I was just watching a youtube instructional video about the housing crisis. According to this guys math, housing prices artificially rose up to 60% between 2000 and 2006, while incomes per capita actually went down.
I'm in southwestern Pennsylvania and we, as investors, can still find homes, livable homes in half decent neighborhoods, in the 20 to 30k range. My husband's parents bought their home for less than 10K in 1970 and had it paid off in less than 10 years. My parents in the 80s bough their home for 70K at a horrible interest rate, and just made their last payment last month. Was this a housing bubble too that never burst?
My question is how far can these prices rise over time? Do we really need to spend over 100K for a starter type home? Should home prices be out of reach for those people with an hourly paying job?
As nice as it may seem to have your home's value skyrocket, normal everyday people, with normal every day jobs simply cannot, and should not have to, shell out a grand for a house payment every month. I also think everyone deserves to own where they live. It makes for a better community, and therefore better neighborhoods and less crime, mostly because people care about what is theirs. I've seen first hand what renters can do to properties they don't own. It is not pretty.
House prices must come down if this is going to happen. People making minimum wage should be able to buy a home of their own and not spend an eternity paying it off. I'm not talking newly built homes in chopped up farms, I'm talking about renewed old neighborhoods, infused with the extra cash these workers will have to fix up these unpolished gems by having a $300 house payment, instead of a $1300 house payment.
Then, maybe the housing market will look more like it did in the 1950s, no 30 year mortgages, no artificially inflated house prices, and modest bank profit.
Comments(2)