Special offer

2 Buyers + 1 House = NIGHTMARES

By
Real Estate Agent with RE/MAX 1st Class 0542725

Buyer Representation Gone Awry

In this market, it is great to represent serious buyers, but I have recently been contemplating a lose-lose situation for a buyer’s agent. Though the market is good in the League City and Friendswood areas, buyers are waiting like vultures for foreclosures in some of the area’s nicer neighborhoods. When houses around here go into foreclosure there can be bidding wars by people trying to get a bargain. (I guess this is similar to the way it was a couple of years ago in areas that experienced the bulk of the housing “bubble.”)

I recently had a buyer interested in getting into one of these bidding wars, and was concerned that one of my other buyers might want it too. Ultimately, none of my buyers were interested in the property, but it raised an interesting dilemma:

What if an agent represents two buyers who want to bid on the same property? I have never had this happen, but it has to have come up before!

It seems to me that once an agent knows that he represents two (or more) buyers seriously interested in the same property, he cannot ethically represent either one. The confidentiality he owes one buyer will make him unable to effectively advocate for and represent the other buyer.

For example, he would know how much both parties are willing to pay, how good the credit of each buyer is, etc. Of course, he wouldn’t be able to share any of this with the other buyer. Even hypothetical speculation about the motivations and plans of other buyers would be tainted by the information he already knows. If the agent tried to refrain from speculation, he would become paralyzed to the point of ineffectiveness. In my opinion, the only ethical thing to do is to refer both buyers to other agents, and take a reduced referral commission—a tough pill to swallow for an agent who has worked hard on two buyers’ behalves. To only take referral fees is like making just about nothing.... and avoiding these referrals could lead to legal nightmares

If you've dealt with this before, please share your nightmares and happy endings!

© 2009 Brian Worrell, Realtor in League City, TX. All Rights Reserved.

Posted by

 

 

 

  
Brian Worrell - GRI, CNE
Bayou Properties Realty  |   The Worrell Team, Realtors
Cell  281-948-7042  |  Fax  832-514-7029  |  www.BrianWorrell.com

 

2015 Top 20 Rising Star of Real Estate Under 40 by HAR
    (Awarded for excellence in Sales, Leadership, and Community Service)
 
Consistent Multi-Million Dollar Top Producer
2011-2016 FIVE STAR Real Estate Professional as listed in Texas Monthly Magazine 
 

 


Do you know anyone who needs help buying or selling real estate?

 

 

© 2004 - 2016 Brian Worrell Team, Realtors in League City and Clear Lake, TX - 281-948-7042. All Rights Reserved. LeagueCityBlog.com.  Bayou Properties Realty.

Dinah Lee Griffey
Windermere Peninsula Properties - Allyn, WA
Managing Broker Windermere Peninsula Properties

I hope to not have this scenerio. But it can happen-Dinah Lee

Mar 03, 2009 01:25 PM
Wanda Thomas
Montana Homestead Brokers, Broker, CRS, GRI, SFR, RN - Billings, MT
Billings Montana Real Estate

Here's a link for you on some decisions in our state of Montana about the very thing you ask about. 

  Montana Supreme Court Decision  Our Relationship Disclosure now includes a box for the buyers to check if they understand and agree that you can show other buyers the same property.  I always inform my buyer clients if I am likely to show the same property to other buyers and get an understanding on how I would handle the situation if both would like to make offers. 

I think if you have the activity that you describe above, and you have 2 buyer broker agreements signed up front, then you should disclose you are going to show to other buyers and inform them of a plan if both decide to make an offer, usually a referral.

It's much harder to go backwards on disclosure than to gain understanding up front.

If you don't have a buyer broker, well then!

Mar 03, 2009 01:55 PM
League City, TX - Worrell Team, REALTORS, GRI, CNE
RE/MAX 1st Class - League City, TX

Dinah - I don't want that situation either!!

 

Wanda - Thanks for your info on Montana law!  Very cool.  Disclosure is key.  However, you'd still be in a situation where you can't possibly represent each client's best interests effectively.  You could still wind up with angry clients... unless they're willing to be roomies!

Mar 04, 2009 12:17 PM
Kevin Heinrich
Heinrich Group - Clear Lake City, TX

Montana law? You can still hang people in Texas!

Mar 07, 2009 06:13 AM
League City, TX - Worrell Team, REALTORS, GRI, CNE
RE/MAX 1st Class - League City, TX
We aren't all such bruttes here in Texas. And we don't all ride horses or cows to work either. Any other Texas sterotypes we need to address?
Mar 07, 2009 06:21 AM