think that is what the libs want. They derive power from people needing them and believing that government is the answer.

11:11am • #23
2 Featured Posts

John - as always, well said... I don't believe either, John. I haven't in a while. Don't see that changing any time soon.  The only point I was trying to make with this blog was that money isn't everything; pragmatism isn't everything either, and sometimes one gesture of kindness or dispare from a child brings it all back to basics...  :-)

Lane - for every plan or theory, there are those who will agree and those who will disagree.  Utilizing all the methods of statistical predictors and calculations, none of which are ever truly unbiased, anything can be proven to be true to those wha re open to that way of thinking... In the end, it's all a sham, and we know it, but there is a fundamental wrongness in "enslaving" our kids and grandkids (to quote Kevin) for the benefit of the very few hidden behind the cloak of fighting a war on terror, and screaming bloody murder over borrowing from those same generations to help alleviate some of the suffering in this country.

Kevin - please feel free to come back when you have developed one original thought to share with the readers.

John again - viva indeed...

1:29pm • #24
279,831 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

Inna, I dont do roller coasters either, but there will be other entertainment to keep us laughing!  I read a few of the comments above.  Its really really hard for me to believe that our fellow human beings, if thats what they can be called, would deny anyone the same benefits they have enjoyed.  They don't want their children burdened with the debt?  I think bush pretty much took care of that with his spending in Iraq.  I wonder what they think about their money going to old people who don't have the financial wherewithall to care for themselves?  Everyday I shake my head and can't believe what I hear?

4:24pm • #25
581,268 Points 34 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Inna, I think part of my point is zooming right past.  Your son is obviously a generous person.  That is a wonderful thing.  He is willing to give some of what is his to help others.  I am all for that.  What I am NOT for is giving some of that which belongs to others. 

The government is taking money away from people to be generous with.  That isn't really generousity...  And some of the people whose money they are taking haven't even been born yet...

And Terry... Clinton doubled the debt.  Bush doubled the debt.  And if Obama gets eight years, he will double it again.  He might even managed to outdo Bush in just the first four...

9:22pm • #26
FEB
15
2 Featured Posts

Lane - I do understand your point. I just think that the rather narrow definition of what is and isn't ours is not terribly accurate.  When a person who can't afford medical treatment ends up with 120K in bills via emergency room, effectively, they are taking from my child and grandchild, because we do have to pay for it, one way or another.  By the same rationale, building the gynormous embassy in Iraq, and the war itself are taking from my kids and grandkids - we are paying for those now, aren't we?  In my humble opinion, a person's medical bills or mortgage payment is not as akin to theft as our engagment in Iraq... To me, a civilized society does have an obligation to care for its children, its sick and its elderly.  You can call it socialism, or whatever you want.  I'd take that over "compassioante conservatism" that got us into this mess any day:-)  Philosophical differences aside, nothing is black and white, hence expecting the bail out to work a 100% is akin to expecting the free markets to be free of greed and corruption. For as lost as people are in charge, we are screwed one way or the other, and I am not so sure I trust a CEO of a major failing banck any more or less for that matter than some nerdy economist who theorizes on the subject of wealth and failure.  :-)

1:50pm • #27
581,268 Points 34 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Ok, Inna... Point well taken.  Providing for the common defense is a Constitutional requirement.  "Free medial care" isn't.  Further, name something that the government does efficiently... 

My point is that if you and I are good people, we will help others as we can.  You and I are much more efficient in how we do it.  As we band together in our church and civic groups, we retain most of that efficiency.  The government has lost that, and has roadblocks in place to refrain from being efficient. 

As the burden of government increases, it becomes harder for us to find that extra bit to help others with... 

And because you don't agree with the money spent in Iraq or Afgahnistan doesn't make spending more on a policy that isn't even designed to do what it advertises any better.  In effec that is saying...  We're broke, you spent all of your money on guns, so I am going to take the credit cards and blow double that on booze... 

