Seems like just yesterday that the party of No was touting these folks as just what America needs.
I think if you get scrape the bottom of the barrel a little bit more you just might find someone worse but I admit it will be difficult. Maybe we could get Peter King 
I suppose that he would be a good choice for the party of No.
No wonder people are actually electing the Al Frankens of the world. Seems we need a little comedy if this is the best that the Republican party can tout.
John - I can't wait to see the comments from the self righteous do gooders defending these leeches that represent the republican party. Between the quitters, skirt chasers, adulterers, public rest room toe tappers and young boy propositioners its hard to keep track of all the current crop of repressed crusaders running for cover.
The party of no moniker only applies to their politics though, they seem to say yes to every personal hedonistic indulgence they publicly rail against.
John, good post. I'm with John above. If this is the best they can do, we're in trouble.
Sarah was the best candidate in the last election for either party and she isa still better than anything the dems have to offer.
Hugh - hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha and hahahhahhahhahhahhahhahhahahhahhahahha!!!!
OMG Scott! ROFLMAO
Hugh, come on now, I know you are way more intelligent that to make that kind of comment. I've counseled you before, you cannot let one issue cloud your overall judgement!
Comments(6)