Ar_home_b_search
 

The White House, this week, announced the Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan. An executive summary of the plan may be viewed on the White House web site.

 

President Obama’s plan for the housing market consists of three components:

  • Refinancing for up to 4 to 5 million responsible home owners to make mortgage payments more affordable
  • A $75 billion homeowner stability initiative to reach up to 3 to 4 million at-risk home owners
  • Supporting low mortgage rates by strengthening confidence in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

 

Today I want to address the first component of Obama’s plan. Understand that the final directives of this plan are to be announced on or around March 4th. Specifics and changes to the plan are to be addressed then.

 

This writing expresses my views, opinions, agreements and concerns. You should not take these as facts because at this point in time we don’t have all the facts. Further details, again, are to be announced on or around March 4th.

 

Part 1---Affordability: Provide low cost financing for responsible home owners to refinance.

 

This has been occurring prior to the announcement of this plan. Everyone in the mortgage lending industry is gleefully aware that we have been experiencing a refinance boom since mid December 2008. And the plan acknowledges this.

 

I wrote a post last month titled What The Fed Is The Treasury Department Doing discussing my opinion that the government wanted everyone that could possibly refinance to do so. So this component of the plan is not a surprise and has been in play for a few weeks.

 

What is interesting about the executive summary is that it specifically targets home owners that currently have conforming loans with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This begs the question what if your current loan is not with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac?

 

This part of the plan focuses on those home owners that current owe greater that 80% of the current value of the property up to as high as 105% of the current value. These are home owners that are not currently in default and they are paying their mortgage payments.

 

There are two premises stated for which I take issue:

  • That this group is having a difficult time securing refinancing
  • The program will provide the opportunity to refinance through the two institutions, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

 

 

This group is having a difficult time refinancing?

 

The White House executive summary is declaring that if your loan to value is greater than 80% you are having a difficult time refinancing. This is a faulty premise!

 

I and other lenders are assisting customers like this every day now. There are programs available at today’s low rates. One of the examples uses in the President’s material is a borrower that would have a 90% loan to value for a refinance. It states they would be ineligible for Fannie Mae refinancing. I’m sorry this is just not true! This person can refinance and if they are using a conforming loan product it will require mortgage insurance. But it can be done.

 

One of the primary loan programs today for those with loan to value greater than 80% and less than or equal to 97.75% for a refinance, has been in existence since the 1930’s. This program is FHA.

 

So to say that a home owner can not take advantage of today’s low rates because they owe more than 80% of the value of the property is, in my opinion, factually inaccurate!

 

What I do agree with within the language of component 1, in the executive summary, is providing assistance for home owners with current loan to value between 97.75% and 105%. Component 2 does address those homeowners that have seen declines in value that place their current loan to value greater than 105%. I will be discussing that component in a later post. So stay tuned.

 

The program will provide the opportunity to refinance through the two institutions, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

 

I really want to hear what this means. Does this mean that the borrower will go directly to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

 

Does this mean that those of us that are loan officers directly dealing with the public everyday are going to have that source of business taken away from us?

 

Again, my opinion, what I read into this causes me concern. I can see a delivery system developed that retail mortgage loan officers working for direct lenders will not be able to participate. I can see a delivery system developed that will prevent loan officers working for correspondent lenders from participating. I can see a delivery system devised that will block mortgage brokers from entering this playing field. I can see a complete government takeover of the mortgage industry.

 

I hope I am wrong!!!

 

I do intend to address the other two components of the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan is subsequent posts.

 

I will also come back to this component as further details are made available.

 

In the mean time I am interested in your thoughts, praise or concerns with this program, at this time. A dialogue is in order. Our goal is and always has been to assist home owners. Let me know what you think.

