Special offer

Three Things Wrong with Obama's Housing Recovery Plan

By
Real Estate Broker/Owner with Exit Strategy Realty

Obama Economy

1. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans: Homeowners who have loans with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac are allowed to modify their loans provided  the remaining balance on the mortgage does not exceed more than  5% of the current  “Market Value”. I think  many homeowners  will not be able to modify their loans under this program because home values are declining at a faster rate than the cap rate of 5%.

2. Voluntary Lender Program : The plan wants to give ” $1,000.00 cash”  incentives to lenders who modify loans. A lender must be willing to reduce the current mortgage to 31% of the homeowners gross income.  For example, a person who makes $50,000 per year  has a monthly gross income of $4,1,66.67 .  According to this plan, 31 % of the monthly gross should be a persons mortgage. In this example the mortgage payment should not exceed $1,291.67 per month. The maximum mortgage a person would qualify for based on this scenario is $241,616.31 (based on 5% Interest, 30 year Amortization) .It is unclear if this monthly amount includes Principal, Interest, Taxes, Insurance. If taxes and Insurance are not factored in then the maximum mortgage would be less. Now let’s assume this same person has an existing mortgage balance of $300,000 and has a subprime rate of 7% . The monthly payment on this loan is $1,984.33 . The difference in payment between $1,984.33-$1,291.67= $692.66 per month or $8, 311.92 loss in 1 year to the lender. The new plan will only reimburse the lender $1,000.00 so the net loss to the lender in 1 year is now $7,311.92 . Does this sound like a good plan for the lender? I do not think so, and therefore I do not see this volunteer program working very well.

3. Plan calls to change the Bankruptcy Code: The third part of the plan will allow a judge in bankruptcy court to help modify the loans with lenders. The bankrutcy judge would be allowed to force the lender to lower the principal balance owed on the debt in order to make the monthly mortgage payments more affordable for the homeowner. I think the courts will overburdened with people attempting to modify their loans and this plan will not be successful.

While Obama tries to help homeowners from loosing their homes to foreclosures he admits many will not be helped with his plan. Those not being helped are people who are unemployed, those who have second homes, or those people who took advantage of the system to begin with and according to Obama will not be bailed out.

Posted by

 

Jack Lewitz Broker Owner

http://www.ilrealestatespecialists.com

 Email Jack Today: jacklewitz@sbcglobal.net

 Call Jack Today ! Cell: 708-309-5334 Office: 847-674-6710

Comments (6)

Pamela STETSON
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Abbott Realtors - Mahwah, NJ
I would love to help you buy or sell your home!

Wow...did you take this photo of the President? If not, is it copyrighted?

And, although we can all be a quarterback with the woulda, coulda , shoulda's ...let's give some credit to all those  moving forward with plans --- in about 38 days in office --- to try to unwind many, many years of mounting problems ignored.

Mar 04, 2009 05:26 AM
Lenn Harley
Lenn Harley, Homefinders.com, MD & VA Homes and Real Estate - Leesburg, VA
Real Estate Broker - Virginia & Maryland

Well, Jack, tell me, just what did you expect.  A bunch of amatures who can't figure out how to pay their personal income taxes are supposed to figure out a formula to help folks in trouble with their mortgages?? 

Come on.

These folks are so detached from the real world in their own little Obama caccoon, they don't even know what PITI means.

Most banks can save a lot more under the tax code for a foreclosure than a ((&^%%**(  $1,000 bonus.  That's lunch money for a covey of bankers.

Mar 04, 2009 05:57 AM
Julie Ferenzi
john greene Realtor - Plainfield, IL
Julie Ferenzi

I agree with you Jack.  I think good intentions don't necessarily solve problems.  These banks are already hard enough to deal with, and ticking them off with government intervention isn't going to make anyone's job easier.  One thing everyone forgets to remember is that while the bank holds the note, they are backed by individual investors.  Banks will modify loans, and have been for as long as I've been in real estate.  I'm not sure why we need the government to step in now...  didn't they screw everything up enough the first time?!

Mar 04, 2009 05:59 AM
Kathie Burby
Coldwell Banker Mother Lode Real Estate - Sonora, CA
REALTOR, SFR, Tuolumne County Real Estate Guide

Jack I think you have made some very good points. I agree with all of them. I also agree with Pamela at least this administration is putting forth a plan instead of ignoring the problem. But asking the banks to volunteer to take a loss, I don't see that happening.

Mar 04, 2009 03:45 PM
Anonymous
Meryl Cheney

Jack - I came across your post.  Interesting comment by the first lady - you cannot copy and paste photos unless they are yours, or at least give credit where they came from.

Secondly, it is very easy to criticize and call yourself a Blogger but do you have any solutions or do you just complain about what other people are trying to do  -  even if you disagree????

Cheney / EvanstonPR

Mar 14, 2009 04:25 PM
#5
Jack Lewitz
Exit Strategy Realty - Evanston, IL

For those of you who ask me about my photos. I have an account with iphoto and I pay for them. I am told this is totally legal to use on my blog posts. As far as solutions to the problem, I have several posts where I offer my own solutions to the problem... And I find nothing wrong with critizing something if I think it is appropriate to start up a dialogue with others on the subject.

Mar 15, 2009 03:38 AM