One of my “senior” clients lost her home to foreclosure on Monday – due to an unrealistic expectation of the second lender. At some point in the earlier short sale process, the first became aware of my cell phone number as her primary contact number. The hard-of-hearing seller wanted to insure that she understood everything that might be presented to her. The bank took back her property at noon on Monday. She is now and has been prepared for this event – and is looking forward to moving forward with her life …. To date, at this late afternoon (16 comments)
Cheating! Is it an absolute bad idea? Or does it depend on the situation, definition and circumstances? I often get caught up in “institutional mixed messages” – or as I define them … teaching one thing when the opposite better serves most situations. Please don’t misunderstand … this is not a position that condones “cheating” but it is a position that asks for rational reconsideration of the definition of “cheating.” As an example, the University of Virginia builds great credibility on its “honor system.” Most of the written work being done by students has a required or implied pledge: (10 comments)
Related Links:
Jack Mossman - The Nines Team at Keller Williams in Lodi