RPAC Funding, Ethics, and the Violation of Article 10 - The video provides a critical examination of the REALTOR® Political Action Committee (RPAC) and its affiliated groups, arguing that their funding practices violate Article 10 of the REALTOR® Code of Ethics. The author contends that RPAC's adherence to the unwritten "Friendly Incumbent Rule" frequently results in the endorsement and financial support of candidates who hold discriminatory positions against marginalized communities. Furthermore, the text highlights a significant lack of transparency and consent regarding member contributions, noting that mandatory fees and pre-checked boxes on renewal forms obscure political subsidization. The source also raises … (2 comments)
DISTRACTION: “National doesn’t control endorsements, the local committee does.” FACT: While local committees initiate endorsements, National RPAC holds veto power. If National objects, the endorsement is canceled and the result is neutrality. By refusing to negate endorsements of anti-LGBTQ+ and anti-diversity candidates, NAR effectively approves them. One of the most common defenses REALTORS® hear is: “Don’t blame NAR — endorsements are made locally.” That’s only half the story. Yes, state and local RPAC committees screen and recommend candidates, but those endorsements don’t stand alone. For congressional and federal races, National RPAC must approve, and National has the ability to stop endorsements when candidates clearly violate our values and ethics. Here’s how it works: … (1 comments)
Related Links:
Bob McCranie
Your best advocate when buying or selling your hom
;)
;)
;)