The CBO says that 20-25% of the money in the bill could actually be considered stimulus.  That means that $600B isn't.  That is the money I don't approve of...

9:52pm • #28
2 Featured Posts

Lane - I must hand it to you for being persistent:-) 

Common defense would have been if we stuck to Afganistan. Everything else could have been handled by a quiet assasination of the dictator and his inner circle, and not a an eyebrow anywhere would have been raised. That would have taken a few special ops units, and not trillions of dollars and untold lives lost on both sides. 

That aside, i will have to stick to my guns on societal obligatins, if you will. I am not suggesting that everyone is entitled to free healthcare, but I am suggesting that those who can't afford it, will indeed always be getting their healthcare at the expense of every tax payer.  Whether you like it or not, there is no way around it.  But if the insurance companies and the pharmaceutical companies were not in charge of our treatment options, the bills wouldn't be nearly as unaffordable. So much for private enterprise.  Just take a look at the latest Eli Lilly settlement over Ziprexa... Drop in the bucket for them - billions of dollars (taxpayer dollars mostly) wasted on made up treatments forced down the throats of unwilling patients.  Eli got rich over it. Some people died.  Not too different from the financial firms' fiasco, or the automakers'... 

For as long as people are corruptible or simply capable of being very very stupid and making really lousy decisions, there will be consequences that will trickle down to the next generations. Just the way it is, Lane, no matter what side you are on.  Sometimes, the private enterprise and local groups and organizations will be tapped out of funds of any kind.  Where i am - this is one of those times.

Best,  :-)

10:14pm • #29
FEB
16
581,268 Points 34 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Inna, I am persistant.  And I'm friendly. 

They can't do the assisination thing...  Against the law.  Has been since the Carter Administration as I recall.  Honestly, it should be illegal. 

The highest estimate of the GWoT I could find was $1.9T.  Tim Geithner just unvieled a $2T plan to stabilize the financial markets... This is after the $2T that has been spent or voted on in the last year.  And just for the record, the entire US budget used to be around $4T/year.  And what has happened?  The markets have continued to tank. 

And don't give the the "it's Bush's spending" line.  We both know that EVERY spending plan was approved by a Democrat majority Congress, and except for the "stimulus that didn't work last spring, Obama has had input and supported each one. 

The point is that in order to be generous, first you have to have something to give. 

I dare you to read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand... 

I'll let you blog in peace now.

;^ )

11:05pm • #30
FEB
17
2 Featured Posts

Lane - a few things:

Yes they can, we've done it before.  Gitmo is agaist the law, yet we did it... Invading a country is not particularly legal, yet we did that. 

The Bush references, if any, have nothing to do with what you call spending bills being passed, but what trillions of dollars have been spent on during the last 8 years.  Last I checked, we didn't have the majority dems for the first 6 years of that administration.

Lastly, yes, one does have to have something in order to give.  We had that something in a way of a surplus when Clinton left the White House. 

As for Ayn Rand - read it.  Had to in college.  Didn't like it then, won't like it any more now.  I'd stick to my leftist Orwelian materials - at least he was intellectually honest.:-)

BTW: I don't mind you being on here at all, so need to feel the need to "let me blog in peace".  You are a civil debater - Lane, and that's the only pre-requisite for anyone visiting or commenting on here...:-)

7:55am • #31
581,268 Points 34 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Inna - Aside from organizations with agenda, who said gitmo was against the law...

No argument from me on the GOP spending spree from 2001-2006.  They went nuts...  Tax cuts increased revenues to the treasury, yet the squandered it all and more. 

We had a decreasing surplus as Clinton left the White House with us sliding into a recession.  And, he actually fought every spending cut from the GOP controlled Congress... even let the government be shut down when he wanted to spend more.  It wasn't a Clinton budget surplus as much as a GOP mandated surplus...  and even with that, the debt doubled during the Clinton years. 

This time there is no check on the Presidential power, nor on the Congressional power.  I'd rather have them fighting each other so that they can't do any damage... 

