What is the logic behind listing a short sale so far below the market that the existing lender(s) will never agree to it? We've all seen and heard that lenders will agree to a sales price up to (maybe more) 20% less than market value.
But what is the point of listing a property at 40% less or even more? I'm confused.
Aren't we setting the buyers up for disappointment when the bank doesn't accept the offer? More importantly are we really doing our seller any favors by listing so low that there is no way the bank will accept the offer and their nightmare drags on another month?
I see it (offering the home at less than market value) as a tool to generate multiple offers and 'hopefully' drive the price higher than the list price. But, ultimately what happens is that you attract buyers that are looking for a deal and not necessarily looking for a home. The likelihood of that particular buyer waiting for approval of the short sale is slim to none.......because guess what....they are off making offers on similar homes and waiting for the approval on ONE.......ONLY one......will it be your listing?
If your listing is in a market saturated with short sales and foreclosures, pricing the property so far below market is definitely going to attract these deal hunters. If your short sale listing is in a market that has very few short sales and foreclosures, pricing so far below market is just a waste of time.
I have had short sale listings in hot (yeah, I said it) short sale and foreclosure markets that get closed if priced correctly. I have also had short sale listings in areas where there are very few short sales and foreclosures. The trick is to price the home to generate activity and ultimately a reasonable offer the bank will accept.....but isn't it the same in any market..... with or without so many short sales and foreclosures?
Comments(6)