Special offer

Phoenix Real Estate Blog: 26% of Mortgage Defaults Are “Strategic”

By
Real Estate Agent with Sterling Fine Properties AZDRE# BR553129000

 

It feels like I posted just yesterday on the topic of walking away from a mortgage, but I checked and it was in fact 2 weeks ago -- how time flies!  Nevertheless, I’m not a fan of belaboring points, but this one just keeps rearing its head -- in the blogosphere and in the mainstream news.  And since most Phoenicians are, in one way or another, affected by foreclosures, I thought it appropriate to address the issue again.

This time, I have a name for what I’ve been referring to as “walking away” -- it’s apparently called a “strategic default” -- at least according to the folks in the University of Chicago economics department.  Several professors there released a paper earlier this month revealing that a whopping 26% of all mortgage defaults are strategic -- meaning the homeowners are defaulting even though they can afford to pay their mortgage.

The professors make some interesting points.  Among them:

No household would default if the equity shortfall is less than 10% of the value of the house.  (Calculate the equity shortfall like this: house value - mortgage = equity shortfall.  So if a house is worth $165,000 and the mortgage is $181,500 then the equity is -$16,500, or 10% of the value of the house.)

17% of households would default, even if they can afford to pay their mortgage, when the equity shortfall reaches 50% of the value of their house.  (So if a house is worth $165,000 and the mortgage is $247,500 then the equity is -$82,500, or 50% of the value of the house.)

People who know someone who defaulted are 82% more likely to declare their intention to do the same.  In other words, in communities where foreclosure rates are very high, strategic defaults are more likely.

In contrast to defaults that occur because the homeowner’s mortgage rate adjusts to an unaffordable level or because of an unexpected event like illness or job loss, strategic defaults are almost entirely due to negative equity -- when a homeowner owes more on the mortgage than the home is worth.

Zillow.com estimates that 22% of all homeowners in the U.S. have negative equity.  In the Phoenix Metro area, 80% of homeowners with nonprime mortgages do. 

But, as the professors point out, it’s not so much the fact of being underwater as it is the magnitude of the negative equity.  According to a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, among nonprime borrowers (subprime and Alt-A) in Phoenix the average amount of negative equity is $73,314 (in other words, the average home is worth $73,314 less than the mortgage on that home). 

In many areas of the Valley the equity shortfall approaches 100%.  For example, a friend of mine in Queen Creek owes $290,000 on her house that is now worth $150,000 -- her equity shortfall as a % of her house value is 93%.

Okay, so those are the numbers.  What can you do about it?  Stay tuned for next week’s post The ABCs of “Strategic” Mortgage Defaults.

What do you think?  Do you know someone who has “strategically” defaulted? Click on the “Comments” link below and join the discussion!

 

 

Posted by

I specialize in selling Phoenix real estate -- Scottsdale homes and Phoenix homes, including Phoenix short sales and bank owned homes. To see my listings and learn more, visit www.MyPhoenixMLS.com.

MyPhoenixMLS Real Estate

 

Lenn Harley
Lenn Harley, Homefinders.com, MD & VA Homes and Real Estate - Leesburg, VA
Real Estate Broker - Virginia & Maryland

Faced with 25-50% negative equity, the home owner is faced with 5-10 years or more before they can sell. 

I don't see these as "stratigic defaults".

I see them as a home owner who knows that they are going to be a prisoner to that mortgage for years and years and has decided to just whipe the slate clean, take their credit lumps and start all over.  Beginning the day they walk away and not 3-5 years from now. 

 

Jul 27, 2009 09:07 AM
Chuck Carstensen
RE/MAX Results - Elk River, MN
Minnesota/Wisconsin Real Estate Expert

Good info and what Lenn says is true...if it takes 5-10 years to maybe get equity back...well in 3-5 years you can probably buy a home again anyway.

Jul 27, 2009 09:46 AM
Chris Olsen
Olsen Ziegler Realty - Cleveland, OH
Broker Owner Cleveland Ohio Real Estate

I have also been reading about lender walkaways as well.

Jul 27, 2009 10:06 AM
michelangelo vasco
mvp realty inc. - Manhattan, NY

How about not sell, stick it out living in the home, paying down the mortgage and over time reversing the negative equity and watch value go up till it makers sense to sell

Jul 27, 2009 10:12 AM
Christianne O'Malley
Dickson Realty - Reno, NV
Exceptional Service - Delivering Results in Reno!

I find it interesting but not surprising that in areas where values have dropped significantly, it is more socially acceptable to strategically default.

 

Jul 27, 2009 11:00 AM
Jimmy Mulhern
Capital Foundation Realty Group - Gainesville, VA
Expert Representation at a Reasonable Cost!

You know what the amazing thing is...that two years after this started people are starting to realize that this was going on all around us.  By people I mean those outside of Real Estate because we saw it going on all around us in D.C.  The dumb thing is that if individuals would have simply stayed in their home, after the 5-10 years they would be paying more principle and closing the interest rate gap.  Instead, they ruin their credit (which results in higher interest rates on everything...even when they go to purchase that next home), throw money away in rent to someone else, and then when they do purchase - even at a lower price - start back up with the upfront loaded interest...which means they would have spent more money than if they would have simply stuck it out.  It shows the lack of knowledge that most consumers have about financial principles - your homes value only matters when you are looking to sell, not while you are living in it.  For example - let's use the 50% of the value equation.  $165,000 is the current value...let's say that we normalize and start rising at a 3% increase in two years, and split the difference for the 5-10 years at 7, that would mean that the home would be worth about $192,000 when they are ready to buy again.  Now instead of a 6% rate that they most likely had they are now looking at a 9% interest rate.  If they buy a like property and hold onto it for 5 years, still assuming the 3% increase in value, they would walk away with more cash had they simply held onto the property.  Lost in the whole mindset of these individuals is the "Sunk Cost" theory of economics.  Simply put, if you put $80k in cash down on a home, it's gone in either scenario, so even if you walk away your costs are still similar because you still need a house.  With rents increasing, your mortgage payment and rent payment are probably going to be pretty close once you factor in the interest rate deduction and tax breaks for taxes.  Lot's of variables here, but they are pretty much in line with historical trends. 