 

2:02pm • #32
2 Featured Posts

Lane - everything that happened in Gitmo was against the law and the Geneva Convention, unitl, that is, we changed the law retroactively to make it all legal and kosher and f-ck the Geneva Convention... We held people without trial, tortured, humiliated and otherwise abused a bunch of folks we 'collected' in an effort to fight this stupid war.... Not terribly American of us:-(

You might want to check your numbers on budget surpluses and deficits.  I will agree with you on one thing: it is always better to have some semblance of balance of power. Unfortunately, the cost of doing so by electing McCain and Palin would have been too high...

9:29pm • #33
FEB
18
152,742 Points 4 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Inna - Powerful post and once I again I find myself thinking that you and your husband are amazing parents.  If more people raised their children to be compassionate indivisuals, we wouldn't be in this mess.

I also appreciate the dialogue between yourself and Lane.  While you do not agree, each of you managed to present your points in a civil manner.  The fact that this didn't devolve after 5 days is impressive.  I have read a great deal of the stimulus package and have studied the numbers relating to where the money would be spent.  Some parts seem like they will be greatly beneficial, others marginally and many appear questionable.  I do believe that the government has the potential to pull us out of this faster than the private sector.  I do also believe that poor planning and implementation could be disastorous (think Iraq).  At this point, my opinion matters little, but here it is anyway... For the sake of this county, my children and theirs, I hope this works.   

11:48am • #34
581,268 Points 34 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Inna, here is a post that has all of the numbers, with links to the sources.  Also, here is a comment from another post...

GDP Growth

Here is the chart of GDP Growth at the endof the Clinton Administration and the beginning of Bush's.  As we can see from the chart, the economy started slowing before Bush was even the GOP nominee for Prez.  Simply put, Wdidn't do that one. 

The slowing in the GDP is directly related to the "dot-com bubble" which many think had its beginning in unsound monetary policy. 

Again, in looking at the NASDAQ charts from the time, we can see exactly when that shinola hit the oscillating roator.  And again, it was well before Bush.NASDAQ Chart 

Take a look at the last link in the post, and you can see that the "stimulus checks" that came from the Bush Administration in 2001 failed to spur the economy, but the tax cuts in 2003 DID halt the slide and reverse the trend. 

Now we are seeing the exact same situation (although MUCH worse) and the current administration wants to pursue the failed policy.  

Follow that link and take a look at the paper on rebates v cuts. 

The problem is that cuts only affect people that PAY TAXES.  Rebates are more politically popular on the left because they can send money to people that DON'T PAY TAXES. 

This is further tweaked by the Obama Administration redifing TAX CUTS to mean payments to people that don't actually pay taxes.

 

Here is that post, which is referenced. 

I would also recommend reading Matt Heaton's blog here on A|R.  He has been right every step of the way on this... and in the minority at the same time.

12:00pm • #35
137,609 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

Your post is very touching and speaks volumes of the positive manner in which you are raising your son. It saddens me to think of the homeless in general, let alone homeless children. It is a national shame and disgrace that housing is not available. Compassion for our fellow humans is a core belief of any fundamentally good person. While I can appreciate the discussion you and Lane are having, the fundamental issue of homelessness remains. I am sure there are those who view themselves as compassionate while others are literally cold and hungry. If this is some new definition of compassion then we should all be concerned as to how the meanings of other words have been altered to the point of unrecognizability in the common parlance. Maybe the statistics numb the general public while the graphs help to blind us. Bottom line is homeless kids are homeless kids and that can't really be acceptable to a compassionate person can it?

6:43pm • #36
2 Featured Posts

Erik - thank you! We are not as good at the whole parenting thing as all that, and this gesture as most other things he does was all his own; it always is...  I am with you on right or wrong, I too, hope it works. For the sake of everyone's kids:-) Thanks for being here!!!

