Why Invest in Real Estate?

By
Real Estate Agent with Berkshire Hathaway Rocky Mountain Realtors

I was recently challenged by a client to tell him why Real Estate would be a better investment for him then other investments.  Here was my responce.

 I am grateful for the Challenge of why should someone be in Real Estate. I guess although I have been able to quantify that question and have looked at those issues I have been in Real Estate for so long and have realized it to be the best way to secure long term wealth that I have not needed to answer that in a long time. I am grateful for the chance to work with you. I wanted to let you know that much of my investing is in my clients. I find them great deals so they can make money and I get great friends, partners and I get to meet your friends through my client's referrals. My business is based on making clients happy. So why would investing in Real Estate be a good idea? I would love to use the numbers we talked about as an example.

Let's assume you invest $400,000.00 into a stock or bond. With this Bond we will assume you get a 10% return on your investment. This would mean that for every year your money is in this investment the value of your whoop out money is increasing by $40, 000.00. Over a 25 year period this would return $4,333,882.38. Depending on the investment tool this amount could be taxes.  This assumes the investment is compounding itself.

Now let's look at how the money performs invested in Real Estate. Let's assume you place $400,000.00 into a real estate investment. You leverage your money and use this $400,000.00 as a down payment on a property worth $2,000,000.00.

If we assume a small appreciation of 3.5% the property would go up in value $60,000.00 per year the money stayed in this investment. Assuming this investment compounds on itself that appreciation over the same period of time would make the building worth$ 2,726, 000.00 more dollars then you paid for it. Your total investment would be worth $4,726,489.97. Although this number is larger then the return you would receive from investing in stocks with real estate you would get so much more. I have not yet mentioned that on your taxes you can depreciated this asset over a 27.5 year period of time. This depreciation would be saving you money on your taxes each year. I also have not told you that every year this property is held you are collection rents in the amount of 13,683.33 per month. Your mortgage payment on this property would be 8785.59 per month so in this investment you also are collecting positive cash flow of $4,471.00 monthly this is an additional 40k a year assuming no rental rate increase.  (Of course rent will go up)   Real Estate also can allow you to defer your taxed amount with a tool called a 1031 exchange.  Come tax time with this investment you keep more of your profit.

 

In a few final comparisons I would point out the real estate does not need to have the high return rate of a stock investment to return a similar amount of money.  I believe this is evidence that Real Estate is less risky.  As we can see with the recent stock correction stocks can lose value just like Real Estate.  However Real Estate does not have a 4% correction in one day.   Real Estate is also insured if the place goes down in flames your investment still has a return.  I know stocks can be hedged but your typical stock investment can go down in flames (Enron, WorldCom, etc) and you will see no return on your investment.  These are the basic reasons I believe Real Estate to be the best wealth building tool around. 

Comments (4)

Marcus Valdez
Berkshire Hathaway Rocky Mountain Realtors - Fort Collins, CO

I also did a little math and included that.

The Power and Beauty of Leverage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Stock

 

One house

$2,000,000.00

 

 

  

 

Invest

$400,000.00

 

Invest

$400,000.00

 

 

 

 

@

10.00%

 

@

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PITI

$8,175.00

 

 

 

Year

  

  

  

  

Rent

Total Return

  

  

2001

 

$400,000.00

 

$2,000,000.00

$18,499.80

 

 

 

2002

 

$440,000.00

 

$2,060,000.00

$19,054.79

21.81%

 

 

2003

 

$484,000.00

 

$2,121,800.00

$20,198.08

37.54%

 

 

2004

 

$532,400.00

 

$2,185,454.00

$21,409.97

53.76%

 

 

2005

 

$585,640.00

 

$2,251,017.62

$22,694.56

70.47%

 

 

2006

 

$644,204.00

 

$2,318,548.15

$24,056.24

87.69%

 

 

2007

 

$708,624.40

 

$2,388,104.59

$25,499.61

105.44%

 

 

2008

 

$779,486.84

 

$2,459,747.73

$27,029.59

123.74%

 

 

2009

 

$857,435.52

 

$2,533,540.16

$28,651.36

142.59%

 

 

2010

 

$943,179.08

 

$2,609,546.37

$30,370.45

162.02%

 

 

2011

 

$1,037,496.98

 

$2,687,832.76

$32,192.67

182.05%

 

 

2012

 

$1,141,246.68

 

$2,768,467.74

$34,124.23

202.69%

 

 

2013

 

$1,255,371.35

 

$2,851,521.77

$36,171.69

223.97%

 

 

2014

 

$1,380,908.49

 

$2,937,067.43

$38,341.99

245.90%

 

 

2015

 

$1,518,999.33

 

$3,025,179.45

$40,642.51

268.50%

 

 

2016

 

$1,670,899.27

 

$3,115,934.83

$43,081.06

291.80%

 

 

2017

 

$1,837,989.19

 

$3,209,412.88

$45,665.92

315.81%

 

 

2018

 

$2,021,788.11

 

$3,305,695.26

$48,405.88

340.57%

 

 

2019

 

$2,223,966.93

 

$3,404,866.12

$51,310.23

366.09%

 

 

2020

 

$2,446,363.62

 

$3,507,012.11

$54,388.84

392.39%

 

 

2021

 

$2,690,999.98

 

$3,612,222.47

$57,652.18

419.51%

 

 

2022

 

$2,960,099.98

 

$3,720,589.14

$61,111.31

447.47%

 

 

2023

 

$3,256,109.98

 

$3,832,206.82

$64,777.98

476.29%

 

 

2024

 

$3,581,720.97

 

$3,947,173.02

$68,664.66

506.00%

 

 

2025

 

$3,939,893.07

 

$4,065,588.21

$72,784.54

536.64%

 

 

2026

 

$4,333,882.38

 

$4,187,555.86

$77,151.62

568.22%

 

 

2027

 

$4,767,270.62

 

$4,313,182.54

$81,780.71

600.78%

 

 

2028

 

$5,243,997.68

 

$4,442,578.01

$86,687.56

634.36%

 

 

2029

 

$5,768,397.44

 

$4,575,855.35

$91,888.81

668.98%

 

 

2030

 

$6,345,237.19

 

$4,713,131.01

$97,402.14

704.68%

 

 

2031

 

$6,979,760.91

 

$4,854,524.94

$103,246.27

741.49%

 

 

2032

 

$7,677,737.00

 

$5,000,160.69

$109,441.04

779.44%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Power of Appreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment

 

 

 

Investment

 

 

  

  

Property Price

$2,000,000.00

 

  

Property Price

$1,500,000.00

 

  

 

 

Appreciation

4%

 

 

Appreciation

5.00%

 

 

Year

  

  

  

  

Year

  

  

  

  

2005

 

 

$2,000,000.00

 

2005

 

$1,500,000.00

 

 

2006

 

 

$2,080,000.00

 

2006

 

$1,575,000.00

 

 

2007

 

 

$2,163,200.00

 

2007

 

$1,653,750.00

 

 

2008

 

 

$2,249,728.00

 

2008

 

$1,736,437.50

 

 

2009

 

 

$2,339,717.12

 

2009

 

$1,823,259.38

 

 

2010

 

 

$2,433,305.80

 

2010

 

$1,914,422.34

 

 

2011

 

 

$2,530,638.04

 

2011

 

$2,010,143.46

 

 

2012

 

 

$2,631,863.56

 

2012

 

$2,110,650.63

 

 

2013

 

 

$2,737,138.10

 

2013

 

$2,216,183.17

 

 

2014

 

 

$2,846,623.62

 

2014

 

$2,326,992.32

 

 

2015

 

 

$2,960,488.57

 

2015

 

$2,443,341.94

 

 

2016

 

 

$3,078,908.11

 

2016

 

$2,565,509.04

 

 

2017

 

 

$3,202,064.44

 

2017

 

$2,693,784.49

 

 

2018

 

 

$3,330,147.01

 

2018

 

$2,828,473.71

 

 

2019

 

 

$3,463,352.90

 

2019

 

$2,969,897.40

 

 

2020

 

 

