I knew that my affair with print media was ending when PC magazine stopped printing their magazine in January of this year.
The reason? Nicholas Carlson at Business Insider.com (Silicon Ally Insider) reported in November of last year, “Gadget and PC shoppers stay on-line now, preferring sites such as AOL's Engadget, Gawker Media's Gizmodo or CNET to print.”
With the escalating costs, loss of ad revenue and the advent of twitter and live blogging, news hits the blog sphere before the AP can even report it. The newspapers and magazine publishers are dropping like flies.
Which brings me to the point of this blog, is on-line marketing really better?
I think so, and so do others who at some point in the not to distant past worked for print media. To illustrate my point…this weekend I was tuned into HubSpot TV on-line and they did an Interview with Paul Gillian, in his words, “long-time technology journalist who’s worked almost exclusively on-line since 1999”, and they talked about a blog he had posted “Why on-line matters more than print” .
Because I have an insatiable appetite for all things marketing, I had to surf over and read the article. Once I read the article, I felt compelled to comment (leaving a link to my site of course). I let everyone know in my comment what I do for a living and that I had followed a link from Hubspot TV to the article. Because I loved the post and the writing style drew me in, I subscribed to the blog and newsletter.
Bingo! My behavior perfectly illustrates why on-line marketing is more effective than print marketing.
Yet, I still run into the print vs. on-line scenario every day. Many of my clients still insist that spending on an expensive ad in the newspaper or magazine makes their clients “happy”. No matter how much I try to persuade them to rewrite their marketing plan and focus on-line and no matter how many papers go under.
Why do sellers and some agents refuse to face reality why?
What does a “happy” client really mean?
Will seeing their home all glossy and in print really make them happy? What will agents do when there are no home magazines or newspapers left in which to place ads?
Is print marketing an ego thing with sellers or are we just doing a crappy job of selling them on reality?
I am interested to know what you think and what you tell the client who thinks they can advertise their listing on line so (so in their mind, for your exorbitant commission) they expect print advertising.
I am a little sad that magazines and newspapers are going away because I will need to find something else to read at lunch. The affair is over, I just have to accept it. We all have to accept it.
Caryn, I quit doing print advertising several years ago. Last year I had someone who insisted that her house be advertised with print. I finally told her that she needed to find another agent if that is what she wanted to do. I'm not going to do something that I know doesn't work just to pacify someone. As far as the cost is involved I spend a lot of time and money on my on line advertising so that is what I would throw back if someone asked about that.