In other words, the paper says, if the government tries to save taxpayers money, many people will lose their jobs and the whole economy will suffer.
The research note offers a solution any banker would love: The government should "estimate the highest price it can pay for the various toxic assets on financial institution balance sheets," then pay that price to buy them.
We figured Simon Johnson, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, should argue it out by phone with Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist for Deutsche Bank and the man who wrote the paper.
*** *** ***
What you think about the above article releasing a honest Deutsche Bank economist Joseph LaVorgna's simple solution?
Well, to me, it is telling a truth; but it is a partial truth to a banker, not the whole truth to the people. Due to its confusion, I changed the title in my comment on other website into the topic as follows:
|
 |
A Partial Truth Told: Bank Bailout Will Hurt; But Taxpayer May Avoid Being hurt
|
| |
時事評論|財經 |
2009/03/03 09:00 |
|
| |
|
|
Whom are going to be hurt by the bailout as the report claimed? The greedy bankers at Wall Street or the prudent Joe on Main street?
Mr. LaVorgna may have his good underlying assumptions. However, he is too narrow himself in Finance Ivy Tower (I don't want to say he has an invested interest in it) and doesn't see the whole true picture in terms of political-ecnomic viewpoints. Most likely, his statement is too absurd to assume CATS and PEOPLE are the same and on the same boat with the same fate.
Not true, the big ship may sink; but the small live boats are floating to survive, right? To me, the victims shall be those big reckless fat cats. Unless we the people let Uncle Sam keep doing what those fat cats want as LaVorgna believes, both of us will sink. We the people shall overcome if we can cut the ties to those too big to fail, in time.
Is there only this solution to lead the American people holding the bag? I doubt it unless Obama is unknowingly "cooperating" with Wall Street to do those "stimulus" plans figured out by Tim Gaithner and Pelosi.
If Obama can do the right things, most of American people is not going to be hurt. How can Obama do the right things besides his "big" socialist mouth? Well, you tell me what you think first. Then, I will use CDS (credit default swap) and the event of a projected event of California Monster Earthquake (or Katrina Hurricane) as example of analogy to explain the situation we are facing now.
It is very simple for You to clearly see through the mess and understand what I mean. You won't believe Joseph's solution by pointing out his simple-minded way of thinking and laughing at him by confidently saying: "We people won't get hurt."
It is a choice of us, or maybe Obama's.
I think the bail out can help. It will help to settle the housing market and create new jobs in our states. We just could not do anything that has not been working for the past 8 years. Mike