 

 

 

Jay Williams

 

http://www.myhomeloanwithjay.com

 
This post has been included in North Carolina Real Estate News Pitt County, NC Real Estate News Greenville, NC Real Estate News
Post is included in group: All About Mortgages/Mortgage Networking
Post is included in group: Blatant Politics
Post is included in group: North Carolina Real Estate
Post is included in group: Silent Majority
Post is included in group: Realtors Needing the services of the Lending Powers

11 Comments on The President’s Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan---Part 1

FEB
21
2009
622,286 Points 21 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Jay,

Sure they can refinance but the benefits to the homeowner are slim when they are paying PMI and going over 80% in most cases.  The only person it benefits many times it the mortgage lender or loan officer.  Sometimes it does not make financial sense to refi.

10:35am • #1
2 Featured Posts

Jay,

The problem is that there bills are be written by politicians who have little to no understanding of mortgages or the industry.  They come up with these laws and not even the lenders are sure what they are supposed to do.  You need only to look to last year's H4H program, which did not work.

You are right to be concerned that programs such as these seem to be squeezing out the loan officers.  If lenders are mandated to refi or modify everyone's loan that would probably not be done thru normal channels.

And there is still a large segment of the population that is so underwater that they won't or can't be helped.

Michelle

10:39am • #2
1 Featured Post

Russ, I would hope, and know it to be true for me, that if a refinance is not of benefit to the customer that one would tell them so and not proceed. I have done that many times.

Jay

12:09pm • #4
1 Featured Post

Michelle, you are so right. The politicians don't have a clue and the example you cite with the H4H is a good one. I do see a strong likelihood of us being squeezed out. Taking food off my table so to speak.

I guess we can only do the best we can.

Jay

12:45pm • #5
1 Featured Post

Karen, I'm afraid you may be correct. When the politicians get involved, well may God help us all.

Jay

1:28pm • #6
FEB
22
2009
563,639 Points 17 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Jay - another set of of regulations with good intentions (I hope) but too many unforeseen consequences. What will the cramdowns do to future mortgages? Does this go on forever, or only until them money runs out? Does it incent bad behaviour, as Rick Santelli states? Does it replace Hope for Homeowners, or is this new money on top of the $300 billion already committed?

7:01am • #7
1 Featured Post

Mike, I have a feeling there are going to be a number of unintended consequences. I will be posting a recap of Part 2 later today. Then I plan to beak that section out in different sections. The possibility if unintended consequences in Part 2 is enormous

I'm reading that this is on top of Home for homeowners.

Oh my!

Jay

8:50am • #8

Jay, from what I understand, borrowers have to currently have a Fannie/Freddie mortgage to qualify.  Given how the mortgages have been bundled and sold I'm not sure anyone knows who their mortgage holder is.  On the flip side, I would like to have seen this go a little farther to help those about to lose their homes if they were victims of the subprime sharks.  How many people were able to calculate their reset mortgage payments 5 years ago?  Not sure I could have.

2:00pm • #9
1 Featured Post

Terry, you can actually pretty easily tell if the mortgage is with Fannie or Freddie. It is coded as such. In an soon to be upcoming post I will recap the part of the program that will address reducing homeowners payments.

You are right in that it would be difficult to predict payment adjustments down the road when an adjustable was taken out. The sub-prime financing was ill conceived and the price is being paid by everyone.

Jay

9:40pm • #10
FEB
28
2009
MAY
14
2009
501,798 Points Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

the plan is flawed, there is no oversight..and the banks don't have to participate if they don't want to.

8:17pm • #12

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 

Jay Williams, Mortgage Loan Officer Getting You The Right Loan

Greenville, NC

More about me…

Greenville, NC

Address: 218 E. Arlington Blvd, Greenville, NC, 27858

Office Phone: (252) 493-4802

Cell Phone: (910) 527-1809

Email Me

<!--NetworkedBlogs Start--><!--.networkedblogs_widget a {text-decoration:none;color:#3B5998;font-weight:normal;}.networkedblogs_widget .networkedblogs_footer a {text-decoration:none;color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:normal;}--><!--NetworkedBlogs End-->


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog