Million Dollar Homes should have Million Dollar Photos

By
Real Estate Broker/Owner with Kirby Fine Homes


Luxury real estate bad photographyOk, so I would hope people would know by now that one of my biggest pet peeves is real estate photographs. It really drives me crazy with all the terrible photos I see constantly in the MLS database. I can understand terrible photos for $100,000 homes (but even those tilted photos get under my skin), but when it comes to terrible photographed homes priced in the million dollar range...I just don't get it.

Homeowners - When you hire real estate agents to sell your home, do the agents even tell you about their marketing plan? Better yet, do you even ask? Do you ask them how they will be photographing the home? Do you ask to see the end result?

 

 

bad luxury real estate photographyWhy does this matter? Because photos sell a home. Let me tell you something...agents have NO excuse for not paying for a professionally photographer to come into your luxury home. If you are letting them get away with walking into your home with their point and shoot camera, then there is probably a really good reason your home is not selling. Your photographs stink!

Agents - Who do you think you are? Professional is NOT the word that comes to my mind. If you are listing a high-end home, then you better be shelling out the dollars for high-end photos. You are doing a huge disservice to your client and not giving them the proper exposure they need for an expensive home. Either spend the money for a professional, or leave the luxury home market.

In this post you will notice the photos I have used. All were taken from active homes in the MLS system, high end homes currently listed for more than $2.4 Million. See the problem?

  • the first photo is pretty dark and not too inviting. A professionally photographer would have lit up this room with his equipment, lit the fireplace, and created a photograph that presented a cozy living room space.
  • the second photo is always the main feature of the home which buyers want to see - the kitchen. This tilted photo makes the room look narrow and small, most likely scaring buyers away. If a wide angle lens was used and the room professionally lit, then the kitchen would look like a gourmet space, without having an ugly flash bouncing off the far cabinet.
  • the last photo, just makes you want to jump in that tub...I don't think so. The room is dark, and I just "love" the shadow of the agents head taking up a quarter of the photo.

bad mls luxury photosSo hopefully, you can now see my points. Professional photography MUST be used when listing an expensive home. I see well known agents in the Twin Cities shooting million dollar homes themselves, and I am amazed that they keep getting hired. Sellers really need to understand that to attract buyers who can afford luxury real estate, you need to present the home as a luxury property. If your home photos stink, then maybe you should think about hiring another agent, one that specializes in selling luxury homes.

Comments (13)

Donna Harris
Donna Homes, powered by JPAR - TexasRealEstateMediationServices.com - Austin, TX
Realtor,Mediator,Ombudsman,Property Tax Arbitrator

Yikes!  Those are HORRIBLE pictures, for even a $200k house!  Maybe the agent had a couple too many to drink and he thought the kitchen was straight.

Aug 12, 2009 11:09 AM
Kim Curran
RE/MAX Unlimited of Northern Virginia - Bristow, VA

LOL Donna.

Definately not photos worthy of a luxury home. Or any home for that matter. It drives me nuts when all you see are the stock photo from prior MLS listings and it is a traditional sale. I kinda understand a short sale or foreclosure but the phrase "a picture is worth a thousand words' is so true. Helps to narrow down the search too.

Aug 12, 2009 11:21 AM
Jennifer Zammit
Realty Executives Elite Ltd. - London, ON
A.C.C.I.

It drives me crazy when agents don't put any photos or remarks in the MLS. I honestly don't know how some extremely hard working agents don't get the listings the lazy ones do.

Aug 12, 2009 11:28 AM
Jennifer Kirby
Kirby Fine Homes - Minneapolis, MN
The Luxury Agent

Jennifer - I honestly don't know how some "highend" agents keep getting hired. Their photographs are horrible, and usually sit on the market for a while. But it seems their name is constantly passed around as being a professional one. Keeps me scratching me head!

Kim - It kinds makes me want to mail the sellers pictures of their homes, but of course, that wouldn't be ethical. :(

Donna - I could only hope, but then that would mean he never checks what he took after he has sobered up, and that he is indeed, a terrible agent.

Aug 12, 2009 11:33 AM
Cindy Jones
Integrity Real Estate Group - Woodbridge, VA
Pentagon, Fort Belvoir & Quantico Real Estate News

If I had a listing in the uppper upper brackets you can bet that the professional photographer would be in tow.  Wonder if the owners have a clue what a poor marketing job their agent is doing.