$3,601,887.01

 

2020

 

$3,118,392.27

 

 

2021

 

 

$3,745,962.49

 

2021

 

$3,274,311.88

 

 

2022

 

 

$3,895,800.99

 

2022

 

$3,438,027.48

 

 

2023

 

 

$4,051,633.03

 

2023

 

$3,609,928.85

 

 

2024

 

 

$4,213,698.35

 

2024

 

$3,790,425.29

 

 

2025

 

 

$4,382,246.29

 

2025

 

$3,979,946.56

 

 

2026

 

 

$4,557,536.14

 

2026

 

$4,178,943.89

 

 

2027

 

 

$4,739,837.58

 

2027

 

$4,387,891.08

 

 

2028

 

 

$4,929,431.09

 

2028

 

$4,607,285.63

 

 

2029

 

 

$5,126,608.33

 

2029

 

$4,837,649.92

 

 

2030

 

 

$5,331,672.66

 

2030

 

$5,079,532.41

 

 

2031

 

 

$5,544,939.57

 

2031

 

$5,333,509.03

 

 

2032

 

 

$5,766,737.15

 

2032

 

$5,600,184.48

 

 

2033

 

 

$5,997,406.64

 

2033

 

$5,880,193.71

 

 

2034

 

 

$6,237,302.90

 

2034

 

$6,174,203.39

 

 

2035

 

 

$6,486,795.02

 

2035

 

$6,482,913.56

 

 

2036

 

 

$6,746,266.82

 

2036

 

$6,807,059.24

 

 

 

Jun 11, 2007 03:28 AM
Michael Lindekugel
RE/MAX Metro Realty, Inc - Seattle, WA

Real estate is not necessarily better than any other asset class. There is no credible long term research to suggest that hypothesis is true. Over the long term the after tax yield will be no better than any other asset class. In the short term one asset class my provide superior after tax yields over other asset classes. Investors clamor to an asset class they deem undervalued and providing superior returns. Demand creates price pressure. Once asset prices reach a point where asset yields are no longer acceptable investors will divest of this asset class and move the proceeds into the next asset class viewed to be undervalued and providing superior yields. Economics 101.

Real estate is not necessarily less risky than investment in other asset classes for the same reasons I mentioned above. Risk is built into assets yield. If the asset is viewed as more risky, then investors will demand a higher yield to compensate for the higher risk. Economics 101.

You are missing a few items in your example. Yes, the investor receives a tax benefit from depreciation. The investor also pays a flat 25% depreciation recapture tax upon disposition of the real property. A 1031 like kind exchange only defers the inevitable.

I think 1031 like kind exchanges are over promoted by real estate agents and over used. First, the acquired property's depreciable basis is lower than the purchase price which may result in more cash flow taxed at the earned income tax rate. The earned income tax rate is likely higher than the capital gains tax rate. Second, upon disposition of the asset the investor must acquire a like kind asset. in highly appreciating markets, the investor may pay a premium on the acquisition because the seller is aware the investor must buy. At some point on the yield curve, the premium out weighs any tax benefit from a 1031 like kind exchange. Third, 15% capital gains tax is historically low anyway.

Jul 12, 2007 11:58 AM
Marcus Valdez
Berkshire Hathaway Rocky Mountain Realtors - Fort Collins, CO
I agree with you about 1031's.  i also agree with you about real estate being just as good as any investment.  Investments to me are not rated by anything other then return.  real estate, business's, stock,  i am looking for the best ROI.  I have just consistently done better with real estate then with other investments.  i have never purchased stock at 50 cents on the dollar.  yet...
Jul 13, 2007 02:36 AM
Bill Exeter
Exeter 1031 Exchange Services, LLC - San Diego, CA
1031 Tax-Deferred Exchange Expert
Actually, the 1031 exchange defers the payment of the tax and if used with the swap until you drop approach can actually be used to eliminate the payment of any capital gain and depreciation recapture taxes.  The investor will still need to worry about estate taxes, but the capital gain and depreciation recapture issues will go away as long as you keep 1031 exchanging.
Dec 22, 2007 10:47 AM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?