If you are asking the question - FHA vs Conventional Loans, which one is better? You are not alone. I was speaking at an FHA seminar for real estate agents in Fremont, CA recently. The topic was "How FHA loans are playing a big part in qualifying more First Time Home Buyers". At the end of the presentation, I was asked this question - "Are FHA loans really better than conventional". I had similar questions asked by Buyers and Real Estate agents in other forums too.
There is no black & white answer to it - because it all depends on your situation. Below, I have compiled a table to compare the loan features of both the programs. As you would see depending on your specific situation, either one could be better. ** Since I wrote this post FHA Up front Mortgage Insurance Premium (UFMIP) requirements have changed**
|
LOAN FEATURES |
CONVENTIONAL |
FHA |
|
Max Loan Amount |
$729,750 |
$729,750 |
|
Max LTV |
90% |
96.5% |
|
UFMIP |
0 |
1.75% |
|
PMI |
Up to .89% |
Up to .55% |
|
PMI |
Only for LTVs>80% |
At all LTVs |
|
Appraisal |
Via HVCC |
Not via HVCC |
|
Non occupant co-borrower |
Not Allowed |
Allowed |
|
Declining Market Policy |
Yes |
No |
|
Higher Rates for Condos |
Yes, >75% LTV |
Same as SFR |
|
Min credit score at max LTV |
680/700/720 (Based on the loan amount) |
620/640 (Based on the lender) |
|
Occupancy |
All Types |
Only Primary Residence |
|
All funds can be gifted |
No |
Yes |
|
Impounds |
Optional <90% LTV |
Always mandatory |
|
Manufactured Housing |
Limited Options |
Allowed |
|
Pre-Payment Penalty |
No |
No |
Comments(3)