Aug 12, 2009 12:24 PM
Eric Lee
Realty Executives - Phoenix, AZ
e-PRO, SFR - Phoenix, AZ

Just a possible correction (just a guess) on that last photo - given the level of barrel distortion I would guess the agent is using some sort of wide-angle adapter lens. These are low-quality after-market add-on lenses that have huge amounts of barrel distortion (causing the curved lines at the edges of the photo) but they have another problem: they are often so large that they block the flash. So the shadow you see is not the realtor's head but the shadow of the adpater lens blocking the built-in flash on a P&S camera. I used a wide-angle adapter for a bit and this was one of the challenges with it. I've seen a number of these in my MLS

IN fact, it can be a challenge with wide-angle lenses on DSLRs even - my Sigma 10-20 blocks the built-in flash on my D40 (although it doesn't block my SB400 external flash).

 

Aug 12, 2009 02:30 PM
Jennifer Kirby
Kirby Fine Homes - Minneapolis, MN
The Luxury Agent

Hi Eric,

I might agree with you but I cropped the photo some...the original photo does not distort. And since they didn't take the time to turn on the bathroom lights, the only light coming in is from the light behind them. Also, the below part of the photo I cropped, has the shadow turning inward to a neck. I understand what you are saying, as using the built in flash with a wide angle lens is pointless, and the lens usually vignettes at the edges.

Aug 12, 2009 02:43 PM
Eric Lee
Realty Executives - Phoenix, AZ
e-PRO, SFR - Phoenix, AZ

Ahh, I see. Pretty bad.

I once saw a $14.5M listing in the Phx MLS that was filled with photos lije the top one in yours - P&S camera on full auto. They either caught windows with the meter and underexposed like your top photo or they took photos of these huge rooms ($14M houses tend to have big rooms) with the wholly inadequate flash on a P&S and also underexposed.

Depending on the negotiated commission, that's a $145,000 to $435,000 commission and you couldnt' spend $500 for a professional photographer?!?!?!?!

Aug 13, 2009 06:16 AM
Michael Cole
CPG Tours - Orange, CA

Hi Jennifer,

Great post! I couldn't agree with you more...other than one thing. I don't think the selling price should have anything to do with which homes get 'high-end' photography. To me, every homeowner who hires a Realtor deserves professional marketing, and decent photography is just part of that - whether shot by the agent or a professional photographer. Thanks for the post!

BTW - photography is NOT part of the services we offer, but we do feel strongly about it being done right. ; )

 

Aug 13, 2009 10:48 AM
Monica Bourgeau
Portland, OR
Business Coaching

Excellent point, we see this in our MLS also. Or, even worse, I've seen a million dollar property with only 1 photo. Not sure how that home is being marketed.

Aug 22, 2009 02:41 AM
Theresa Anderson
A New View Staging and Redesign, LLC - Brooklyn Park, MN

Hi Jennifer,

YES! YES! YES! Excellent post! I am feeling a huge sense of job security based on the photos I see posted of homes. I really am amazed at how many pictures there are of doorways leading down a hallway. What purpose does it serve? There are so many bad photos that we actually feel this is a huge gap in staging training. Even if home staging is not needed, GREAT photos are needed. Over 85% of buyers are buying online first! And I agree that it should not be reserved only for high end homes. Isn't the purpose of the photos to help potential buyers aspire to live in the home? Not based on these photos! Thanks for an inspiring post!

Sep 15, 2009 04:19 PM
Robin Rogers
Robin Rogers, Silverbridge Realty, San Antonio, Texas - San Antonio, TX
CRS, TRC, MRP - Real Estate Investment Adviser

I am with you, Jennifer! And it's not just the million-dollar listings that should have decent photos. Our clients deserve our best efforts to market their property in the most appealing way. That's what we get paid for.

Cheers,

Robin

Sep 24, 2009 06:46 AM
Marzena Melby
Coldwell Banker Burnet Realty - Richfield, MN
Realtor, Twin Cities Minnesota Real Estate

I'd like to know what the sellers think of these photos. Wait... I know!  They are NOT PROUD.

Nov 04, 2009 10:10 PM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?