Barney Frank and the Feds are at it again - this time about Condos

By
Education & Training with Real Estate Expert Witness Support

If you have read my blog before,  you know that most of my posts are about the legal side of our business and my work as an expert witness in real estate litigation.  This one is not.

You would think that the music would be loud enough for congress to hear now that billions have been lost by hard working folks when the banks crashed and burned over the mortgage scandals.  You remember -  making loans to be people who couldn't qualify.  And,  accepting "no doc" loans with little or no downpayment.   And,  the banks flinched under congressional pressure and agreed to this madness. 

Now,  Barney Frank is at it again.  After the crash,  Fannie and Freddie made up stronger rules on lending to Homeowner Association property.  They are very logical and make good business sense.  Frank is arguing that they are restrictive and are slowing housing recovery. Also,  remember;  Fannie and Freddie don't make loans.  They guarantee them.  So,   if these are such good deals,  banks would make the loan right?  No!  You and I wound up guaranteeing the bailed out bank loans.

Here are the new rules.   Do you think they are too strong:

  1. Sold units:  No loan unless 70% of project sold.  The old rule was 50%.  This is a problem in that many developers who couldn't sell their units, let the property go into foreclosure.  Then the rest of the unsold units dumped on the maket by the bank at REO prices,  destroying any equity the current owners had.
  2. Unpaid dues:  New rule is that no more than 15% of owners have not paid their dues.  If there was ever a red flag about a potential foreclosure coming is when the owners aren't paying their dues.   The expenses keep going,  meaning that the remainder of the owners have to pick up the slack.  
  3. % of ownership:  New rule is that no more than 10% of units can be owned by one person.  You can see where this leads.  With 10% or more of the units owned by one guy,  the whole project can crash if that owner defaults or goes bankrupt.

Yes, if we want to be selfish,  these rules hurt real estate sales.  But,  it is time for our industry to stand up for what is right for our country,  not just right for the politico. If you agree,  email your congress persons and senators and tell them what you think (unfortunately,  we have no one represeting us in the Senate in California). 

Here is email for your congress representative: https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

Here is email for your Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Posted by

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Guy Berry

Email - guy@guyberry.com

Visit my Website  

Connect on Facebook

 

 

Comments (1)

Kathleen Daniels, Probate & Trust Specialist
KD Realty - 408.972.1822 - San Jose, CA
Probate Real Estate

Guy, clearly the people making these decisions don't understand the real issues. They are trying to fix things they know nothing or little about.  My big peeve with condo sales is that a seller should be required to bring their delinquent fees current. If they do not have the money to do it then the banks should be required to do it. I understand the delinquent HOA fees are sent back as a bad debt. With increased numbers of foreclosures and short sales, we are likely to see more associations going bankrupt. It is unfortunate the bail out funds were not allocated in a way that would benefit the greater good of all.

 Yes, I think the rules are too strong and they don't address the real issues!!!

Jun 28, 2009 01:21 PM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?