9:29pm • #37
2 Featured Posts

Lane - so I read every post you referenced, and I read the long list of "spending" provisions in the bill as well.  I do think it's all a matter of interpretation in this case.  I didn't read CBO's letter in the same light as you did, but I guess people get out of policies what they want to hear, and there is pretty much no way to be truly objective in any of this.  I am not happy we have to bail anyone out, frankly, but the idea that economics nowadays are as simple as saving money, putting it in the bank and living happily ever after while graciously contributing to every good cause that appeals to us is asinnine.  Read the blog again, Lane: the woman works two jobs, she lost her house. She WAS middle class.  She is GOING to be homeless. 

There are way too many people who did the right things, saved, went to college, got good jobs.  They used the money they made wisely, per the American standards - they bought homes in easy commuting distance to work, generally a metropolis of some kind.  The homes are now worthless and the companies they worked for no longer exist.  Now where exactly do they fit in in your simplistic calculation of good home buyers and otherwise responsible people?

Lastly, whether this works long term or short term only, as you put it, if something doesn't resolve the VERY REAL crisis right now - there will, indeed, be civil unrest. There will be riots. There will also be homeless kids in every city and in every suburb. 

So let's take just one of the examples of where some of the money is going to go to that you call "pork" spending: Tell me why spending money on putting in broadband lines in rural areas is a bad idea now, Lane.  The way I see it, with the global market place, that in and of itself just might empower a whole lot of people who live in those areas to be able to actually make money online, go to college online, or for that matter, give their kids the ability to see the world they can't afford to really be a part of at the moment.  I think all men were, in fact, created equal.  That means no matter where they happen to live, so long as they are in this country, they should have the same opportunities.  You call it, disparagingly, a liberal spending bill. 

9:44pm • #38
2 Featured Posts

Rich - your comment is the whole point of this blog, in a nutshell.  Thank you!  I have nothing to add to this, other than I sincerely hope that we do find the better angels of our nature, for all our sakes.  No child should ever be hungry or homeless in a civilized society.  We are better than that. 

All arguments aside, I belive Lane would help the needy and the homeless any way he can.  Most people I know locally no longer can.  I guess it's pretty tough to swallow how quickly things can change like that.

9:50pm • #39
FEB
19
Outside Blog

I know one thing that continues to hurt this economy and it is the continual negatism and criticisms relative to the attempts to fix it.  Whose economists do we listen t?.  The national debt can only be viewed in relationship to the GNP.  If the economy can kick up, and the GNP strengthens because of it, the debt is in relationship to a stronger GNP.  I for one am so tired of politicians playing "politics" with this new plan and the media folks who look for things to fill too much air time.  Your story is wonderful, and you should be very proud of your point of view.

6:13am • #40
2 Featured Posts

Renee - hi and thank you for coming by and commenting on this.  I, too, am tired of the politics of this on all sides really.  We can all have philosophical differences on what, if anything, the government's role should be in fixing the issues.  Unfortunatly, those are all empty arguments in the eyes of someone who can't afford to feed their kids or put a roof over their head.  All I was trying to do is tell one story I barely know out of an untold number that I know are out there.  I don't believe this plan will fix all of it, no plan can.  But if Jade can stay in their home, and it ends up costing Shane money in the long run, i am ok with it. More importantly, he is ok with it.  I'd rather kids here got a meal and a bed out of our tax money than a bunch of banking CEO's and Halliburtons of the world...:-) Maybe I am naive...

 

10:32am • #41
FEB
22
127,198 Points 2 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Inna - This is a powerful post with a ton of information.  I don't agree weith everything but I do respect the views and opinions of the contributors!

Thanks!

6:18am • #42
2 Featured Posts

Lisa - Thank you for reading.  I don't expect people to agree with everything I say - only to facilitate a dialogue. :-)

12:09pm • #43

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Img_1022 Rainmaker_large

Inna Hardison-ha media group Design, Printing, Web

Orlando, FL

More about me…

ha media group

Office Phone: (386) 451-5541

Cell Phone: (386) 451-5541

Email Me

Inna Hardison's Facebook profile


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find FL real estate agents and Orlando real estate on ActiveRain.