Jimmy

Jul 27, 2009 11:36 AM
Russ Ravary ~ Metro Detroit Realtor call (248) 310-6239
Real Estate One - Commerce, MI
Michigan homes for sale ~ yesmyrealtor@gmail.com

I have to argue that point with Jimmy above.  I have a rental property that I will break even on in ten to 12 years.  So is it smart to stay in it no way.

Jul 27, 2009 12:27 PM
John Novak
Keller Williams Realty The Marketplace - Las Vegas, NV
Henderson, Las Vegas and Summerlin Real Estate

This is a concept that I really struggle with. I completely understand the financial benefits but am torn by the moral and ethical sides of the issue. I'm also concerned about the long-term effects this will have on prices in neighborhoods where there are an excessive number of defaults.

Jul 27, 2009 02:37 PM
Jerry Murphy, CRS, SRES
Long Realty West Valley - Anthem, AZ
Anthem, Phoenix, and Scottsdale AZ Real Estate

Financially it makes sense, however ethically, it does not. I don't know if the figures you mention above are really what's going on.  I have to believe the good majority of the people who have defaulted on their mortgages did so due to some financial hardship. That being said, I've heard of financial advisors telling their clients to walk away from their homes due to the significant negative equity gap.  It's just bad any way you cut.  Good post and best of luck.

Jul 27, 2009 02:55 PM
Anonymous
Anonymous

It is wrong!  The homeowner committed to paying the loan.  If the home was gaining in equity just as fast, would they walk away because they were gaining too much value?  I am upside down in my home right now, but I signed a contract to pay on my loan.  In real estate, you need to ride the goods times as well as the bad.  Think before walking away...think 'karma'.

Jul 27, 2009 03:56 PM
#10
Mike Jones
SUNSTREET MORTGAGE, LLC (BK-0907366, NMLS 145171) - Tucson, AZ
Mike Jones NMLS 223495

I wish the homeowner who left comment #10 would have left a name.  At least a first name.  It takes guts to say what he/she said, and character to live by it.

Mike in Tucson

Jul 27, 2009 04:49 PM
Jimmy Mulhern
Capital Foundation Realty Group - Gainesville, VA
Expert Representation at a Reasonable Cost!

Russ - Investment is different then a homeowner - my point is based on the fact that the homeowner still has to provide themselves with housing, so they are paying out monthly payments that are actually building equity - either for them or for someone else.  Lost in all the discussions, even on the news and political scenes, is the fact that you purchased a home to live in.  All of these people who are doing this are making it harder for the real people who are losing their jobs to short sell their home, and for the people who decided to tough it out and are watching their values fall because someone who made a bad investment decided that it was easier to walk away.  Besides, Real Estate Investment is a long term option so unless you are close to retirement, 10-12 years is not that long.  If you are close to retirement then a real estate investment is not a good option because it takes time.

Jimmy

Jul 28, 2009 01:04 AM
Joe Pryor
The Virtual Real Estate Team - Oklahoma City, OK
REALTOR® - Oklahoma Investment Properties

Let me speak from a personal experience. Oklahoma went down the tubes in 1982 becasue of the energy bust. I was in retail still and i kept me sotres going to 1989 even though it damn near killed me with the work to do it. I wish sometimes that i had done a strategic default, and I have no probelm seeing homeonenrs do it under current market conditions, and the fact that loan mods have a low success rate. I am not sorry that I tried to pay back everybody, but at a certain point admitting defeat can lead to future success.

Jul 28, 2009 01:19 AM
Sam DeBord
SeattleHome.com -Coldwell Banker Danforth - Seattle, WA
Seattle Real Estate Broker

They will NOT be able to buy another home in 3-5 years, this myth needs to stop being repeated by professionals.  Lenders are already back to the 7 year bankruptcy standard, and it could get even worse as they get burned over and over during the next few years.  Lending standards will get tougher, not easier.

Walk away from a home, and lose your credit.  This will affect ability to get credit cards, home loans, insurance, and even jobs (yes, employers pull credit and don't hire some applicants because of their credit).

It's not strategic.

Jul 28, 2009 02:49 AM
David Krushinsky
Reasy Financial LLC - Peoria, AZ
AZ MB-1044208 MLO NMLS #202115

Hindsight is 20/20 but it's really tough to know exactly what to do in this situation.  I live in Phoenix and own 4 homes myself that are all negative equity. In my opinion I tend to be of the same belief as Mike Jones and Sam DeBord.  Every situation is different though.  Only time will tell and I am sure there will be regrets for many, as to the decisions they made.  Looking back to all my prior financial decisions I would much rather have not bought stocks, real estate etc.... One of my friends recently said it best that so many people worry about the storm that they don't take the time to dance in the rain. Here's to dancing in the Rain!!Dancing in the Rain - Phoenix Real Estate David Krushinsky

Jul 28, 2009 06:10 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Bob,

This is a tough issue to deal with. Strategic mortgage defaults are likely to increase in the hard-hit areas like there in Phoenix, Las Vegas, Florida and California. Everyone has to decide for themselves what's best.

Jul 28, 2009 07:43 AM
Monica Bourgeau
Portland, OR
Business Coaching

I have heard of people defaulting on their mortgage as a strategy, unfortunately there is actually an incentive to do so in many instances.

Jul 28, 2009 08:26 AM