Admin

Federal Lawsuit Blames Builders for Inland Empire Collapse

By
Education & Training with Chuck Miller Education Services LLC

This article appeared in today's edition of Big Builder Online. Who's next, the Realtors who represented the buyers? The lenders who gave them mortgages? What about the local governments who approved the neigborhoods and issued the building permits for those homes?

Gee, maybe I can file a federal lawsuit against Ford Motor Company for building and selling too many F-150 pickups that get less than 20 mpg causing their values to plummet. Or maybe I can file a federal lawsuit against all of the major oil companies for raising the price of gasoline causing the demand for any low mpg vehicles to plummet.

Source: BIG BUILDER News
Publication date: September 10, 2009


By Teresa Burney

Federal lawsuits filed recently against eight large production builders in California blame them for creating neighborhoods where high foreclosure rates have caused home values to plummet, wiping out the investments of many home buyers.

"I think [builders] had a lot of help from the financial institutions," said attorney Richard D. McCune of the McCuneWright law firm in Redlands, Calif. "But I absolutely believe that they were at the center and the beginning of this."

McCune filed the federal lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on Sept. 3 on behalf of buyers who purchased homes from Beazer Homes USA, Centex Homes, D.R. Horton, Lennar, Richmond American Homes, Ryland Homes, Shea Homes, and Standard Pacific Homes at the peak of the building boom.

All eight lawsuits are seeking to become national class action cases, representing buyers who put 20% or more down on homes in the builders' neighborhoods across the country.

"This particular group of buyers, anyone would be hard-pressed to say they did anything wrong," said McCune. "For the vast majority of these people there is no ability to go out and get the money back." For instance, one plaintiff spent $560,000 on a home in 2005. Now the local tax assessor says the house is worth $235,000. "He put 60% down on the house thinking that was the conservative move."

The cases ask for compensatory and punitive damages as well as restitution and/or disgorgement of profits.

While the plaintiffs' names vary, the eight lawsuits' allegations are essentially the same. Specifically, they accuse the eight builders and their mortgage companies of violating two portions of California's Unfair Business Practices Act, as well as fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

The general accusation is that the builders knew or should have known that by selling homes to investors who would not live in them and buyers who had credit issues and put little money down, they would create communities that could lose their value if home prices failed to climb and buyers with little investment walked from their purchases.

The lawsuits claim that the builders had the responsibility to disclose to buyers that they were selling to investors and buyers with poor credit and/or were investing little in their homes.

"What we believe is that, for the people who were qualified to buy these homes and were financed by the builder themselves through their mortgage companies, there is an obligation from the builder to let them know the facts that could materially affect the value of their homes," McCune said.

The lawsuits allege that the builders' practices in recent years of controlling every step of the home buying process, through appraisals and issuing loans through their finance companies, created an environment where there was no "neutral party" who didn't have a stake in the deal. Plus, McCune said, the fact that the mortgage companies knew the details of buyers' finances bolsters the allegations that the builder companies had to know there could be problems with foreclosures and buyers walking in the future.

"They certainly had knowledge that the house of cards had to come down," McCune said.

Beazer and Standard Pacific, two builders who returned messages requesting comment on the lawsuits, said they haven't been served with the lawsuits yet and don't comment on pending litigation.

For now, all the lawsuits' plaintiffs come from California's Inland Empire area, which has been particularly hard hit by the housing downturn.

"Our local governments are in trouble because of the shrinking tax base," said McCune. "Life savings are gone, and these national builders came and built and then left us with this big mess. I know they feel like the market has affected them badly, but it's hard for me to feel sympathetic because they played such a big part in this."



Chuck Miller GMB CGB CGP MIRM CMP MCSP CSP
President / Builder - Chuck Miller Construction Inc.
(208) 229-2553
chuck@chuckmillerconstruction.com

Show All Comments Sort:
Lenn Harley
Lenn Harley, Homefinders.com, MD & VA Homes and Real Estate - Leesburg, VA
Real Estate Broker - Virginia & Maryland

This is a classic case example of attorneys who should, rather than win a lawsuit, should be sanctioned for filing frivolous suits. 

This is the problem with the plaintiff's bar.  These guys want a class action certification, then want the national builders to settle.  The lawfirm would keep about 87% of any proceeds and the plaintiffs would get a coupon towards their next new home purchase.

I have often believed that these lawsuits were no more than legal extortion.

 

Sep 10, 2009 10:25 AM
Karen Anne Stone
New Home Hunters of Fort Worth and Tarrant County - Fort Worth, TX
Fort Worth Real Estate

Chuck:  What a jerk this attorney McCune is.  He cannot possibly have any sort of working knowledge of real estate, builders, or any sense of the market.  I am guessing that pretty soon he will become the object of much scorn and derision.  How silly !

Sep 10, 2009 10:30 AM
Karen Anne Stone
New Home Hunters of Fort Worth and Tarrant County - Fort Worth, TX
Fort Worth Real Estate

After re-reading your post... the only thing I would fault the builders on... is knowingly selling to such a high percentage of investor buyers.  Many of the more "market aware" builders in the DFW market keep a percentage cap on the number of investor buyers the builders will sell to.  It is on this point... that I think this attorney has his best shot.

Sep 10, 2009 10:33 AM
Heather Adkinson
Windermere K-2 Realty LLC www.propertiesinmoseslake.com - Moses Lake, WA
Real Estate Agent - Moses Lake

10% of a neighborhood is the max that a builder should sell to investors but the builder is not to blame.  If I became aware that renters had moved in on either side of me I would have had the sign up in an instant.

Sep 10, 2009 06:17 PM